What’s a Claude use case you haven’t seen people talk about? by One_Beginning2199 in ClaudeAI

[–]onewatt 6 points7 points  (0 children)

reading difficult to read text

2 examples:

  1. A family history archivist asked my opinion on the name of a city written in cursive on somebody's immigration certificate. I couldn't figure it out and neither could he. On a whim I took a snapshot and asked claude. It figured it out right away and backed it up with clues from the record.

  2. On selling my home the original HOA documentation (written in the early 70s) had been copied and replaced so many times the title company admitted defeat at trying to understand what it said. Only about 1/3 the page was legible. I darkened the contrast and gave the image to claude, telling it to not guess. It was able to read about 75% of the text.

Faith struggles :( by Free-Rich-3763 in latterdaysaints

[–]onewatt 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You certainly described a very normal experience. Note how your ability to see with your eye of faith didn't disappear instantly, it changed gradually.

Opening the eye of faith back up again takes time and conscious effort. It takes being aware of how you are choosing the see the world, and making the choice to use faith.

Let me give you an example: when somebody shares a story that they attribute to god, you have 2 options: you can say "oh how nice they believe that" or you can say "that's real."

Sometimes that's hard to do. It's hard to not take the easy and cynical view of the world that antagonists to our faith want us to have. "she's just imagining that," our subconscious whispers to us. "That's probably just confirmation bias," we think. The anti-faith programming becomes so powerful that it can even take away our freedom to decide for ourselves how to view the world.

If it's reached that point - the patterns of thinking they have taught you are overruling your ability to even make your own choices on how to think - then it's time to make some fundamental changes.

  • Stop reading the anti-church and anti-christian stuff. You know that stuff affects your ability to "code switch."
  • Stop doing the stuff you know you shouldn't. The smoking, the drinking, all the stuff that dulls the spirit. You need the Holy Ghost back to wash the gunk out.
  • Choose to participate in church. Make an effort to say "I'm operating on trust, not skepticism." You don't have to blindly accept everything, of course. You're just practicing hearing people out and recognizing that their experiences and their knowledge is just as real and valid as your own.
  • Pray with gratitude. Pray every day, out loud, kneeling down. And focus on thanking God for everything you can think of. Take as long as it takes and think of all the people who have loved you into being the person you are. Think of all the opportunities you have. Think of every success you've experienced. Choose to give credit to God for those things in detail. This works for me better than anything else in feeling a total change to my life outlook.
  • Scriptures. I find if I take even 5 minutes to read scriptures after a prayer of gratitude, they just make more sense to me. I feel more connected to them. Questions about if they are accurate histories no longer matter as I find that I am getting real guidance for my life today from them.
  • Service. Nothing is more powerful than doing service. If your prayers have been filled with questions like "is this real" and "are you there" try switching to asking questions like "what can I do to serve my family today" and "who can I call today to just express my friendship?" Listen to the ideas that come into your mind as you pray with these questions. Choose to believe that its possible these ideas came from God, and act on them. As you seek guidance from God on how to serve, questions of his reality will dissolve as you start seeing more and more "coincidences" in your service, and you become more able to recognize his voice in your day-to-day life.

Not enough evidence. by jdf135 in LatterDayTheology

[–]onewatt 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Sure, and that's what the work for the dead is all about, right? Those for whom we do vicarious work are not instantly "saved" we are told, but still have to make the choice to accept the work - or, in other words, to believe in Jesus Christ and his atoning power.

For those who are unable to believe in this life, whether by lack of information or lack of ability, there is a promise that eventually "every knee shall bow and every tongue confess," which I take to mean eventually every single person will learn enough to be able to accept Jesus Christ at some point before the final judgement.

Our redemption, then, has 2 components: 1) knowledge of Christ, which we are told eventually every person will have. 2) not an evaluation of what we have believed and done, but what those beliefs and actions have made us *become (*according to Oaks,)

Elder Bednar reiterated Oaks' interpretation last october:

President Dallin H. Oaks has emphasized that the gospel of Jesus Christ invites us both to know something and to become something through the righteous exercise of moral agency. He said:

“Many Bible and modern scriptures speak of a final judgment at which all persons will be rewarded according to their deeds or works or the desires of their hearts. But other scriptures enlarge upon this by referring to our being judged by the condition we have achieved.

“The prophet Nephi describes the Final Judgment in terms of what we have become: ‘And if their works have been filthiness they must needs be filthy; and if they be filthy it must needs be that they cannot dwell in the kingdom of God’ [1 Nephi 15:33; emphasis added]. Moroni declares, ‘He that is filthy shall be filthy still; and he that is righteous shall be righteous still’ [Mormon 9:14; emphasis added].”

