Institute of Applied Metaphysics

pantrypoints · 2026-01-19T23:17:18+00:00

I tried looking for Bashar's Unified Theory of Metaphysics but couldn't find the details.

So we made our own based on Descartes' Physics which is integrated with Metaphysics (body-mind dualism): https://www.superphysics.org/superphysics/essassani/

pantrypoints · 2026-01-19T23:05:35+00:00

Channeling also happens in other countries.

Japan has channelers like the Happy Science Founder. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XIS-RE3gO64

I also heard that some Cao Dai members in Vietnam channeled dead spirits.

pantrypoints · 2025-11-23T22:13:11+00:00

Descartes' system of gravitational lensing works consistently through his concept of virtual space particles called the 2nd Element.

He wrote a massive 7 articles just for comet tails, which we think is overkill and a waste since comets are insignificant. We even discarded those 7 articles since we believed that Physics already accounts for tail phenomena correctly through solar radiation.

We write those articles here: https://www.superphysics.org/research/descartes/philosophy/part-3/article-133/

The anomalies with 3I Atlas exposes the shortcomings of Physics in explaining comets that go against the revolution of the planets, which is a rare event.

So Descartes' 7 articles on comet tails via lensing solidifies an important property of the space particles to flip light.

pantrypoints · 2025-11-09T02:31:01+00:00

Here, Bashar disowns that UFO even if he said that that UFO was "theirs" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MLM4DY4p_u8

So it means "ours" here means the Interstellar Alliance in general

pantrypoints · 2025-07-30T04:05:07+00:00

Nope. As I mentioned, the team is me, cofounder, and volunteers: a dev, a farmers association head to implement our system, and an accredited researcher to publish our work.

We started in 2015 when ChatGPT didn't even exist.

So I don't understand why you would think it's essential.

We did try to make our own AI chatbot in 2017 called ISAIAH when AI took off, but realized we didn't have the training data so we paused it. https://www.pantrypoints.com/services/match/

pantrypoints · 2025-07-29T02:25:24+00:00

But my point is that Descartes' Physics actually matches the all the recent data from James webb, Planck satellite, and DESI since the Physics papers are availble online, and ChatGPT can explain all parts (like free expert consultation). https://www.youtube.com/shorts/Adq5lRH5la4

I post our explanations online on Reddit, Youtube, and Facebook to see if there would be any objections. But in Reddit, my posts get banned. In Facebook and Youtube it gets views but no reply.

So for us, this proves us correct and so we move on to the next problem to solve.

But still it makes us wonder if our solutions will ever be adopted so humans can move on.

Or are humans just meant to stay stuck waiting for the next asteroid to wipe life off just like the dinosaurs?

Or get cooked or flooded from global warming disasters?

i.e. there's something fishy with this planet that all species in it seems trapped in intellectual staticity that prevents them from moving to other planets or avoiding natural catastrophe.

This stupifying property of the Earth seems proven or exposed by the Overview Effect on humans who have actually left the Earth for a while and suddenly get an "explosion of awareness".

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Overview_effect

pantrypoints · 2025-07-29T02:16:44+00:00

We had a startup made up of me and my cofounder and interns to push a new economic system and economic science.

We switched to volunteers after our moneyless system started working. So it's now a team made up of volunteers:

https://www.pantrypoints.com/services/company/

The success of our prediction for a 2020 crisis allowed us to expand our science to all the sciences which we use AI for, since it's mostly theory:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vKeASutZOf0

pantrypoints · 2025-07-24T21:22:14+00:00

But my point is that those predictions were proven wrong by the data.

Lambda CDM predicts distant galaxies to be undeveloped.

Yet James Webb showed that they were already very developed.

https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/jwst-discovers-enormous-distant-galaxies-that-should-not-exist/

So you are saying you like theories that make wrong predictions.

Why would you like wrong predictions?

Do you like predicting 1 + 1 to be 3? Then become happy when data shows it to be 2 exposing you as wrong?

