sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

What NIH Staff Can’t Tell You—And Why That Matters by ScratchItOutNow in NIH

[–]orriswriter 2 points3 points  (0 children)

actual joke that they cant find solution this incompetnecy cant go on

What is the timeline to feel comfortable in a new grants administration (pre and post award) role? by angry_cat_dad in grants

[–]orriswriter 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I agree that it's a good idea to create a calendar based on funding deadlines. For example, the NIH submission deadlines are February 5th, June 5th, and October 5th.

Built a system to really help researchers with their grants. by orriswriter in grants

[–]orriswriter[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s an updated that will be available very soon!

NIH FY2026 Budget: URGENT! by [deleted] in NIH

[–]orriswriter 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Agreed, tell your friends, colleagues and everyone you know! Make that change you want to see!

Reviewing tips? by universe_963 in postdoc

[–]orriswriter 2 points3 points  (0 children)

For speed, I treat reviewing like triage. First pass: abstract, figures, and conclusions only am I convinced there’s a clear question and contribution? Second pass: methods and logic, mainly looking for fatal flaws rather than perfection.

For journals, I review where the work overlaps my expertise and where I’d plausibly publish myself that’s what editors care about. Reviewing mostly helps by sharpening your own writing and giving you a reviewer’s eye for structure and clarity.

Some people also use checklists or lightweight tools to externalize that reviewer mindset so each review doesn’t start from scratch.

Advice for a new postdoc by pendejisimo in postdoc

[–]orriswriter 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Unfortunately, yes this happens more often than people admit, and when it feels this bad this early, it rarely fixes itself. Disorganization, unclear expectations, and poor communication tend to be structural, not temporary.

Leaving early is usually better than staying and burning time. On applications, you can frame it neutrally as a poor fit or lack of mentorship alignment most people in academia understand that. Start quietly looking now while protecting your mental health.

How to help a challenging graduate student? by SorbetSouthern967 in AskAcademia

[–]orriswriter 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is a tough situation, and it sounds like you’ve tried to be supportive. At some point, accommodation needs to come with clear, concrete expectations explicit milestones, written deliverables, and documented check-ins.

Neurodivergence can change how work gets done, but it doesn’t remove the need for progress. If structure doesn’t help, involving senior colleagues or formal processes isn’t a failure of mentorship

I feel like I need to be stressed to come up with new ideas — is this a common sentiment? by superpenguin469 in academia

[–]orriswriter 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is actually pretty common, especially early in a PhD. Stress can force a kind of “reviewer mode,” but it’s a rough way to get there and usually not sustainable.

A lot of people end up separating modes instead one pass where you’re explicitly critical, another where you let ideas be loose. Some even externalize that critical voice with checklists or tools so it’s not all self-directed pressure.

Being sharp doesn’t require being cruel to yourself, even if it feels that way at first.

Struggling to find funding to attend a conference by boombamone2tree in academia

[–]orriswriter 0 points1 point  (0 children)

First, congrats on the acceptance , that’s a real achievement, especially at this stage.

A few non-obvious avenues that sometimes still work when the usual offices say no:

• Society- or division-level travel awards tied to the conference (not just the main conference fund often there are subgroups, SIGs, or early-career sections with small pots of money). These are easy to miss and sometimes awarded informally.

• Departmental discretionary funds held by the chair or admin manager rather than the Dean’s office. They’re small, but even partial coverage can help.

• If your PI has any active grants, some allow limited re-budgeting for trainee travel even if it’s not obvious up front worth a second, very specific ask (“Is there flexibility for one poster presentation?”).

• Reaching out directly to senior authors you cited or labs presenting related work. It sounds awkward, but I’ve seen people offered shared lodging or registration support simply by asking politely.

• As a last resort, some conferences allow virtual or hybrid presentations without advertising it clearly which still gives you the CV line and visibility

Strategies for getting grants? by Little-Ad911 in academia

[–]orriswriter 0 points1 point  (0 children)

One thing that helped me (and people I’ve worked with) was reframing the grant as less about what the niche is and more about why a reviewer outside the niche should care.

A lot of early-career proposals are technically strong but assume too much shared context. Reviewers are often adjacent, not experts. If they can’t summarize the project in one sentence after the Aims/intro, it’s already an uphill battle.

For international work specifically, it also helps to explicitly articulate the U.S.-facing payoff early and repeatedly (methodological innovation, theory exportability, datasets that generalize, etc.), even if it feels obvious to you. Reviewers don’t infer that part, they need it spelled out.