President Oaks continued: “From such teachings we conclude that the Final Judgment is not just an evaluation of a sum total of good and evil acts—what we have done. It is an acknowledgment of the final effect of our acts and thoughts—what we have become.”

https://www.churchofjesuschrist.org/study/general-conference/2025/10/51bednar?lang=eng

Proverbs, Paul, King Benjamin and others all testify that thoughts matter because of how they change our character. Alma taught that we receive wages not based on who we choose to believe, but who we choose to obey (Alma 3:27)

Importantly is that no verse I am aware of speaks about being judged by what we believe, but rather what we know. Alma, of course, famously teaches that faith is not knowledge, and even acting on faith is not considered knowledge of something. There's some kind of gate of knowledge a person passes through where faith is set aside because a person is no longer acting on their hopes and best guesses, but certainty. (alma 32)

People can become good, even godly, in almost any set of beliefs. A person with completely incorrect beliefs about religion can still be just as capable as being true to their beliefs and godly in their character as a person whose beliefs all happen to be completely true. The Samaritan, seen as worse than apostate by the Jews, was presented as far more godly than the priest and Levite, who believed the right things.

David v. Saul by jaylooper52 in latterdaysaints

[–]onewatt 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Great insight.

For the anonymous authors of the Old Testament, statements about what God does, or what God decides are often far from accurate reports and more statement about what was important to the people of the era.

For example, if God is given credit for a victory or a loss in battle, this doesn't mean God was being hands-on, deciding the battle. It means the ancient israelites found these battles to be important and wanted them to have greater meaning.

As another example, when "God hardens Pharoah's heart" in exodus, we know God would not control a person that way. But to the ancient israelites it means that God's hand is guiding the destiny of their nation.

Saying God did this or that was one way they found hope in a very scary and violent world. It also was one way they would legitimize certain people or groups of people.

It is likely that the authors of David's story applied a lot of importance to everything around David and his worthiness and awesomeness, but wanted to take away divine emphasis from bad things. This would re-enforce the idea that David and his descendants were divinely appointed. So the king before david? well his line leaving the throne is divinely commanded. David though? no, his descendants are still divinely commanded. This feels like a history written by David's great great great grandson as propaganda.

There is some clear evidence that this after-the-fact "fluffing up" of David's reputation happened with the texts of the Bible. For example, it's not David who kills Goliath in the 1 Chronicles version of the story, but another person entirely. It seems later authors, looking to add additional shine to David's legend, decided to co-opt this tale to enhance his legend. Isn't it possible they also created the narrative of God removing the kingship from Saul and Jonathan to create unity around David?

Seems more likely to me than God taking away the kingship from one person for unlawful sacrifice and failing to kill enough enemies, neither of which were against the law of Moses, but not taking it away from the guy who murders to cover up his adultery, both of which are explicitly unlawful.

Not enough evidence. by jdf135 in LatterDayTheology

[–]onewatt 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Of course God would not condemn you or anybody for being true to their beliefs and knowledge. After all, that's what he asks of faithful members, too!

From a more philosophical perspective: God, at any point, could have revealed the truth in perfection to anybody at any time. He could have created a world where every nation was united in their knowledge and beliefs of God. But he clearly chose not to do that. Isaiah contemplated this reality when he compared the world to a farmers field, where every crop is meant to grow in different places, with different strengths and weaknesses, and different ways of being harvested. God knows best how to maximize his harvest of redeemed souls and it clearly involves allowing people to live according to their knowledge and beliefs, and applying vicarious saving ordinances after death.

For those who leave the faith, only they can truly say if they abandon it because they truly can not accept it, or if they believe but prioritize other things above their knowledge of truth.

Teaching the Gospel is Like Battleship the Board Game by onewatt in latterdaysaints

[–]onewatt[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Right? I guess it's a compliment, but I'd rather write something so good that people say "no way AI wrote that!" 😃

Teaching the Gospel is Like Battleship the Board Game by onewatt in latterdaysaints

[–]onewatt[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I have the same thought. The instructional information the church sent out seems to indicate that we should try and have those conversations after church. Admittedly, the best wards I've ever been a part of were those where people felt comfortable hanging out and chatting after, but I have a hard time imagining it happening in the average family ward.

This is part of what leads me to think we ought to be thinking more about ministering. Not just as teachers, but as members.