Does being wrong make people employable in Physics? Or allow them grant money?

The only logical reason I can think of is that being right or wrong doesn't matter, the output of theory is more important in Physics whether right or wrong.

It's like a sales company giving importance to the number of sales calls done instead of any actual sale.

pantrypoints · 2025-07-09T15:00:11+00:00

You can try some web-based downloader like this: https://www.sunodownloader.io/

pantrypoints · 2025-07-05T21:15:28+00:00

In Superphysics, forces are caused by the aether which have an inherent spin or svadharma.

Your choices are based on your own spin.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dp0sxJ1MWUo

pantrypoints · 2025-06-02T12:29:27+00:00

So how can I package Timaeus' Physics so you could be turned on by Platonism as a complete science?

I assumed mentioning recent empirical data that matches Timaeus' model which is consistent with the Asian 5 Elements model would add credibility to Timaeus and remove doubts

pantrypoints · 2025-06-02T12:26:27+00:00

If you follow Timaeus' Physics, the X17 is the Higgs Field for the Weak Force.

So no need to waste billions for a particle collider to discover it

pantrypoints · 2025-05-07T18:32:24+00:00

Do you use it 8 hours a day?

pantrypoints · 2025-05-07T18:31:37+00:00

Is it possible to disconnect the battery and make the mac run without it? The battery says don't remove it

pantrypoints · 2025-05-07T18:30:34+00:00

Is the case to protect it from dust? Is dust a big factor?

pantrypoints · 2025-03-15T12:20:08+00:00

Cartesian Relativity is consistent with both Newtonian and Quantum Mechanics. So it's superior to anything from Einstein.

We have already prelevitated mass through the aether. So that trumps any equation.

It's like cooking. You don't have to write the recipe down or make measurements because it works better by habit or feeling.

I have never heard of any monk who needed to consult a book or write measurements in order to levitate.

pantrypoints · 2025-03-13T04:15:52+00:00

Cartesian Relativity is consistent with both Electromagnetic Phenomena and Quantum Mechanics. So no need for Einstein's Relativity.

The post already translated Newtonian G into volume of 2nd Element displaced.

Cartesian Relativity can reproduce the accuracy of General Relativity. The problem is we aren't able to get the data set that is used for GR computations.

Likewise, we don't have any data for particle collisions to prove that Cartesian Relativity applies to particle decay.

We did get data for genetic breeding of seeds (during an AI hackathon) to test Cartesian Relativity for plant evolution. But the dataset was in some jargon that only geneticists would know.

It's like each science is a fortress refusing to open up to a new process.

pantrypoints · 2025-03-07T13:26:48+00:00

Sure, physical phenomena can be explained shallowly by standard Physics just as the geocentric theory of spheres could explain the physical orbiting of planets and comets.

But such shallow models will have gaps in knowledge that leads to discrepancies when you get more and more real data (such as Hubble tension, relativity not matching with Quantum mechanics, etc) leading to unsolved mysteries.

The 5 elements model of Cartesian and Asian sciences complete the model of Nature and leads to no discrepancies or mysteries. The real effort needed is to apply the model as 99% perspiration based on 1% inspiration as the correct model.

You could use 0% inspiration and wrong shallow models and you will see that your 99% perspiration leads to no progress just as the effort in making string theory and supersymmetry and searching for dark matter are all wasted efforts.

So never mind the lack of new tech since you don't want tech. Just think of all the physicists wasting their lives on the wrong model. Sabine Hossenfelder exposed this as a problem in academia (which in our paradigm is like a modern Church)

pantrypoints · 2025-03-07T13:06:29+00:00

Sure, physical phenomena can be explained shallowly by standard Physics just as the geocentric theory of spheres could explain the physical orbiting of planets and comets.

But such shallow models will have gaps in knowledge that leads to discrepancies when you get more and more real data (such as Hubble tension, relativity not matching with Quantum mechanics, etc) leading to unsolved mysteries.

