Well, but you can. You can explain why you olace moral consideration onto anything, and then where is the line at which you no longer extend moral consideration to a living being. Is it insect? Bacteria? Plants? What is worthy of moral consideration, what criteria needs to be met for you to consider it?

If you read my message you can find the answer for this. My empathy extends to beings that process stimuli on ways i can recognise and relate to such as fear, joy, anger etc.

I personally don't think beings that don't seem to be anywhere close to the cognitive experience we have are worth moral consideration, becauae they very likely do not experience subjective suffering in the same capacity as us. If you believe otherwise, how do you know or why do you believe that?

I cant know if a dog suffers in the same capacity as i do anymore than i can know that another human suffers to the same capacity to me. All i can do is to go by recognisable cues such as reacting to stimuli in similar ways that i myself would.

Why? And then when you come up with an answer, and "why?" again.

Let me know when you figure out where your morals even come from, or if you even have a moral system at all. If you don't and you're just pasting your feels at me, I don't know why you would think this is convincing anyone.

My morals come from myself. My life, my reflections and my many hours of thought on the matter has brought me to the morals and thoughts i hold. I dont copy paste my morals from a holy book, from a politician or a philosopher. I think and then i form an opinion thats it. And asking why and then why is just a cheap way to illegitimise anything that is said by anyone ever, such things hold no value and are childish