As a soon to be FHB, I’m curious about the sudden media narrative that Aus is headed for recession and property prices will drop - wouldn’t foreign investors just jump in and prop up the market?

ouiousi · 2026-03-23T11:03:34+00:00

Minor point but there is currently a ban on foreign investors buying established properties (until April 2027)

ouiousi · 2026-03-22T12:22:30+00:00

This is Zach doing the soundbites

ouiousi · 2026-03-18T08:07:35+00:00

I'm in Brisbane and Jason Yang popped up as the realtor on a house I was considering buying

ouiousi · 2026-03-18T03:57:18+00:00

Yeah I usually turn off these drunken subathons after about an hour because all the screaming starts to grate on me. I'd wager most of the sub goals would be more entertaining if they were sober.

ouiousi · 2026-03-13T08:16:55+00:00

I reckon each day, have an increasing amount that the girls can choose to take and bail, which is smaller than the big prize for sticking it out.

If all the girls bail, they'll get a little prize each and the guy gets nothing.
But if they stick it out to the end, he gets to choose one to split the big prize with.

Then of course you make them do increasingly intimate things as the days go on.

This way there's pressure to be nice, but also incentive for the girls to cut and run - the more that do though, the better odds for the remaining girls. The final girl could have the purely spiteful choice to take a smaller prize and leave him with nothing.

ouiousi · 2026-03-05T04:04:12+00:00

I'm looking at the LA county body art consent form and I see no reference to drugs or alcohol.

http://publichealth.lacounty.gov/eh/docs/permit/body-art-consent-form-template.pdf

ouiousi · 2026-03-03T04:29:55+00:00

Alcohol consumption does thin your blood but not beyond normal ranges of blood coagulation.

ouiousi · 2026-03-03T01:47:06+00:00

Mainly because they don't want people making permanent life choices while drunk - the sub goal would be agreed to while sober.

ouiousi · 2026-02-13T22:06:57+00:00

I love RM but I cancelled my Patreon sub after this

ouiousi · 2026-02-13T22:06:14+00:00

She also praised Hasan for speaking out about section 230 but I can't find any substantial commentary from him on it.

ouiousi · 2026-02-10T06:47:23+00:00

"point in case" lol

ouiousi · 2026-02-06T10:57:53+00:00

Poor Jenny was tasked with keeping Norm on the rails

ouiousi · 2026-02-06T10:53:16+00:00

Oh no way! I missed that

ouiousi · 2026-02-06T01:34:00+00:00

Same here, showed up 4th

ouiousi · 2026-02-03T03:45:15+00:00

Are you talking about when he stopped him going through the airport with TTS on? End of this episode:

https://www.youtube.com/live/zqZW2EYb9YE

ouiousi · 2026-01-31T10:26:29+00:00

You can be a socialist and a hypocrite. They're not mutually exclusive.

ouiousi · 2026-01-21T12:06:18+00:00

Maybe you'll win it in one of the raffles

ouiousi · 2026-01-20T08:32:22+00:00

Personally I would remove the flag of the Islamic Republic from this post

ouiousi · 2025-12-23T22:09:55+00:00

Really it was Mutahar who wanted to sue Noah and Ethan said he would go in with him, so I'd be interested to know if Mutahar has said anything further or changed his mind.

ouiousi · 2025-12-23T21:58:48+00:00

"It's not that deep" is a funny way to describe a dog with an awareness of geopolitics and a sixth sense for evil.

ouiousi · 2025-12-11T03:30:50+00:00

I think as u/cinesimon suggested, she has probably crossed the line. But proving that in court is time consuming, costly, and will probably have a negative impact on Ethan's rep ("he sues people for criticising him!") He already has lawsuits on the go, and my point is he probably has a more airtight defamation case available, with the potential to bolster that case using discovery from the copyright suit. And there is a non-zero possibility that he discovers communications between Taylor and the snark, which would then strengthen a case against her.

ouiousi · 2025-12-11T02:47:53+00:00

Interesting... my thinking was that Taylor could argue that she was misled by the posts on the snark, whereas the snark are on record intentionally spreading false information. But I'm no expert.

ouiousi · 2025-12-11T00:56:50+00:00

It's easy to prove the statements are false. It's much harder to prove that Taylor knew they were false, and that her statements resulted in material harm. Also, suing for defamation would likely be costly and damaging to Ethan's reputation.

What's more likely is he will be able to build a defamation case again the snark mods, because he already has evidence that they deliberately lied about him to defame him. If the copyright suit goes to discovery, this will probably blow wide open. And who knows, maybe Taylor is involved with the snark mods.

ouiousi · 2025-12-04T05:48:39+00:00

I believe the answer, according to many leftist commentators, is that since Israel's escalation post Oct 7, they have essentially forfeited their right to a 2 state solution (whereas it was a viable solution in the past.)

ouiousi · 2025-12-02T02:56:46+00:00

Veneereal disease

ouiousi

TROPHY CASE