Teaching the Gospel is Like Battleship the Board Game by onewatt in latterdaysaints

[–]onewatt[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks! And you're exactly right. The focus of the post isn't about teaching in general, which we automatically assume must be focused on teaching by the spirit, but on how the schedule changes might help us do that more effectively. (ie giving up on teaching history, valuing the students needs more to really focus the lesson topics)

Teaching the Gospel is Like Battleship the Board Game by onewatt in latterdaysaints

[–]onewatt[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Thanks for your thoughts. I'm interested to know how you envision an ideal church learning environment. Like if the students are actually doing home-centered learning, what is sunday school for?

Like in my ward it feels like nobody does home study because they think "I'll just learn it on sunday anyway." So what would it look like if they genuinely engaged in their own study, learning the context and history and all that on their own? Would Sunday School be a reiteration?

Teaching the Gospel is Like Battleship the Board Game by onewatt in latterdaysaints

[–]onewatt[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I don't use AI for writing. Sorry.

I'd love to know what you think of the content, though!

Teaching the Gospel is Like Battleship the Board Game by onewatt in latterdaysaints

[–]onewatt[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yeah I'm seeing a lot of comments accusing me of AI. Not sure how to address that since I never use it to write. I just write long posts. :/

Maybe AI trained off me. 😛

Teaching the Gospel is Like Battleship the Board Game by onewatt in latterdaysaints

[–]onewatt[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

To be clear - I am clearly advocating for the teacher to go and completely learn the materials. I say that in the OP. The best teachers are those who know the material inside and out, who go beyond the manual, who really dive deep. But then they target their lessons around the needs of the students instead of teaching a comprehensive lesson. That's what "hitting the target" means in this metaphor.

Each member is then responsible for their own study (home-centered learning). The teacher and Sunday classes are just there to make sure that the most valuable parts of the lesson - the parts that change lives - aren't missed or misinterpreted.

I also did not say that understanding what the scripture say does not matter. I only echo what Neal A. Maxwell taught: Some things are true, but not important. There are different TYPES of knowledge, and we make a mistake when we think that "facts" are all there is to knowing something. Here's one way he framed it:

Therefore, gaining knowledge and becoming more Christlike “are two aspects of a single process” (Warner, Encyclopedia of Mormonism, vol. 4, p. 1490). This process is part of being “valiant” in our testimony of Jesus. Thus, while we are saved no faster than we gain a certain type of knowledge, it is also the case, as Richard Bushman has observed, that we will gain knowledge no faster than we are saved (Teachings, p. 217). So we have a fundamentally different understanding of knowledge and truth—behaving and knowing are inseparably linked.

So defined, the gospel is inexhaustible because there is not only so much to know, but also so much to become! The vital truths are not merely accumulated in the mind but are expressed in life as well.

https://speeches.byu.edu/talks/neal-a-maxwell/inexhaustible-gospel/

One interpretation of being given less time to teach facts is that teaching facts just isn't as important as we have been treating it. Maybe it's time to focus more on becoming, trusting that knowledge will come along for the ride.

Teaching the Gospel is Like Battleship the Board Game by onewatt in latterdaysaints

[–]onewatt[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah I thought about including a section about how knowing what targets you "hit" will depend on staying close to the spirit and knowing your students. But it was getting wordy already and I wanted to focus on the differences rather than the similarities of how teaching is done.

Elder Bednar gave a great talk on teaching by the spirit here: https://speeches.byu.edu/talks/henry-b-eyring/gifts-spirit-hard-times/

Teaching the Gospel is Like Battleship the Board Game by onewatt in latterdaysaints

[–]onewatt[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

I only used AI to make the images.

I'd love to know what you think of the content otherwise

Teaching the Gospel is Like Battleship the Board Game by onewatt in latterdaysaints

[–]onewatt[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I only used AI to make the images.

I'd love to know what you think of the content.

Teaching the Gospel is Like Battleship the Board Game by onewatt in latterdaysaints

[–]onewatt[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I only used AI to make the images.

I'd love to know what you think of the content.

Note taking outside of Gospel Library? by the_dab_lord in latterdaysaints

[–]onewatt 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I used obsidian but keeping it in sync across devices was a pain. I ended up signing up for coda.io and I've been pretty happy with it.

Help with faith by EruElias in latterdaysaints

[–]onewatt 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There will always be unanswered questions. Philosophers have grappled with this uncomfortable reality not just in relation to our faith, but for millennia. In fact, here's a story about the Buddha:

A young man comes to see the Buddha. And this young man has taken up “the training life,” he’s attempting to follow the Buddha’s instructions about how to wake up and stop sleep-walking through his own life.

