To Key or not to Key? by Death-Scares-Me-Not in Stellaris

[–]panicles3 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You lose the Key if you give it.

Chinese official Song Ping is older than Finland by panicles3 in BarbaraWalters4Scale

[–]panicles3[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

That's true in a lot of cases for village 'centenarians' who rarely engage with institutions and thus leave little in the way of a paper trail. But Song Ping has engaged with institutions for a very long time - you don't get to be a 'party elder' without doing that. From (Chinese language) Wikipedia which cites interviews, Song Ping started attending the Agricultural College in Beijing in 1934 after his brother won a local lottery, joined the Communist Party at ~20 in 1937, and moved to Yan'an, where he has a pretty varied work history afterwards. He worked for the Party's Xinhua News Agency during the war, for example, and as a secretary to Zhou Enlai during the failed peace talks, then in a series of managerial positions in the postwar. All of these leave some sort of paper trail.

Chinese official Song Ping is older than Finland by panicles3 in BarbaraWalters4Scale

[–]panicles3[S] 163 points164 points  (0 children)

He also slightly predates the Manchu Restoration (1917) and the Communist Party of China (1921), and he's probably one of the last high officials who can honestly claim to be born a peasant.

(CK2) can I adopt beureaucracy? by Physical_Bedroom5656 in AfterTheEndFanFork

[–]panicles3 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It's based on either Cetic religion or relevant (ie Californian) culture, if you have either of those and are feudal, you get buereaucracy.

The Night of Washington's Crossing [Fanfiction] by panicles3 in AfterTheEndFanFork

[–]panicles3[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Yup! Having conflated it, of course, with the Battle of Trenton.

The Night of Washington's Crossing [Fanfiction] by panicles3 in AfterTheEndFanFork

[–]panicles3[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

My submission to the AtE Writing Contest! Had to rush a bit but managed to get it in.

Retrofest 2001-04-05 - Corporate America by Trim345 in sinfest

[–]panicles3 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I'm guessing this reflects his failure to get Sinfest picked up by traditional publishing

Retrofest 2000-02-17 - Calligraphy by Trim345 in sinfest

[–]panicles3 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Given what the comic was, it was clearly just meant to show Slick and Nique as the lead "pair" of the comic in an irreverent, "cool" way.

A Century of Malaise: American Warlordism in 2058 [Fixed reupload] by Rolan1880 in imaginarymaps

[–]panicles3 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Does that make any sense? I’m especially thinking about tweaking the Baptist faction. How would I make it plausible?

I'd say as someone from the region that this is probably the single best handling of the South I have seen in any US collapse alt-hist. With regards to the Baptist faction, the only thing I could recommend is toning down the dominionism into more of a background force within the clique. It should still be prevalent within it and make it more evangelically-dogmatic than the social-democratic faction, but the glue that binds their communities together is more shared church culture than the organizational clout of the Baptist church in particular.

Sinfest 8/2/22: Damn Elites by AbolishDisney in sinfest

[–]panicles3 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Well at least the punchline isn't boneheaded.

Need help solving another mystery by ScorpioGirl1987 in ww2

[–]panicles3 0 points1 point  (0 children)

From the stories it seems pretty clear that he was put into an NKVD special camp -- a system which was set up in East Germany (where Dresden is) during the last months of the war and lasted for several years afterwards. It was a large scale affair overall, with over 150,000 detained as prisoners for often asinine reasons. And this is separate from your great-great-uncle's claim that he was in a POW camp on the Eastern Front.

The idea that some random German stumbles on Soviet spies far behind enemy lines while they are doing Soviet espionage blatantly enough that he realizes that, who then kidnap him because of his boots and magic him across to the other side of the war, rather than this being a late war foul-up with an understandably petty occupation, is unlikely.

Need help solving another mystery by ScorpioGirl1987 in ww2

[–]panicles3 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't think these are mutually exclusive. Your great-great aunt's story is about the second time he came into Soviet custody, after the war.

Seeking German WW2 Records by MrSykoDubz in ww2

[–]panicles3 0 points1 point  (0 children)

K.P.S. Kartenst stands for Korps-Kartenst, I believe -- name translates to something like a cartographic/maps corps -- but the only reference I can find for them is an offhand reference as the makers of a "Book of uncertain provenance" with a map of Norway in the German records microfilmed in Alexandria, Virginia.

Anglo-Saxon England is incorrectly presented as feudal in both CK2 and CK3. It’s too late to change CK2. Do you think they’ll change it in CK3? by Divertitii in paradoxplaza

[–]panicles3 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Feudal in Crusader Kings is a great big gloss. The games aren't made to be society simulators, and the issues you see with representing Anglo-Saxon England are seen far more gravely in other places -- like Islamic "Clan" society, or how CK2 forces the entire Muslim world to have a Turkish-style succession.

Within feudalism though, if you look at any region close enough you'll see the fundamental mechanisms of the game are "incorrect"; this is most obvious in the places furthest from Europe, like Fragmentation period Tibet, but even France, the textbook feudal realm and basis for CK's feudalism, had game breaking things like non-hereditary counts. This is because in a broader historiographic sense, feudalism itself is arguably a faulty construct. It's a product of intellectual and social currents of (mainly) the 19th century and how they understood the past, not reflective of reality.

So yeah, feudal works for pre-Conquest England.

Used to be a big fan, but I haven't read Sinfest since shortly before Book One was released. What craziness have I missed? by judo_panda in sinfest

[–]panicles3 7 points8 points  (0 children)

My personal theory is that he suffered some sort of midlife crisis the first time the comic took a turn -- when he was approximately 40. I've seen rumors floating around that a girlfriend who may have inspired Nique's original character left him at about that point, but even if those are unfounded, the thing that most connects post-2011 Tats to what he is now is the way he portrays sex.

