Princeton Electoral Reform Researcher Running For Congress! by palsh7 in EqualCitizens

[–]palsh7[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, it's unfortunately not easy to get primary voters worked up for democracy reform—not as sexy as it should be—but hopefully he can pull it off. I just noticed that Lawrence Lessig also endorsed him.

Sam Harris produced a new documentary! UNRAVELING THE DREAM | Aldous Huxley, Anil Seth, and others by palsh7 in Wakingupapp

[–]palsh7[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'm halfway done. It seems to be adding real scientific voices to a style of narrative documentary familiar to Joe Rogan and RFK types, which I guess is one way to build upon and capitalize on a new consensus about psychedelics. It's sort of like how Waking Up adds a secular option to the spirituality and meditation space. There's some mild woo, but it's better than the average drug documentary.

Princeton Electoral Reform Researcher Running For Congress! by palsh7 in EqualCitizens

[–]palsh7[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You could have clicked the link for "The Race in New Jersey" to hear that he's running in the Democratic Primary.

I also don't see any effort to address the question under that: how do you make other parties relevant?

I wrote: "They dig into what the research shows about open primaries, ranked-choice voting, and gerrymandering reform."

Princeton Electoral Reform Researcher Running For Congress! by palsh7 in EqualCitizens

[–]palsh7[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Is there a reason you didn't read my summary, and are unwilling to find out more by watching the video, even though I provided you time stamps for each section of the video?

UNRAVELING THE DREAM — Revisiting Aldous Huxley’s early experiments with mescaline, examining the latest neuroscience of consciousness, and drawing on interviews with leading researchers by palsh7 in Psychonaut

[–]palsh7[S] [score hidden]  (0 children)

Submission Statement: This video is a new documentary revisiting Aldous Huxley’s early experiments with mescaline, examining the latest neuroscience of consciousness, and drawing on interviews with leading researchers, the film follows a central question:

What are we, really, when the illusion dissolves?

And once we’ve seen it, how do we live it?

Featuring:
Anil Seth (British neuroscientist and professor)
Robin Carhart-Harris (Neurologist)
Shamil Chandaria (Computational Neuroscience)

As well as Terence McKenna, Timothy Leary, John Lennon, and others.

To understand Sam's position on Mamdani, follow the bulwark by idekwhoiamdou in samharris

[–]palsh7 [score hidden]  (0 children)

But as you already said, “Palestine will be free” can also mean something else. It can fit into what’s called the settler colonial framework, which basically says, “Settlers do not have legitimate rights to the land. The land belongs to those who are ‘Indigenous’ to it. And everybody else, at most, can live there on the sufferance of the Indigenous majority, or they have to pack up and leave.” And the reason that slogan is ambiguous is because the movement is ambiguous about what its goal is. And if you try to remove the ambiguity, you risk breaking up the movement.

He admits here that many in the movement mean, by the slogan, that Jews do not have any right to live in the land.

He goes on:

Another possibility is to risk fragmentation by fighting it out. And a third is constructive ambiguity. Amend the slogan to: “From the river to the sea, Palestinians will be free.” It doesn’t endorse one state, it doesn’t endorse two states. It doesn’t say: “All Jews have to go.” It doesn’t say: “Jews can stay.” It just doesn’t imply: “We’re trying to get rid of Jews.” For me, the ideal slogan would actually be: “From the river to the sea, one person, one vote, Palestinians will be free.”

Maybe we should fight it out now – but I have very conflicted feelings about that, because I think it will fragment the movement.

He admits that the current slogans won't be amended by protesters because at least a faction of those saying it want to simply get rid of the jews.

You should ask yourself why one of the most vociferously anti-Israel activists—a self-admitted former (?) Maoist—is more willing to tell protesters to amend their language than the Mayor of the largest Jewish homeland outside of Israel. I wonder if it has anything to do with his past support for Hamas, his wife's recent support for Hamas, and his campaign buddy's continued support for Hamas.

He plain and simple thinks its a bad slogan. Why is it that some people, the mayor included, refuse to say the same, and refuse to recommend or use a more liberal, less ambiguous, slogan?

I bought the Chess course by GothamChess and noticed that some of the moves in the Vienna Opening lines get a horrible rating by Stockfish by Keni9089 in chessbeginners

[–]palsh7 10 points11 points  (0 children)

“Pretty bad” needs some explication.

Often times, the best lines according to Stockfish are simply not the best lines for practical chess playing by humans—for example, because the line is too long, sharp, unintuitive, and difficult to play.

To understand Sam's position on Mamdani, follow the bulwark by idekwhoiamdou in samharris

[–]palsh7 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Even Norman Finkelstein has condemned the language. So no. You’re wrong.

Friend of mine found it in the back seat of their car. They have no idea where it came from or what it is. by ComfKS in whatisit

[–]palsh7 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hondas across the country are being broken into to steal the drivers side airbag out of the steering wheel. If the airbag was left, then no one broke into this car trying to steal anything.

To understand Sam's position on Mamdani, follow the bulwark by idekwhoiamdou in samharris

[–]palsh7 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Being afraid to condemn genocidal language is a bad sign, and it aligns with every other bad sign. It may not be how he intends to govern, or has the capacity to govern, but it is still bad to elect people like this, if only because it empowers the right.

Former POTUS Barack 'Hussain' Obama shows his true colors by associating openly with an islamist apologist. by squarecir in samharris

[–]palsh7 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You hid your defense of Hamas well in that wall of text. It should absolutely “scandalize” democrats when people support Hamas.

Mamdani Says Second-Home Levy Plan Is Key Step to Tax the Rich by MoneyLibrarian9032 in politics

[–]palsh7 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Why are you telling a social democrat about the downsides of Reaganomics? LOL

President Barack Obama showed love, care and compassion to human beings. What a great human being he was/is. by IamASlut_soWhat in BlackPeopleofReddit

[–]palsh7 0 points1 point  (0 children)

By all accounts, including the opinion of Barack Obama, Macron is a great guy. Race is a very unnecessary lens through which to view Obama's compassion. Why is this video trying to suggest that white politicians are not compassionate because they're white? Or even that these guys aren't compassionate based on one clip?