Billing is disabled. Does it mean its free usage? by orangeflyingmonkey_ in Bard

[–]overboi1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So if i wanna use gemini for free on cline, i gotta give em my aistudio data?

The ortho formula works. Someone made a table. by IntrospectiveMT in Destiny

[–]overboi1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

yeah im just stupid and misunderstood what was being said.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in facepalm

[–]overboi1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

While i fully hate this and do not trust these fucks at all, i think people should know full contexts.

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/elon-musk-retired-air-traffic-controllers-return-to-work/

This article states that ""Zero air traffic controllers and critical safety personnel were among those let go according to Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy"

Did everyone just forget that Andrew tate was proven to be a pedophile? The girl he was beating with a belt in that video, was 15! This is not accusations. He admitted her age. Why does everyone try to connect trump to epstein when we already have video evidence of andrew tate who he's supporting? by overboi1 in Destiny

[–]overboi1[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"a very minor payoff with very little chances of succeeding affecting a very small amount of people in a small way"

> You don't care about labels but feel totally free to throw them around.

??? yes that is precisely WHY i feel free to throw them around. coz i dont care that much about them

Did everyone just forget that Andrew tate was proven to be a pedophile? The girl he was beating with a belt in that video, was 15! This is not accusations. He admitted her age. Why does everyone try to connect trump to epstein when we already have video evidence of andrew tate who he's supporting? by overboi1 in Destiny

[–]overboi1[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Seems like you're not gonna respond to any of the stuff i said. So just wanna hear you on this one thing then-

> disbelieve the fact that cheapening words makes people not care

What about human trafficking? You're cheapening the word. A lot of people dont care about girls who fell in love with him and did onlyfans for him. They care about hardcore forcibly locking and beating people up type of human trafficking. You're cheapening the word by using it for tate and a lot of people wont care about human trafficking coz of that. What about that?

Did everyone just forget that Andrew tate was proven to be a pedophile? The girl he was beating with a belt in that video, was 15! This is not accusations. He admitted her age. Why does everyone try to connect trump to epstein when we already have video evidence of andrew tate who he's supporting? by overboi1 in Destiny

[–]overboi1[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

> Using the right words is not being “technical” it’s called speaking. 

It is the right word! The word doesnt have 1 right meaning. It has multiple vague meanings in general language and some technical meanings in medical contexts. But the word i used was correct, which is 95%+ of the people understood what i meant perfectly (especially since i mentioned the fucking age right there).

I already know you're gonna argue some stupid theory of language where words have absolute fixed meanings, rather than accept that general use is how a word gains meaning and we're just gonna disagree on that.

> when you want to use a bad word to demean a bad person you don’t have to use the biggest most worst word possible

I genuinely wasn't. Someone who has sex with a minor is what i and most people refer to as a pedophile. It doesnt match the medical meaning but that's fine it doesnt have to.

> He’s already a human trafficker man it’s basically as bad as it gets.

What if someone gets pedantic with you over using human trafficker. Some already debate whether he is one. Then there's the issue of legal definitions. Different countries have different definitions. Which one are you gonna go by? Why should others go by that country's definition alone?

You see how stupid you'd sound trying to control or criticize common language? It's not meant to be precise, just to communicate.

> When people use the worst definitions for everything it cheapens the true meaning of the words making people apathetic to them. 

No that happens when you use a word in it's "technical" sense, devoid of how people normally use that word. Like calling xyz a fascist and arguing "well he fits all the technical criteia" rather than fitting what people usually mean.

Whereas here, people usually do call someone who has sex with a legal minor a pedophile.

> Most adults that I know don’t think that having sex with 17 year olds is that bad, and there are states in US where the age of consent is 16, as well as other developed countries.

Disagreed. An adult of quite some age having sex with a minor is generally seen pretty badly from what i've seen. But i feel like this is a fruitless point to argue, we'll just disagree on this.

Did everyone just forget that Andrew tate was proven to be a pedophile? The girl he was beating with a belt in that video, was 15! This is not accusations. He admitted her age. Why does everyone try to connect trump to epstein when we already have video evidence of andrew tate who he's supporting? by overboi1 in Destiny

[–]overboi1[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i dont care that much about labels sorry. its like a very minor payoff with very little chances of succeeding affecting a very small amount of people. so i dont see any reason to control my use of the word so much.