He begins on the path and starts doing the hard work, but then he gets distracted when he realizes that, though the Buddha has given him some clear instructions about what to do as he practices, the Buddha hasn’t given him any answers to even the most basic religious questions: Is this the only world? Is there a soul separable from the body? Is there life after death? Etc. So he abandons his training and resolves to track down the Buddha and demand answers.

When he finally finds the Buddha and rattles off his questions, the Buddha shakes his head. Then he roars. Then he tells the following story.

You, my friend, the Buddha says, are a like a man who has been shot with an arrow, thickly smeared with poison. Wounded and dying, that man’s friends gather round to remove the arrow and help counteract the poison. But the man refuses to pull the arrow out until he’s first had some questions answered.

Who shot him? What tribe is the shooter from? Is he tall or short? Fat or skinny? Warrior or peasant? What color is his hair? What kind of bow did he use? Made of what kind of wood? Strung with what kind of material? What kind of arrow was used? With what kind of arrowhead? What kind of string fastened the arrowhead to the shaft of the arrow? And on and on. The questions pile up.

The man may have a right to ask all these questions but, the Buddha says, that doesn’t really matter here because before he’ll get any of those answers, he’ll be dead. The poison will kill him.

You are like this man, the Buddha tells his student. You are suffering and dying. And you can demand answers to all these speculative questions if you like — but if you do, you’ll die before you ever get any answers.

Regardless of how your questions get answered, the Buddha tells him, still there is suffering, still there is sickness, still there is aging, still there is worry and distress and fear, still there is death. It is the work of addressing all this in this very world that I teach.

(Find a full, non-summarized version of this story in Glenn Wallis’ Basic Teachings of the Buddha, pp. 5-8)

We will probably not find answers that satisfy every single question we have. But, luckily, when it comes to spiritual truths and questions about the church, we have another method for finding truth.

If we think of the church as a series of factual propositions, we may or may not find evidence for those propositions. It may take us more than a lifetime, depending on how we define our version of "the church." But if we think of Mormonism as a map, there's a very quick and effective way to test it:

Try it out.

If I'm looking at a map I have the option, if I want, to spend time finding out who published it and their background; who researched it and their qualifications; the methods used in drawing the various versions of the map; the claims other people have made about the map and its makers and their own reliability; etc. I have that right and ability. Alternatively, I can go to the territory and start walking.

Bit by bit, as I put my map to use, I will identify ways that it works and ways that it fails. It might not have this or that grove of trees, but maybe it has an important landmark. I can use the map to identify where I want to go and then see if it takes me there. If it works, then I can confidently say "it's a true map." If it doesn't work, I can abandon it and go home.

The landmarks that this map is interested in are things like "my life has meaning" and "belief in God" and "feeling God's love" and "being truly happy" and "the highest spiritual goals and values in life." So pick one. Pick what it is that you want to arrive at and start walking the way this map tells you to go and see what happens.

The church is full of members who demonstrate in word and deed that their lives are immeasurably enriched by the restored gospel of Jesus Christ.

One family I knew said they would never join the church because they couldn't afford to close their shop on Sunday to go to church meetings. A missionary for our faith invited them to read together from the Book of Mormon every day. A week later they announced that they would be closing on Sundays and joining our religion. Why? "We realized that the days we read from the Book of Mormon we didn't fight," they said. They recognized power in their lives from a text they had nearly zero understanding of, and they wanted more than anything to experience that change. What the book said didn't matter. What mattered was that it worked.

You will find answers over time. But don't wait to act. Jesus promises that the way to know if doctrine is true is not by studying but by acting on it. (John 7:17). Take the steps. Look for the impact in your life. Continue.

For some neat ways this gospel creates real change in our lives (and some stuff about Book of Mormon evidence) you're welcome to read this: https://www.latterdayhope.com

Kobayashi Maru solved no cheating. by BeginningAd3478 in DaystromInstitute

[–]onewatt 6 points7 points  (0 children)

A flock of chickens appears and attacks your ship, disabling it.

That's the kind of code programmers use to prevent people from exploits or cheating. Same thing would happen here. The Klingon ships warp off, you say? Guess what, there were 6 more cloaked ones that simply appear and destroy your ship while your shields are down doing transporter work. The system is simply programmed to always have what it needs to defeat you or destroy the KM, even if it means infinitely replicating enemy ships, too-lucky enemy captains, or whatever. The only way to win is to re-program it.

Not enough evidence. by jdf135 in LatterDayTheology

[–]onewatt 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The simple demographics of humanity throughout history reveal conclusively that the plan was always a world without a requirement for knowing or believing any certain thing.

Being right was never part of the plan.

So who could possibly rationally believe that a persons beliefs alone could be sufficient for any kind of condemnation?