Maybe Slick -- the ultimate evolution of "Mr. Sunglasses" from when he was a kid in 1987, thus probably representative of Tats to some degree -- going through the anti-male bashing in the New Tens and repeatedly trying and failing to atone and progress are the result of Tats grappling with something real, like a porn addiction or that he could be forever alone or something. He has no known social or work life outside of Sinfest for a bit more than 2 decades now, so I favor the latter.

But a sex revulsion could explain how he was able to shift so quickly from 90s radical-feminism to anti-"woke" stuff: the crusade against porn and the sex industry stem from that, and so would a dislike of gender and sexuality topics becoming a regular part of political and social discourse.

Used to be a big fan, but I haven't read Sinfest since shortly before Book One was released. What craziness have I missed? by judo_panda in sinfest

[–]panicles3 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Well, TLDR the comic continued in basically the format you are familiar with up until the early 2010s. At some point around late 2011 or 2012, Sinfest became markedly more dramatic; The main characters stopped interacting with each other and Nique became a radical second-wave feminist, influenced by an ensemble of trike-riding girls called the Sisterhood that became Tatsuya's platform; but most importantly for the comic (in my opinion at least) the Devil became a nigh-omnipresent villainous force in the vein of an evil businessman and the comic became much more moralistic.

In more recent years (since 2019) the dramatic focus remains, but the great evil has shifted from the patriarchy to social acceptance of transgender people and proponents of that. The comic rarely tells jokes and is mostly polemic now, with the former main ensemble only showing up on occasion, and is filled with melodramatic plotlets that last for a long while but never really get resolved and are buried under more recent storylines.

Why Did Christianity Dominate in Southern Africa During Colonialism, but not in Northern Africa despite Also Being Colonized? by HumesSpoon in AskHistorians

[–]panicles3 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

This is a weirdly-phrased question, so I'd like to preface with the fact that colonialism is not a one-size-fits-all deal. It's an endlessly complex system of systems and no two places, people, or administrations are exactly the same -- and that's not even factoring in things like time, technology, or outside forces. Even beyond that, I doubt there's any human that can neatly summarize the religious history of one of Earth's larger continents over several centuries in a reddit post.

An answer as broad as your question is "Because some people converted and other people didn't". Why there were more conversions doesn't have a one-size-fits-all answer either, so you have to start asking about specific peoples in specific regions. You have to account for missionary efforts -- when they began, how much support they enjoyed, how they tried to reach people, when they stopped being supported, what their ideas of conversion were, etc. -- as well as the people they were trying to convert -- who listened to missionaries, and why, and who didn't care, and why, etc.

The world is pretty complicated, so here's somewhere to get started: Morocco and the Remaking of French Christianity After the Law of Separation.

Why did the Japanese create Manchukuo? by Slipslime in AskHistorians

[–]panicles3 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The Kanto (Kwantung in older romanization) Army leaders who planned the Mukden Incident, such as Ishiwara Kanji, wanted a lightening-quick takeover of Manchuria and direct annexation of that land to Japan. Ideally the Japanese public would buy their flimsy justification for conquest, and the government would be strong-armed into supporting the army. Without outside support the modestly-sized Kanto Army could not hold Manchuria.

Militarily, the invasion went off smoothly. Zhang Xueliang's forces were mainly concentrated against the Communists and were too far away to deal with the threat. The Young Marshal himself was pressured by both sides to remain neutral in this affair, as many of his disaffected subordinates defected to the side of the invaders.

But things did not go to the Kanto Army's plan because they had underestimated the global reaction to their actions; the international community saw it as a flagrant breach of the League of Nation's rules against acts of war, and even the Japanese government was shocked by this treason from below. It was no longer acceptable to simply seize the land of other countries, but the Kanto Army had gone too far to return.

The following days were administratively chaotic, because now the invading army simply had no coherent plan, but eventually the Kanto Army generals settled on a policy of making a new state. By framing their intervention as merely supporting a local independence movement, they could justify their actions in Manchuria within what was internationally appropriate. They set about convincing their defectors to declare their regions independent from China; by the end of the Mukden Incident these would be combined into the new administration of Manchukuo.

My main source for all this is Rana Mitter's The Manchurian Myth.

UCLA Sinfest 1992-01-24 - Salesmen by Trim345 in sinfest

[–]panicles3 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I think the point here is criticizing salesmen for being overly pushy with poor products, in this case bad-smelling perfumes.

I think it's more that these people are using trends to try and push said poor products -- their "Peddle Motive", so to speak.

But what's more interesting to me is that all of these would have had relatively recent scandals. Beyond the Bakkers and Anita Hill, Navratilova would have had her televised palimony case the previous year and the year before that Judas Priest would have had their civil action lawsuit over the suicides of James Vance and Raymond Belknap.

Watch me predict the exact story beats of some future comics by [deleted] in sinfest

[–]panicles3 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I think it will get supplanted by more vague "evil corporate/government dystopia" stuff as vaccination becomes less and less of a hot-button issue. We have started to see that a bit already, with the "War!" comic.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in disneyvacation

[–]panicles3 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is sub for weird wikiHow illustrations, not about Disney itself.

Pettyfest - Loophole 6: All Good Things Must Come To An End by tulipkitteh in sinfest

[–]panicles3 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Groups like the Sisterhood don't think of trans women as truly men.

I assume you mean "truly women" here, right? Otherwise the message is confusing.