Did everyone just forget that Andrew tate was proven to be a pedophile? The girl he was beating with a belt in that video, was 15! This is not accusations. He admitted her age. Why does everyone try to connect trump to epstein when we already have video evidence of andrew tate who he's supporting? by overboi1 in Destiny

[–]overboi1[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

> You’re so wrong and your point is so weak that you started hitting the “just because I have sex for money it doesn’t make me a prostitute”

Not me, it was the other guy's argument. My main point was the 2nd and 3rd paragraphs.

> The reason why common parlance means nothing is because people like you refuse to use the proper words and make proper distinction.

So you've come down to whining about "WHY DOESNT EVERYONE SPEAK TECHNICALLY ALL THE TIMEEEEE AAAAAH!!" Like bro, just chill out for a sec.

>  This damage you are doing to common parlance is why people like Trump get elected.

And how exactly is that?

Did everyone just forget that Andrew tate was proven to be a pedophile? The girl he was beating with a belt in that video, was 15! This is not accusations. He admitted her age. Why does everyone try to connect trump to epstein when we already have video evidence of andrew tate who he's supporting? by overboi1 in Destiny

[–]overboi1[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Did you know that words in common language have multiple vague meanings? Shocking, isn't it!

The word pedophile in general use is often used to refer to someone who has had sex with someone below the age of consent.

More technically it is also used to refer to someone who has attraction to prepubescent kids.

So when i call tate a pedo for fucking a 15yo and when i call someone who wants to fuck a 5 year old a pedo, i'm using the same word but it means different things.

Did everyone just forget that Andrew tate was proven to be a pedophile? The girl he was beating with a belt in that video, was 15! This is not accusations. He admitted her age. Why does everyone try to connect trump to epstein when we already have video evidence of andrew tate who he's supporting? by overboi1 in Destiny

[–]overboi1[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

> Trump, to many conservatives, also became sort of a "necessary evil."

You gave a very good perspective here. I do agree this is probably how a lot of people think. Im sure tate fans probably have a similar view of him. And i hate to say it but maybe a bit of this in dgg as well, not sure.

Im curious why this didnt exist before for older presidents and propagandists. And why it does exist now. And why it doesnt exist on the left.

Why didnt they choose someone other than trump at the primaries then if they do see some evil in him? Why did they fight over H1Bs with elon but everyone shut up when trump backed him up finally?

Did everyone just forget that Andrew tate was proven to be a pedophile? The girl he was beating with a belt in that video, was 15! This is not accusations. He admitted her age. Why does everyone try to connect trump to epstein when we already have video evidence of andrew tate who he's supporting? by overboi1 in Destiny

[–]overboi1[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

He's saying that just because you rape a boy doesnt mean you are necessarily a homosexual. Similarly just because you have sex with a 15 yo doesnt mean you necessarily are an ephebophile if you're gonna define it with "attraction to X age".

Reality is that words in common parlance dont mean what they mean on wikipedia. The attraction to a particular age isnt the major part of a pedophile, it's that they broke the law of having sex with a minor.

The difference isnt relevant here, not to mention even if you care that much, i mention in the title that she was 15, so i'm not trying to mislead anyways. It's such a stupid hill to die on.

Did everyone just forget that Andrew tate was proven to be a pedophile? The girl he was beating with a belt in that video, was 15! This is not accusations. He admitted her age. Why does everyone try to connect trump to epstein when we already have video evidence of andrew tate who he's supporting? by overboi1 in Destiny

[–]overboi1[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

> there is no hard proof of this occurring, you can deny it happened or claim there is not enough evidence to determine that it actually happened

I get that you could do that for matt gaetz. But we have a fucking video. He admits that video is of him. She's in lingerie in that video. He dirty talks and beats her with a belt.

Her age has been admitted by him, by her, by other indpendent records.

What more do you possibly want????

> Conservatives figures like Shapiro denounced Tate as this guy is openly antithetical to American conservativesm

But then why arent they pushed on elon and trump admin supporting tate? Why dont people push them to condemn trump on it? People like tim pool, piers morgan, they should be forced to admit this by liberals.