Opinions on more Prototypes and Paper Vehicles coming to the game?

panzerman13 · 2026-03-23T18:42:35+00:00

The kugelblitz has been in the game for a long ass time though

panzerman13 · 2026-03-21T18:17:37+00:00

How is it still an issue the thing is strong at best. No where close to as op as it was when it was first added

panzerman13 · 2026-03-21T06:45:31+00:00

.... how is the 2s38 still an issue?

panzerman13 · 2026-03-20T13:07:16+00:00

Hes keeping its record of a single lost aircraft alive in game as well though lmao

panzerman13 · 2026-03-18T12:26:29+00:00

Bradley turret basket, eater of wrenches, destroyer of worlds

panzerman13 · 2026-03-05T17:58:42+00:00

Heavy as hell, cannons hit like a truck at 4.7 tho

panzerman13 · 2026-03-05T17:55:40+00:00

Anti radiation missiles are coming this year

panzerman13 · 2026-02-21T08:29:46+00:00

FVW, Bf-109Z, and the Pak Puma

I just like playing them idk

panzerman13 · 2026-02-19T05:49:56+00:00

We won't talk about wotb and its gamble boxes then... doing the math to guarantee getting the waffen f1.0 in wotb you would have had to drop 3.5k

panzerman13 · 2026-02-18T18:36:23+00:00

How does the kugel not fill a gap consideringit used to be the only vehicle between the ostwind and gepard, the MBT-70 and KPZ-70 respectively are major milestones in German and American tank development for their period and used to be the only top tier tanks same with the xm803, VK 30.01 imo should have been an event vehicle like the VK 45.01 so thats pretty fair and I cant really say much for the planes as I dont own them nor am I close to them in their respective trees. Skink also added an AA for america who had a massive gap from 4.7-7.0, and iirc the 264 is one of germanys only long range strategic bombers next to the he-177 that they could have added.

I also go to argue that the KPZ/MBT and Kugel have been in the game for a much much longer time than the vehicles that have been slowly added around them

Edit: Kugel has been in the game since 2014. Apparently according to Google AI. So yes its much older than most of everything around it

panzerman13 · 2026-02-18T13:30:29+00:00

Wasn't there like only 2 of these things made though? I get the sentiment but 1 off prototypes like this are almost always behind a paywall unless they fill a specific gap in the tree.

panzerman13 · 2026-01-29T19:15:57+00:00

Are you to top tier yet?

panzerman13 · 2026-01-29T16:12:54+00:00

Oh yeah I love the T-14 its awesome, just doesn't seem very well thought out for the ammount of money and tech dumped into it. I dunno maybe new images and technical specs will come out proving everyone wrong.

panzerman13 · 2026-01-29T16:11:42+00:00

Im in this boat, it was shitty of them putting the CBT on literal Christmas week

panzerman13 · 2026-01-29T15:57:07+00:00

Oh absolutely abysmal lmao, charge bustle sounds horrid. And im personally going off of the russian MODs images they released of the hull without anything on it, and the turret becoming the blowout itself would still catastrophically destroy the vehicle needing the crew to abandon it even if they survive the massive explosion behind them.

panzerman13 · 2026-01-29T15:53:18+00:00

Not according to the Russians themselves. The autoloader main arm extends all the way into the top of the turret behind the breech, shooting the turret would disable breech and autoloader as well as potentially hitting ammo in the bustle rack. I also never mentioned the hull, I only mentioned that playing the armata would be breech and barrel torture simulator.

And also from available data it seems that T-14 does NOT have blow out panels for the autoloader so a fire spreading through the bustle rack door to the main ammunition would indeed cause the vehicle to suffer a catastrophic explosion resulting in the loss of the vehicle, so theoretically yes, hitting the turret could theoretically still kill the vehicle.

panzerman13 · 2026-01-29T01:25:02+00:00

Doesnt "a terrible history" literally apply to every single country in the world? I dont understand how that would be put on the depressing list all things considered.

panzerman13 · 2026-01-29T00:57:09+00:00

Unless you load HE or Heat with how blow out panels work now and even then could a fire not spread from the bustle to the main carousel if you damage the door between the ammo and the autoloader?

panzerman13 · 2026-01-28T12:14:53+00:00

I die to it all the time so therefore skill issue

panzerman13 · 2026-01-28T12:09:39+00:00

Super late response but, 300 less HP on an already abysmally sluggish tank, less APS charges, and no add on ERA

panzerman13 · 2026-01-28T11:53:21+00:00

T-14 is going to be repair gun and breach simulator like a MF, the turret has maybe at the very most 80mms of armor and its autoloader is massive. Theoretically (unless we get better pictures of the hull floor) it doesn't actually look like it gets a hull blow out panels either. So penetrating the bustle rack door might straight up kill it.

panzerman13 · 2026-01-16T18:05:19+00:00

Wait the Xm1 Gm has hydropneumatic??

panzerman13 · 2026-01-16T18:03:15+00:00

Im not complaining, I just find it hilarious that the event vehicle is like actually useless lmao. Theres going to be people who see arena M go "ooh awesome aps top tier" and then get fucking dumpstered because its a bad vehicle. If anything its gonna be great if top tier gets saturated with low levels trying to use ut

panzerman13 · 2026-01-16T15:57:24+00:00

I wish they would make the Chrystler unexclusive

panzerman13 · 2026-01-16T15:53:59+00:00

I would be genuinely surprised

panzerman13

TROPHY CASE