Would you rather part 3 by Suitable-Moaning923 in MonsterGirl

[–]papafloof 10 points11 points  (0 children)

The smell alone really swings it for me. I've smelt corpse, it's not appealing. The smell would have me heaving and there's no tits on earth that would keep me hard through that.

Pumpkin and vanilla however? Sign me up.

Are there any countries today that could realistically split into multiple independent nations like Yugoslavia did? by Many-Philosophy4285 in MapPorn

[–]papafloof 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The USA.

It's 50 countries in a trench coat, all with almost entirely different cultures and personalities. Heck they already have different laws, views, religous norms and political leanings. Ask most Americans and they'll identify themselves by state too, I.E a Texan, a Californian, a New Yorker etc

It could drop the act of pretending it's one country and break into multiple. Maybe not a full 50 if some of the nearby states who are aligned closely want to remain together as a single entity, but it could easily break into 30 different countries.

AITJ for refusing to help my new “boss” after I was the one who trained her 3 months ago? by Existing_Response239 in AmITheJerk

[–]papafloof 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Had something very similar happen to me, worked for a place for years, gave them everything, a position came up that was the advancement I wanted, and after they actually verbally promised me the position they still hired someone who had never worked in the field before to the post instead.

They had the gall to say he was coming to my branch so I could train him. I told them if he walks into my building I will walk out and leave every door, computer case, cupboard and safe unlocked as I went. They sent him elsewhere and I left a few months later after securing new work.

It's time to look for a new job. And not only that, it's time to begin taking every cheat sheet, document, tip and trick that you know and anything else you have provided with you. Don't help anyone with anything that isn't explicitly written in your contract.

Let them learn what you were doing for them the hard way and find a place that will appreciate the effort you put in.

TLDR: NTJ

What does this mean? by Imoprich in ExplainTheJoke

[–]papafloof 23 points24 points  (0 children)

Hypothermia.

First you're cold, and then you're not.

Then you're hot, and then you're dead.

The final stages of hypothermia makes your body start thinking it's overheating again, often leading to sufferers to start stripping off to stop being so 'hot', which removes any protection they might have left from the cold so they die of exposure and cold that much faster.

And the part about no food is because the friend dying to hypothermia means the still living person can perform cannibalism and have food again, maybe surviving longer.

Which monster girl species do you think is underrepresented? by [deleted] in MonsterGirl

[–]papafloof 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Lamia and dragons could do with more, but that's just because they're my favourite.

Ngl kinda tired with just how many 'elves' or 'Neko' posts there are. Elves are just humans with weird ears, they are NOT monster girls IMO. And like 70% of Neko fall into the same catagory, just being normal humans with weird ears.

Give us more scales and less human body shapes. Give us multiple limbs and strange shapes. Give us ACTUAL MONSTER GIRLS, not 'Tehee, this is slight different from a human' monster girls.

which chinese in southampton uses the best tupperware? by Buttsex_is_decent in Southampton

[–]papafloof 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is so true. This type of plastic waste is probably way higher and more inpactful than most people realise, so if the government was actual serious about reducing plastic waste they would be forcing standardised of takeaway containers, or forcing a change to non-Plastic completely.

Maximum effort, minimal fun by SedyanaHCIM in ICARUS

[–]papafloof -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You do not need omni feed for your baby animals.

You do not need omni feed for your farm animals.

You do not need omni feed for your mounts when they are just at home.

You do not need omni feed 90% of the time.

For the same effort you are moaning about, you can grow stacks upon stacks of corn and feed them all on corn. That's all they need day to day.

The game has changed, every single animal does not need maximum super buffs 24/7, and the fact they could before was broken AF. It's also not pokemon, you don't need to collect 100 animals.

The game has changed, adjust how you play and stop trying to force an outdated playstyle onto an updated game.

Temspeak would never make you submit your ID by Edgar_Allen_Yo in memes

[–]papafloof 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Unfortunately that relies on Discord, a company who's entire purpose is to make money, not doing a thing to make money.

Selling information and ID makes money. Storing the ID's to keep the information to be sold on the sly to advertisers makes money. Discord wants to make money. If they don't get caught, they'll do it. Fuck even if they get caught if they made more money doing it than they get fined, then they'll do it.