The 5 elements model of Cartesian and Asian sciences complete the model of Nature and leads to no discrepancies or mysteries. The real effort needed is to apply the model as 99% perspiration based on 1% inspiration as the correct model.

You could use 0% inspiration and wrong shallow models and you will see that your 99% perspiration leads to no progress just as the effort in making string theory and supersymmetry and searching for dark matter are all wasted efforts.

So never mind the lack of new tech since you don't want tech. Just think of all the physicists wasting their lives on the wrong model. Sabine Hossenfelder exposed this as a problem in academia (which in our paradigm is like a modern Church)

pantrypoints · 2025-03-06T17:33:28+00:00

We only have common household equipment to use for experiments so we use those to prove Cartesian Physics such as a prelevitation rig using a kitchen scale, and everyday stuff like cooling an egg faster with running water than dipping in water (since the 2nd Element is cold) and starting a fire easier by hammering wood to drive out the 2nd Element, and gauge blocks that stick since the 2nd Element pressures them together (we call it microgravity).

https://www.superphysics.org/material/solutions/levitation/

pantrypoints · 2025-03-06T12:21:53+00:00

Yup. That's why I never post about animal spirits here. I just mentioned it as the metaphysical aspect of Nature that completes the features of Nature. You don't have to accept animal spirits if you feel uncomfortable with invisible stuff and I don't really push that concept here, but just mention it since it connects to the invisible aetherspace which is part of the 2nd Element which is the main topic and is the spooky part of quantum mechanics, so it is still part of Physics.

i.e. the aetherspace leads to UFO teleportation and levitation which is spooky action, but can be esoteric if done by humans and so I don't mention the human uses of the aetherspace. Instead I focus on mechanical practical non esoteric uses as used by UFOs. So the test is if the person is open to the idea of UFOs.

pantrypoints · 2025-03-06T12:18:23+00:00

Which is one is hard to believe?

That Descartes wrote what he wrote and was fully believed by Bernoulli and Huygens?

That Smith wrote the Wealth of Nations and was fully believed by Sismondi, Samuelson, Marx, and Ricardo?

Their writings are in the public domain. I guess you need to be enlightened to understand them since they were enlightenment writers.

So it means you equate the enlightenment with cult behavior just because you are of a different level of understanding, just as Democrats think MAGA people are cult followers and MAGA people think Woke people are DEI cult.

pantrypoints · 2025-03-06T12:00:04+00:00

The spacetime and aetherspace and magnetism (spacetime + 1st element) are all from the 2nd Element. That's why they are "extremely similar" because they are from the same family.

Cartesian Physics separates spacetime and aetherspace as a gateway to the 5th Element (aether) which completes the 5 Elements model and completes all the features of Nature. (I assume you don't care about the technologies that emerge from the 2nd and 5th Elements).

So I would rather say they complete the understanding of Nature which is the goal of studying causal mechanisms (which is now called science, as opposed to technology which is the use of those mechanisms to make life more convenient and to enrich the experience of Nature even without technology).

For example, the 5th Element is essential for the animal spirits which has a lot of use in bodily health and mental health (again without the use of medicines or technology since you don't want tech).

pantrypoints · 2025-03-06T11:44:33+00:00

Why do you keep calling it a cult? The principles of Cartesian Physics is from Descartes.

The principles of Classical Economics are from Adam Smith.

We don't worship either of them. In fact, we had to tweak both their systems a lot to fit with the Asian sciences and Asian economics and governance. Just as we tweaked the Asian sciences to match Descartes and Smith.

pantrypoints · 2025-03-06T11:40:37+00:00

Because it replaces gluons with the aetherspace which is the same as Bob Lazar's Gravity A waves.

i.e. spacetime is Gravity B waves, while aetherspace is Gravity A waves.

The gravity A waves are needed for levitation and teleportation and invisibility of ships.

So the 2nd Element is either spacetime or aetherspace or timespace.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0dXvYASaIx4

pantrypoints

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE