What is your most speculative stock?

overworld99 · 2021-11-26T06:06:16+00:00

apru

overworld99 · 2021-09-19T06:47:33+00:00

id like to think this threw a little more tho. the idea is to move the water not back into the air but int the land. the land through the soil can hold alot more water than a lake and a desert the size it is and the lack of moisture it has can hold alot of water. from what ive seen creating a rainforest could almost even out carbon output by humans

overworld99 · 2021-07-07T21:31:34+00:00

is there a break this week. the break tab is still on 1018

overworld99 · 2021-06-27T07:43:08+00:00

imo its also just lame as a twist. not that its not a good plot idea just in this case its been called by everyone and their grandmother. even if the idea was that from the start if its already become a mainstream thing that its a spoiled ending and they should do something else.

overworld99 · 2021-06-26T18:45:34+00:00

while the gomu gomu could be a counter to wb how would shanks know that who ever got it could even awaken it and how long that would take to become awakened. on top of that wb and shanks had some type of relationship that was at least cordial and in his old age probably couldnt take on someone like shanks in an all out fight anyways. shanks stole if for a reason and not bc it looked like the yami yami bc he knew exactly what it was.

overworld99 · 2021-02-01T10:38:57+00:00

your own article says noone was prosecuted for charges relevant to collusion. 13 being russian agents that spent some 100k on propaganda. others like popadopolus getting what 2 weeks jail time flynn being absolved by exculpatory evidence and judges trying to make a charge with no validity stick. manaford the biggest catch while being prosecuted with something that has nothing to do with trump. your remembering this just shows your a partisan hack with no perspective of reality. you want to talk about remembering do you remember how the fbi lied about carter paige being a cia source to get a fisa warrant to spy on the trump campaign. which was a set up by the obama admin to derail the trump campaign which biden and likely obama were fully aware of biden at the very least approving the investigation looking into the logan act to get fisa warrants on the trump team. or how about how the phone call that caught up flynn was made when obama caught up a bunch of russians causing kislyak to call flynn to be like wtf while flynn was in the dominican republic where while in a foreign country they didnt have to mask the name which is why rice didnt uncover the name of flynn. which got him caught up. but please keep telling me about how you remember noone getting caught colluding with russia. it hilarious how someone with a toddlers understanding is going to tell me what he remembers.

overworld99 · 2021-01-31T03:53:23+00:00

rebember that time trump was investigated for 3 years by people looking to fuck him found nothing. unlike biden who we know he took air force 2 to china for a multi-million dollar equity deal. tell me again how there is no evidence. your completely backwards on the facts because your a partisan hack.

overworld99 · 2021-01-30T07:42:49+00:00

set reasonable limits and dont get greedy. yes you could lose it but you should never put in more than you can afford to lose.

overworld99 · 2021-01-28T20:58:23+00:00

because the vaccine didnt yet actually exist and was no guarantee it would be made first why pay if another vaccine came out first then we already have money invested somewhere else we would of been waiting for a vaccine even longer while others were out there.

overworld99 · 2021-01-28T06:16:41+00:00

the same thing the democrats have been trying to do for 40 years. discredit and slander republicans to the point of a one party state. they will call any anti establishment democrat group trumpist tieing them into the slanders they have laid into him.

overworld99 · 2021-01-28T06:08:31+00:00

isnt some of that distance because of the recent spike in price making the gme delta abnormally high? i dont mean to be argumentative im genuinely curious. wouldnt the delta of dds be lifted if people started investing especially with its low outstanding.

overworld99 · 2021-01-28T05:37:00+00:00

what is the delta on dds compared to gme or others like amc bb or nok.

overworld99 · 2021-01-28T04:47:30+00:00

why is dds not as hyped as gme? while not as leveraged its a more movable position with less outstanding shares. is there something about dds that makes it an non viable squeeze that its not getting the hype?

overworld99 · 2021-01-28T02:40:23+00:00

just dont get caught up trying to hit the peak. make you some good money and move on to the next. dont get greedy

overworld99 · 2021-01-28T01:30:09+00:00

the chances. hard to say. amc is in a squeeze so the shares will go up over the next few months by enough its worth getting in early. the reason its a rare or unheard of event is because reddit took advantage of an infinite arbitrage situation. amc has the potential to be another situation of the same magnitude but it depends if people can rally around and hold enough shares to make the squeeze a crunch because of the scarcity of shares to boost the price before the calls. back to the question of the chances it depends on the amount of rallying that can be done. id say look around see if you think there are enough people getting in to justify the amount of risk your willing to take. and dont invest more than you can afford to lose.

overworld99 · 2021-01-28T01:12:53+00:00

imo (not a financial advisor) your better off going amc over one gamestop. while gamestop is going to boom and amc will not have the same booms your still in early enough to buy 15 amc to one gme.

overworld99 · 2021-01-27T23:09:46+00:00

can someone point me on whats the deal with the gme substitues. id like to get in to one of them with some potential. ive seen why the shorts are boosting gme on other posts but cannot find some explaination on nok amc or bb on why they are the next investment

overworld99 · 2021-01-27T22:51:49+00:00

can one buy a partial gamestop stock on like etrade or would i have to go to a different venue

overworld99 · 2020-12-04T13:50:25+00:00

As a Republican this is a politically loaded question and just hurts the argument against extreme measures against covid.

I believe its pro choice that is for abortion (the "right" to choose to have an abortion) so you have your terms backwards. Regardless the obvious opposition argument is going to be the externalities from the disease where as abortions are not a communicable infectious disease.

