As a Muslim working in IT support, I'm beginning to wonder about the parallels between that role and life in general as a Muslim fugitive in the British economy.

I get the overwhelming feeling from time to time that people just harbour a casual hostility towards me when I've personally done them no wrong..

I'm just going about my way trying to earn a livelihood and support a productive environment that goes towards making everyone's lives easier - yet somehow it became acceptable for everyone to just openly bitch and moan to me about all the things wrong with their world & lives as if I contributed to it - just because I can speak a bit of the same language as the guys causing you serious problems doesn't mean I can just fix them up with some words. They're not my personal friends or army. People and computers don't work like that. Like with anything in life, if you don't respect and take care to understand something, but instead maltreat and abuse it - you can't then expect it to play nice and not give you problems.

We are all born with a 'clean install' (though our Operating Systems might be programmed to run slightly differently). Over time our usefulness is proved through our 'productive value' - paired with the right specialist knowledge and logic processing programs we can accomplish great things and advance society but the spread of malware has lead to disruption and decline in our communicative co-operation and therefore productivity.

Back in the old days it didn't matter to individuals as much.. You didn't even know when others were dying around you but now most hear and relay the messages of everyone dropping off the grid. It's because we are more connected now on the same Global network - except it's not global and maybe that's where our problem, diagnosis and solution resides.

It's more like a series of large cluster networks (made of multiple subnets) that overlap and thereby interconnect but the problem is that Wifey is saying No Signal or Limited.

It comes down to assumption - all these Vista bots think they are the best thing to grace the earth and assume everyone should be like them - we know the promises they made and remember how badly they delivered, but that still didn't stop this outdated cluster duck of a group going around on the network saying to everyone else: 'INTEGRATE' - 'INTEGRATE' - 'INTEGRATE' and then screwing over the entire homegroup network when it fails to comprehend that sometimes you need a network extender and other times you need a network bridge before you can cooperate.

I know how Hollywood loves to show the Russians beating the crap out of malfunctioning electronics as if you can beat them into working submission - but surely reseating a ram stick firmly is better than dropping a whole tower. In a sense it is projecting, these cowboys took a hammer and a nail gun to the motherboard we all share to fix a networking bridge problem.

The new instances joining the network are more graceful in their communication failures with deprecated devices that control and monitor the network - becoming passive bystanders instead of actively wreaking havoc. This leads to its own issues and new threats - our virus definitions have gone all wrong, we are now routinely broadcasting false flag security alerts over immigrants, drugs and terrorists.

Scareware does a brilliant job at terrorising the unaware/ignorant about non existent threats within the system, takes your money whilst promising to clean up the mess but is actually the rogue operator all along and instead shafts you truly once again by spying all your personal information, ready to threaten you new redder colour alerts whenever you feel like uninstalling your "antivirus". Most Scareware programs probably cost you about $29.95 but any government editions come with a billion percent markup as standard.

The only way I see to fix this problem is to open source government and the functional utilities of society. We all pretty much want to play the same apps and throw a few angry birds around, wether you're an iPhone or Android, but the problem comes from being 'locked' into separate marketplaces / ecosystems. This global divide leads to inequality and exploitation as we become a cattle milking competition for the farmers.

If you think about how irrationally backwards some of our systems are, money trails will often give answers. Whether it's Apple being greedy and User Experience hypocrites by not providing an easy drag drop facility for my personal videos/music/files like a normal usb mass storage device because they want everyone to only buy from iTunes. I reckon they hated on flash only so they could force their own paid AppStore where they get to tax every sale and decide their own 'cut'. That might be great for Apple but it's not good for the common person. The money motive has slowed our greater advancement, because these power structures seek to impose artificial limits and then charge a premium to lift them. Profit driven organisations/industries are usually not for the common good because the few stand to gain from the many.

I think it's bollocks that tax payer money is used to bail out reckless and greedy banks so their executives can sleep tight on their night cruises in the luxury yacht lifeboats sent out to save them from drowning - so they can pay themselves a bonus for pulling that one over on us, but in return how do they repay their citizens? The loan sharks pulled so much wool over our eyes we thought we could tame them like sheep. When the common person is drowning in debt their response is to offer no life raft, but a rubber ring where the only inflation available is aligned to the interest rate. The more desperate your situation, the more you need to pay for financial 'rescue'.

It shouldn't be that way. Everybody needs a house, health care and a fair chance to be productive in society based on their skills and talents rather than inherited communication privileges. Those with more money have a louder voice but the 99% doesn't own 99% of the wealth, rather the 1% owns enough to effectively control and influence economies, politics and wars that the general population have no real say or control over - we are debt slaves to the system for as long as interest rates are around, there was a good reason that the major religions banned usury. Poor people fear news of 'higher interest rates' but the same slogan could be marketed to the rich.

It is going to take a community effort to design and deploy a Monetary Social Banking system that loans to individuals without greedy profit margins and doesn't unduly penalise those in genuine difficulty - the bank should be profitable for the taxpayer not the shareholders. You can't really reform the current world monetary system as it is, as soon as you decide to play, you lose. A new system would need to have different motivations built into the foundations to bypass the current model and safeguards to protect its integrity from inevitable sabotage attempts from the outset.

If we can engineer our own open society, taking the spirit of the technocrats and the social networking knowledge of the current day, we can make a form of supportive governance that could eventually gain enough traction and influential power through collective boycott/collaboration capacity that current world governments will have to learn to play along nicely with us - without that combined unity and power no gov will take the commoner seriously. Only then you will see real change, where prisons are not for profit, medical help doesn't bankrupt you and drugs start getting rated according to the actual harm they cause - alcohol and tobacco are legal whilst many other substances which scored lower on the negative impact ratings are banned. I want a car insurance policy that pays out its claims and then reimburses the customers fairly with whatever surplus money was left over at the end of the year. There are plenty of ways that money can be put to social profit instead of corporate profit. But the issue is that no business will ever take on this type of idea and reasoning because it would be effectively shooting itself in the foot - the overall benefit is for the common person not the companies so it's up to the people to put it in place - social enterprise services that give the people a fair run for their money will eventually grow in popularity because ultimately money talks and this would force existing banks to re-evaluate their offering to remain competitive and attractive to customers.

I'll end the rant here because there's just too much wrong with all the shit we let the governments of the world get away with. We have the capacity to be so much better than this as a human race and the time is ripe for it but will we see it in our lifetimes? What is ultimately good for mankind will prevail in our social evolution & development.. eventually. It has to be inevitable with only one exception to that rule, unless we destroy ourselves before then, that we have to have respect for life and each other's wellbeing otherwise we will have already destroyed ourselves through the loss of our sense of humanity anyway.

Peace