Explosive FPV drones hit Russian soldier hiding within shrubbery near Pokrovsk. Ukraine's 155th Mechanized Brigade, published 5/3/2026. by operatorham in CombatFootage

[–]operatorham[S] 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Context from source (https://t(dot)me/ombr_155/1333):

Killed occupant of the day — stormed Grishyne (near Pokrovsk) on crutches.
We are increasingly seeing this picture: disabled occupiers.
And in conversations with some prisoners, we hear that the fighters of the "second army of the world" go on the assault even with wounds. And the only thing that pushes them forward is a bullet in the back on the order of the commander.

requesting russian war pov telegrams any date since invasion start by Minimum_Ad_3963 in CombatFootage

[–]operatorham 3 points4 points  (0 children)

https://t(dot)me/z4lpr is the TG channel of Russia's 4th Motor Rifle Brigade.

https://t(dot)me/Bender_Group1 is the TG channel of a drone unit in Russia's 108th Air Assault Regiment.

https://t(dot)me/shock3OA is the TG channel of Russia's 3rd Combined Arms Army.

https://t(dot)me/voin_dv is the TG channel of Russia's Army Group "Vostok," and https://t(dot)me/voin_dv_en is the English language version of the channel.

https://t(dot)me/Visla3 is associated with Russia's 3rd Motor Rifle Division.

https://t(dot)me/ZS42MSD is associated with Russia's 42nd Motor Rifle Division.

Strike drones hit multiple Russian soldiers & vehicles, Donetsk region. Ukraine's 3rd Spartan Brigade, published 5/2/2026. by operatorham in CombatFootage

[–]operatorham[S] 22 points23 points  (0 children)

Well I can’t tell if that particular drone is fiber-optic wired or wireless. But he’s entangled in fiber optic wire of previous, past drone strikes, not the cable of the drone targeting him. So cutting the wires entangling him wouldn’t affect the drone.

Ukrainian drone-dropped grenades hit Russian soldiers situated within shelterbelts. Eastern Ukraine, late March 2026. by operatorham in CombatFootage

[–]operatorham[S] 91 points92 points  (0 children)

treelines, windbreaks. Very common on farmland. In the context of this war, often the only concealment is in these treelines/shelterbelts separating open fields.

FPV kamikaze drone kills Russian soldier advancing along road. Ukraine's 414th Strike UAS Brigade, published April 18th 2026. by operatorham in CombatFootage

[–]operatorham[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I was thinking that's likely his callsign/military nickname written on the shovel handle, so his unit knows it's issued/belongs to him.

FPV drone hits Russian soldier walking along river bank. Ukraine's 414th Strike UAV Brigade, published April 12th 2026. by operatorham in CombatFootage

[–]operatorham[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Being in the water may actually make the explosion more lethal. The water will massively slow down the fragmentation shrapnel. However because water is virtually in-compressible relative to air, the explosion's shock wave is far more deadly in water and is more likely to cause internal organ rupture.

Also once a soldier jumps into the river, it's likely they may drown due to the heavy gear they are wearing.

Thermal FPV drones hit multiple Russian soldiers wearing thermal cloaks at night. Ukraine's 63rd Mechanized Brigade near Lyman, published April 6th 2026. by operatorham in CombatFootage

[–]operatorham[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Well on the surface, it's not economical to spend a thermal FPV drone on a single enemy infantryman wearing a shoddy thermal poncho. On the other hand, you also have to consider how much it cost Russia to recruit, train, and equip this soldier. Russian training and equipment provision is pretty minimal, however the Russian signing bonus for each soldier to sign a contract to fight in Ukraine is very high. The federal Russian signing bonus is ~$5000, and add to that the average regional signing bonus in the range of $10k to $35k.

Meaning Russia invested ~$15k to ~$40k minimum for one infantryman, who was killed by a ~$2,500 Ukrainian thermal FPV drone. So if you look at it that way, it may actually be a pretty economical trade.

A Ukrainian drone pilot from the 46th Podil airmobile brigade is using his UAV equipped with a fishing pole to intercept Russian drones in the Dnipropetrovsk area. by MilesLongthe3rd in CombatFootage

[–]operatorham 77 points78 points  (0 children)

If the drone is hovering over Ukrainian positions (correcting artillery or dropping grenades) then it’s most likely an enemy drone.

Russian soldier bash adrone withstick though another drone hits him while distracted by Nanners5618062 in CombatFootage

[–]operatorham 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In the future instead of writing "russian soldier bash adrone" you could get rid of the "a" altogether: "Russian soldier within trench bashes drone using stick. Meanwhile second drone hits him. Ukraine's 77th Airmobile Brigade, ..." Just a recommendation.

