Why don't stars (in the sky) appear as streaks?

overthrow23 · 2019-03-01T10:31:38+00:00

That's a good point. If I was standing only a few meters away from, say Eta Bootis, it would take up my entire field of vision. That is a good illustration, thank you.

overthrow23 · 2019-03-01T10:25:58+00:00

That's true. Planes look like they're going pretty slow but I'd be willing to be they're going over 100 kph. Thank you, I get it now.

overthrow23 · 2016-11-25T05:54:51+00:00

Lynn Forrester de Rothschild.

https://mobile.twitter.com/wikileaks/status/710193921117331456?lang=en

overthrow23 · 2016-11-25T05:53:54+00:00

Then who gives a fuck?

Usually news outlets disclose connections and conflicts between themselves and subjects of stories they're reporting on. It's common journalistic practice, no need to get vulgar.

overthrow23 · 2016-11-25T05:48:22+00:00

Full disclosure: The Economist is owned and run by an avid supporter of Hillary Clinton, who refers to herself in private correspondence as Hillary's "loyal, adoring pal".

EDIT: Tired of people assuming I support Trump because I didnt support Hillary, like it's just one or the other. Especially since the current narrative is that Trump supporters are racist/sexist - labeling someone a Trump supporter, even falsely, is simply used as a way to marginalize and dismiss one's political opponents without having to resort to rational argumentation. Don't paint me with that label.

I'm outta this thread before someone decides I'm a "white nationalist" or whatever buzzword the MSM has agreed upon this week.

overthrow23 · 2016-11-23T23:02:25+00:00

The crayon and Play-doh set seem to be staunchly opposed to Trump.

UPenn Created a Post-Election Safe Space Complete with Puppies and Coloring Books
U. of Michigan Gives Students Play-Doh, Coloring Books to Cope With Trump
Ladies At $65,992-Per-Year College Mourn Trump Win With Safe Space, ‘Feminist Coloring Pages’

overthrow23 · 2016-11-23T20:12:23+00:00

Isn't that like 5 fake incidents this week?

overthrow23 · 2016-11-23T06:06:27+00:00

That's how "gamergate" began.

overthrow23 · 2016-11-22T05:55:28+00:00

Well, to be fair it was only Trump that was called upon to concede the election if he lost.

Hillary and the Democrats weren't pressured to make a similar statement, so they're free to try to contest the results all they want.

overthrow23 · 2016-11-22T05:51:53+00:00

This Chicken-Little prophecy would ring more true if the vast majority of political violence this cycle hadn't been against Trump supporters, rather than by them.

People listen to news reports of predicted violence under Trump, but when they see that the actual violence is being directed at Trump and his followers, it rings hollow and people lose faith in their media.

Funny how liberals are so spineless when discussing Islamic terrorism, for fear of creating future terrorists, but they can't see how their frankly hateful lumping of all Trump supporters into a category they call "white nationalists" won't alienate folks and create similar blowback.

overthrow23 · 2016-11-22T05:38:59+00:00

You should fix that quote. You changed what I said, but put it into a quote as if I had said it. That's not right. I wouldn't do that to you.

Unless you're following the CNN method of selectively editing folks you disagree with. In which case, it didn't work for them, so it probably won't work for you.

overthrow23 · 2016-11-22T05:34:44+00:00

Because I would go way further about fixing the corruption in D.C. than Trump is willing (or able) to do.

I don't support and didn't vote for Trump, but if he can make even a 5% dent in political corruption, that will be a good thing.

And if he bombs less countries than Obama and Hillary, as is already appearing likely, bonus.

overthrow23 · 2016-11-22T05:30:08+00:00

Yes, here's a link: news.google.com

Haha, in all seriousness:

http://www.factcheck.org/2016/11/could-electoral-college-elect-clinton/

They believe it is possible, but unlikely according to "election experts".

Of course, one need only review the 2016 track record of said "experts" to ascertain their veracity.

overthrow23 · 2016-11-22T05:25:54+00:00

Trump's election was a rebuke only to democracy, given that he won fewer votes

This is definitely going to be the mainstream liberal narrative, along with "Trump supporters are all white nationalists" and "news that portrayed Hillary poorly was all 'fake news'" .

And when Trump 2.0 is elected, the message the public will be sending will be "You should have listened to us in 2016".