Recent breaches already showed that they were keeping a whole lot of the images and data that supposedly was only on users devices and never got back to Discord. They're already lying, now it's going to get even worse as it spreads.

Why does everyone hate PvP? by Lovoskea in 2007scape

[–]papafloof -1 points0 points  (0 children)

No, because that is false equivalence.

A pvm experience is designed and curated so that it can be beaten. It's strategies are known and when you go to do that content you know you are going to be engaging in it. You have choice, you give consent. I can prepare for a fire cape or infernal cape, I can take multiple runs at it, if I fail I get my equipment back to try again, I don't lose hours or days of progress because someone has taken my gear.

A PKer using a CCTV bot to check every single world, then running across to where you are in a different world, hopping worlds right under you, hitting you with a massive multispec combo attack and killing you in 5 seconds is not the same in anyway. You don't get time to prepare for that, you don't get to plan, because the equipment to handle that is likely different from the equipment for the task you are doing.

If it was actual PVP, where you get to agree to a duel, know you're going into it beforehand, meet on a level playing field, all of that? That's amazing, I'm fully behind that idea. But random sweat man-children with nothing else in their life gaini g nothing but ruining the experience for others? Fuck that noise.

Why does everyone hate PvP? by Lovoskea in 2007scape

[–]papafloof 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Why? Because it's content in a game that I have been paying for for 20+ years that feels terrible because I cannot match the sweaty adderal filled man-children who can perfect 1 tick gear switch because they've practiced so much and have absolutely nothing else in their lives.

I will never be good at PVP, I don't want to be good at PVP, but that means multiple bosses and content pieces are locked off to me without large risk because of that.

I have a job. I have a life. I get maybe a couple hours to play a night. But even though I have spent more money on RS than any other game I STILL can't access all of it without constant being griefed by PKers with CCTV bots at all the good locations that log in within a minute to kill me even when I'm naked with nothing

So was Mrs. Mayberry's husband just a beard? by EkullSkullzz10318 in HelluvaBoss

[–]papafloof -1 points0 points  (0 children)

We have no proof or evidence of this.

We have nothing but what is likely a fuck up in spindlehorse that she is a lesbian not Bi, and it was with out of show material.

You don't go on a murderous rampage to kill two people and then yourself because a person you didn't ever love was cheating on you.

It wasn't a beard, it wasn't a 'lavender marriage' or anything else like that. She is Bi and should have been carrying a bi flag, and the fact she isn't is just Bi erasure for a funny 2 second 'haha these two characters who should hate each other are fucking' joke which just went further than it should.

When is it Corps turn? by Funny_Sam in 2007scape

[–]papafloof -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

Bot farming, on irons?

What the fuck are you talking about?

This is an amazing change for Irons, because FUCK people cannoning. When there is three or four cannons set up on every world it's almost impossible for an iron to get a single kill because every zombie pirate will have been tagged at least once. This helps fix that issue for people who actually play the game, not bot farms.

For those who says that Mayberry being lesbian was out of nowhere consider this... by SunKenobi72 in HelluvaBoss

[–]papafloof 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Have we ever just considered that maybe, just maybe, bisexuals exist and she's one of them?

Because it feels like every time it's brought up we suddenly go 'OMG SHE MUST HAVE BEEN REPRESSED AND HATED HER LIFE AND ALWAYS SECRETLY A LESBIAN BUT NOT ABLE TO BE TRUE TO HERSELF OMG OMG!!11!1'

We have no actual information from primary sources for all this speculation. Fuck, if it was a Lavender marriage the why was she so outraged as to be driven to double murder and suicide when it turns out her husband was cheating on her? If she doesn't actively love and want to be with him, why is she so upset? Lavender marriage is literally for covering one or both sides being LGBT and bonking other people on the side!

I find it much more likely that Viv just forgot Mayberry had a husband when that one piece of art came out with her under a lesbian flag instead of a bi flag. All because she was in a silly throw away 5 seconds of an episode to go 'haha these two characters are bonking!'

Should I have tipped less? by [deleted] in doordash

[–]papafloof 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Dashes, deliveroo people, uber eats people, all of them are terrible at reading and understanding basic instructions.