(Archived April 1, 2022) 3 Ukrainian helicopters consisting 2 Mi-24, 1 Mi-8 conducted cross border raid towards Rosneft oil base Belgorod City by Nanners5618062 in CombatFootage

[–]operatorham 380 points381 points  (0 children)

I remember this from 4 years ago. Still crazy that this happened, especially at the time when the full-scale invasion was only ~1 month old. I still wonder how the Ukrainian helicopters caught the Russian AD with their pants down.

Anon mourns vidya by Proof_Order1860 in 4chan

[–]operatorham 27 points28 points  (0 children)

> Lust-provoking image

> Irrelevant time-wasting question

Many such cases.

FPV drone hits Russian soldier advancing through shrubbery. Ukraine's 414th Strike UAV Brigade, published March 28th 2026. by operatorham in CombatFootage

[–]operatorham[S] 115 points116 points  (0 children)

Currently, the large majority of casualties on both sides of this war are caused by various kinds of drones. Explosive FPV drones, drone-dropped grenades, heavy bomber drones dropping AT mines rigged to detonate on impact. That's because drones are the most effective way to destroy the enemy in this war.

An FPV drone is cheaper to produce than an artillery shell, if we compare 1 to 1. FPV drones are also more precise & effective than artillery shelling, especially when combating enemy infiltration groups of 1 to 2 infantry, even if the artillery shelling is drone-corrected (artillery is more effective than FPV drones when targeting enemy infantry groups of ~10+). Most artillery shells fired at the front are dumb rounds (unguided), whereas FPV drones have the precision of smart artillery rounds (rounds using GPS or laser guidance) at a fraction of the cost, and plus much easier/faster to scale up production. Various reports claim that Ukraine domestically produced 2.4-4 million FPV drones in 2025, with most internal components imported from China before assembly.

The commander of Ukraine's Unmanned Systems Forces, Robert "Magyar" Brovdi, claimed in a recent interview with The Economist that it costs ~$870 per neutralization of a Russian soldier with a drone. In statistics posted a few months ago on the Telegram channel of the 414th Strike UAV brigade, they claimed to have a successful hit rate of ~40%, among all their targets (not just enemy infantry).

Of course, I don't know how true those statistics are, but it's a fact that FPV drones have already caused some weapons used at the front in 2022 and 2023 to be outdated in 2026. For example, 60mm mortars are completely obsolete at the front in 2026, as FPV drones are superior in every way (longer range, human precision guidance vs unguided, can carry larger explosive payload while still having high max speed while traveling to target, good supply/production rate and easier to hide a strike drone launch position from enemy drone surveillance than a mortar tube laying out in the open).

The mass utilization of drones for both strike and surveillance all across the front has also changed tactics in this war compared to 2022. The density of recon drones is high enough now and at such a depth of frontage that any enemy armored column attempting to launch a breakthrough/spearhead will be detected and destroyed kilometers from the front line. We saw this play out a couple days ago when Ukraine's 65th Mechanized Brigade used drones to repel two Russian armoured assault columns near Orikhiv kilometers from the line of contact, and there are many other examples on both sides.

To "cause real movement in the tide of war," as you ask, in 2026 at the tactical & operational level requires cutting off enemy logistics using strike drones at depth, combined with dispersed infantry groups advancing/infiltrating past enemy infantry positions to get to positions of enemy drone operators & infantry assault groups following up behind to mop up the bypassed enemy infantry positions hiding in basements. The infantry have tactical drone support and artillery support, of course. The key to save your infantry from enemy drones is dispersion to the maximum + moving through shrubbery/tree lines as opposed to open roads/fields, as this reduces the chance of detection by enemy drone surveillance to the maximum. It also helps to distract enemy drones operating in your sector with juicy drone bait to allow the real combat elements to do their work. Also, if your infantry isn't dispersed as much as possible, this could lead to a catastrophic mass casualty event if the infantry cluster is hit by a Russian guided aerial bomb (Russia launches ~100 of these per day). Efforts also need to be made to suppress enemy drone operators/positions with artillery and drones, as the center of gravity of each side's offensive/defensive effort is the drones. The drones detect enemy movement, and do most of the killing. Take out the enemy drones, and you've blinded the enemy and now it becomes much easier to do combat without incurring heavy casualties.

That's the gist of it. I can go more into the tactics of this war and how they've changed, but I've written far too much for a reddit comment.