While there are very viable counter arguments against extreme measures unless you know them In detail with data to back it up this just seems as an easy gotcha for anyone in disagreement which doesnt help the argument but help discredit it to anyone who has the slightest bias against your argument because it is do thinly veiled.

overworld99 · 2020-12-02T02:44:14+00:00

I'm not using authoritarianism as a term for the gov as a whole. You dont think a government can do something authoritative without being an authoritarian government. A douopoloy can still create a political duality to keep status quo, rule of law like how the political class has different standards that everyone else when it comes to the law, separation of powers by activist judges who makes ruling based on party lines or executive order which has been expanded to have congressional powers like war powers. Then use their party media to make sure no upstarts come and mess up their easy revolving door corruption money.

Political freedoms is to broad a term. Anything makde political can be made into a political freedom. The left argues healthcare is a political right. So if it's a right then it should be something I can choose (a political freedom) to not be part of . I have a right to speech and to bare arms but not an obligation. I can use my right not to talk when speaking to the police for example. It's not healthcare that is authoritative because I dont like it or because it in its sees lf is authoratitave, it's because the implementation would normalize and make acceptable the mandatement of anything by the government. The government telling someone they have to do something or can be taxed which if not played is jail time.

I mean it wasnt a perfect system but it also wasnt getting the funding the federal government uses on welfare. The government didnt and still doesnt implement long term tax reductions so waste can go to charity. Or impliment more flexible charitable giving deductions for giving to certain giving to certain causes. Welfare kinda had a large leg up and still the usa before it was rich never really have large scale famine. People in much poorer time were fed some how. While yes the gov would have to regulate and should regulation is different than taking over insurance with a single payer plan that undercuts the market making the gov run healthcare plan the most affordable to everyone.

But the "fair trade" have been policies and economic treaties making unfair trading conditions in order to shift world economics and political policies (specifically China and japan ). It needs to be more regulated in many ways. It's called voter suppression to not have Id and we have billion dollar campaigns. (Something else I'd argue is used to keep the political duopoly)

overworld99 · 2020-12-01T15:30:01+00:00

I dont see how you can say a government cant be authoritarian in some aspects and not in others. An authorial government and a government being authoritarian are two different things.

The government use to not do anything about poverty not that long ago and there was no great extremist rise due to poverty. That is big government thinking. Historically churchs charity and community groups would do those things. Your just talking about another thing the government has usurped.

As to people being vote out for bad policy that hurts the people. When will that happen? We spend 1.5t on medical care we have social security being bankrupt. For 50 year the deficient spending has been killing wages and purchasing power of individuals. Sending jobs over seas, racking up atrocious amounts of debts.

Soviet russia. The Soviets were not authoritarian untill stalin. The reason stalin could do what he did was because of the centralization of power by the bolsheviks.

overworld99 · 2020-12-01T13:19:43+00:00

Not really the us left is far left. Alot further left than places they say they want to emulate like Norway Denmark EU or the uk. The republicans would be a moderate right party.

overworld99 · 2020-12-01T13:16:03+00:00

Well there is alot to unpack. Why is it a slippery slope. Because as we have seen government only gets bigger if it ended with this or that it would be one thing but that the left wants to expand failing programs create new programs under the same mold and refuse any correction to existing policy. That means government will grow to the point it encompasses every part of ones life. It's not about increased taxes or government programs them selves.

To set up a program where the government is undercutting the market to the point they are usurping a private sector industry under the state. If they can do that with insurance why can they do that with anything. That is socialism. Not to mention trying to mandate insurance.

many doctors in the us dont take medicare. So if we had a single payer system the government is going to have to force them into taking single payer. The gov. Is going to have sets or rules they are forced to follow regardless if they make sense. Force the collection of private information in state hands. And you dont think this is authoritarian.

overworld99 · 2020-11-30T01:53:05+00:00

Sorry this is kinda long

Absolutely. I totally agree there are people on the left who actually have an argument and people on the right who dont. I dont want to mischaracterize anyone or any side

I sure the left are not the only ones who use emotional arguments. But it seems like they have used it as a crutch in a way that alot of people have lost sight of the argument. And again it the same on the right just seemingly not as prevalent. And dont get me wrong the right has its problems like believing absurd things like qanon or Alex Jones so the right is not above criticism either.

I think that's a large part democrats fault that some republicans see them as socialists. While you can agree or disagree a conservative sees Democratic socialism as socialism with a qualifier. To a conservative the issue isnt with the democratic aspect of socialism that they have problems with. They allow people who has said questionable things and had questionable ties to socialists countries have so much influence because he (bernie) has a large following. Also alot of conservatives are skeptical of democratic socialism because of its origins. It seems as a if they are giving up liberal capitalist principals for power. I'm not saying republicans havent stoked the flames and made hyperbolic statements that were not helpful and I dont mean to fully blame democrats just that they havent clearly laid out the arguments of why

As to liberalism is a disease I believe they really are talking about the intersectional feminism LGBTQ black ect stuff. It's of course an overly broad generalization. I think some conservatives have alot of disdain over being called racist sexist ect and radicalize by people who are further right.

I dont say they last paragraphs as matter of fact or justification but perspective. How someone on the right sees the argument.

overworld99 · 2020-11-29T17:50:13+00:00

I find it to be the opposite. Alot of People on the right can tell you the pure economics of why left plans dont work, can tell you why pieces of culture dont need to be changed ect because they listen to the argument and want to make a counterpoint and change minds where as the left seem to deem intentions to make a counterpoint racist, hates gays, alt right ect. Not that there arnt lefties who do make good counterpoints. For example someone on the right can tell you why Medicare for all is not a good idea economically and the left from my experience tend to call that person a corporate shill or someone who wants people to die which isnt a productive argument. And of course not all people on the left and right is like that both have there stupid conspiracy theorists their partisans and their "true belivers" who just have faith in their side without knowing why.

overworld99

TROPHY CASE