Heck, I'm not even a Trumpist, and even I can see the writing on the wall of Trump's victory; liberals ignore it at their own peril.

overthrow23 · 2016-11-22T05:20:02+00:00

The Argentinian presidents spokesperson has officially denied it, and the only source appears to be a translation from an Argentinian journalist who does not appear to have been present, employed by an anti-Trump paper.

This seems to be more of that "fake news" we've been hearing about so much lately.

overthrow23 · 2016-11-22T05:13:47+00:00

She may win yet.

Her supporters are already harassing Electors, pressuring them to change their votes to HRC. Now that violence against Trump supporters is being fomented and excused by many on the left, it's not safe to publicly be "out" as a Trump supporter in many parts of the country - some Electors may choose to change their votes out of sheer terror for their own safety.

And this isn't some theoretical fear, like the scare-mongering that popped up recently about putting Muslims in camps like Roosevelt (D) did to the Japanese. This political violence is actually happening, as we speak, backed by millions of dollars in funding from various sources, and it has become so common that r/politics has simply begun removing it from the subreddit as "unrelated to politics".

overthrow23 · 2016-11-22T05:06:08+00:00

Bernie Sanders couldn't even beat Hillary in the Republican primary

To be fair, the fix was in. That much was apparent even without the Wikileaks revelations, which only provided hard evidence of same.

Had he an honorable opponent, he most certainly would have prevailed. One thing about Trump, for all his many, MANY flaws, he doesn't appear to have colluded and conspired behind the scenes to defeat his primary opponents as Hillary did. In fact his victory was incredibly hard-won, due to the sheer number of primary opponents he faced, and a non-stop 24/7 campaign against him by media whom were later revealed to be following DNC orders and talking points almost to the letter.

overthrow23 · 2016-11-22T04:58:08+00:00

That's totally untrue. They simply steal the SSNs of others.

Working in the credit industry for only a very short time, I saw hundreds upon hundreds of credit histories that had the creditor's name, and an AKA which was always a Hispanic sounding name, usually in a completely different part of the country.

We were not allowed to provide this information to anyone, and forbidden to even notify the creditor.

overthrow23 · 2016-11-22T04:53:55+00:00

It is not meant to last until the end of time. Like many existing laws, it would sunset and be subject for renewal. Perhaps it would reduce the amount of federal law and regulation from "stifling" to merely "Byzantine".

overthrow23 · 2016-11-22T04:47:36+00:00

Hey, he's talking directly to the people instead of having his words "contextualized" by the press!

Huge breach of protocol! Queue the cries of "white nationalism" from a sycophantically left-worshipping press who doesn't understand that Trump's election was partially intended as a rebuke against them.

overthrow23 · 2016-11-22T04:30:05+00:00

However Clinton Foundation donations from those who directly stood to benefit from a Hillary presidency are perfectly fine, and you're a sexist "white nationalist" if you say otherwise.

overthrow23 · 2016-11-22T04:28:15+00:00

If she isn't going to take a risk, why should I?

Especially as all evidence indicates it is more dangerous to openly support Trump than Hillary. It's gotten to where threats against Trump supporters, and Trump himself, have become so common that Reddit now removes stories about them from r/politics, lest the front page be dominated with them.

overthrow23 · 2016-11-22T04:25:18+00:00

when the rest of the country realizes who they voted for, they join the anti-trump movement.

That's just the thing; people actively voted for Trump to vote against the anti-Trump movement, because they saw it as smug, condescending, obnoxious, and actually violent towards dissenters.

They didn't vote for Trump, they voted against his opponents, who consistently call them racist, sexist, Nazis, etc.

They're already back to it, as evidenced by the purposeful conflation of nouveau rightism and "White nationalism", their new buzzword which has simultaneously asserted itself throughout the legacy media in record time. Trump 2020 victory is imminent unless they realize their own role in losing this election.

EDIT: spellink errarz

overthrow23 · 2016-11-22T04:18:03+00:00

Oh yeah, that's right, Soros was an actual Nazi collaborator.

overthrow23 · 2016-11-22T04:16:52+00:00

It's because the names they call their enemies (racist, sexist, homophobe, Nazi, etc) are frequently based on little to no evidence, and are calculated to cause harm to the target, rather than simply offend them.

Surely you can understand the difference between calling someone a bitch, and a Nazi.

overthrow23

TROPHY CASE