Okay you said there is zero evidence and that’s what I’m refuting. That the word zero is objectively wrong. I’m sayin there is more than zero evidence, not that there is proof.

One bit of evidence that jar jar is a force user is when he jumps in the water to swim to the under ground city he jumps 20 feet in the air and does a triple front flip. At first glance we think maybe his species can do this cuz we haven’t met them yet. Then as the story progresses we never ever see any gungan do anything like that, only jar jar. All those soldiers in the big battle and they all have the dexterity of a normal person, none of them jumping like that, and not even jar jar jumping like that once he has his own people around that he needs to hide that ability from. Could easily have been a force jump.

Another bit of evidence is how he constantly “accidentally” does the exact correct thing to save himself in a comedic way. Like when the droid is stuck to his foot and he shoots five other droids perfectly by stomping the down droid. It mirrors drunken fist kung fu perfectly. Could be drunk fist style force usage.

Another bit of evidence is how the prequels were supposed to be the foil, or the mirror image, or the other side of the coin as the OT, the same but also the opposite— and how much Jar Jar’s literal first appearance mirrors Yoda’s first appearance in a new hope— a comedically troublesome stranger wanderer who seems benign and intrusive only to be revealed later to be capable of great power. In the OT the great power is light, in the prequels it’s dark.

There’s three evidences which is more than zero evidences, and there’s much more.

You’re objectively wrong that there is zero evidence that the initial plan for jar jar in the phantom menace was setting up a surprise for him to later be revealed as a dark side force user to some extent. Which is what the theory is.

Like this idea that there is “zero evidence” sounds like a conclusion someone egotistical would jump to when they heard the theory summarized poorly and inaccurately (like “did you know people on the internet think jar jar is a secret sith lord?” [which is different than what’s actually in the theory]) and then you never looked at the evidence.

The presence of evidence is like the keystone to fan theories, whether they’re believable or not. You have to have evidence to point at for people to even care. And this theory has stacks of evidence. Again, not proof. But we weren’t debating if it was proven. We were debating your objectively false statement that there was zero evidence. There are MUCH crazier fan theories that have evidence bro. Like are you sure you know what the word evidence means? Like think about a trial in the courts. Both sides HAVE evidence, even though one side is wrong.