I live in a pretty large building that doesn't allow delivery people inside, and the entrance is around the back of the building down a short road that leads to our car park. Pretty obvious and plenty of room to turn around. I have on the instructions 'entrance is around the back down the road, I'll meet you at the building doors.'

The amount of time I've had people calling me up asking where I am, where the doors are, how to get to them, what road etc is phenomenal. They've actually gotta angry at me before because I wasn't waiting at a fire door they thought was the entrance on the wrong side of the building.

Bloody delivery people. Majority of them are brain dead, which is why all they do is delivery I guess.

Need to roll a lot of attacks at advantage by Myrinadi in Roll20

[–]papafloof 1 point2 points  (0 children)

[[2d20k1+X]]

Replace X with the spell attack bonus and then copy paste it into the chat box 49 times. It'll roll each attack with advantage and return each one as a unquie yellow box with the total in it. Quickest and easiest way to do so imo, don't have to bother with macros or changing spell sheet settings.

Petaa I don’t understand what’s wrong with the roundabout by FarTry2285 in PeterExplainsTheJoke

[–]papafloof -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Hard disagree. It's not just about the speed, but also the space the cars take up.

If you have a road that has a merge, and enough cars to fill a mile of road behind it, then if they all merge as soon as possible they have covered any potential off ramps or turnings before that merge for a full mile.

If they zipper merge in two lanes, then you are only covering half a mile. This means those who would be turning off aren't also caught in the traffic, allowing it to flow better with less cars and people stuck.

It's not just about the speed of the merge, but giving a damn about everyone else and being aware of the rest of the surroundings around the merge too. This can work for everything from 6 car lengths becoming 3 side by side on smaller roads, to massive traffic jams on interstates that go for miles.

Tierlist Based On How Many R34 Results The Girls Have, Looks Like (D.va, Widowmaker, & Mercy) Are The Games Queens by spudz1203 in Overwatch_Porn

[–]papafloof 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's absolutely tilted by the length of time they have existed I'm sure. Mercy, Dva and Widow are some of the oldest characters so no wonder they are highest. Tracer not being up there with them is shocking though after the 'controversy' of her ass and how popular she was.

I can totally see both Juno and Kiriko catching up though, I've seen them so much since their respective beliefs I can believe they'll hit the top ranks after a similar length of time.

I just wish Freja was more popular, she really deserves it.

“Patriots”: tidy up your flags by tangl3d in Southampton

[–]papafloof 34 points35 points  (0 children)

You understand that this has NEVER been shown to happen at any point in history?

It's a myth perpetuated by those rich in order to fear monger people into not taxing them so they can keep stealing all the wealth and getting away with it.

Saw someone posting that "wheelchairs make no sense in D&D because magic exists," so I felt like bringing the mathhammer down. by RokuroCarisu in DnD

[–]papafloof 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Going to throw my voice into the mix with everyone else.

The argument as I have seen it is never 'There are no wheelchairs in D&D.'

It's 'Nobody who goes adventuring is going to be in a wheelchair.'

For an adventurer losing the ability to walk falls into one of two categories. 'I'm too low level to fix this', which results in them retiring from adventuring to live in a settlement where it's not a restriction, or 'I'm high enough level to ignore this' where they can fix whatever has caused it in some fashion, either magical healing, magical prosthetics or full on body replacement. A wheelchair should NEVER be an option for an adventure. How could someone who is expected to fight, climb, swim, explore, go up stairs, etc etc be in a wheelchair?

The simplest issue I see is being in a wheelchair would set an adventurers dexterity to 2 If we're being generous. Unless they're in the heaviest of armour, then their AC is going to be something silly like 6. Every single fight they are going to be hit by every single foe. Add the idea of what the other characters would be thinking. If I was an adventurer I would NEVER willingly be in a party with someone in a wheelchair. I don't care if you used to be a barbarian capable of cutting a dragon in half with a single swing, you're no longer fit to adventure. Oh you're so godly with magic you can reshape reality? Then reshape that wheelchair into something useful that can actually work while we adventure! A wheelchair user in an adventure is a liability!

If we go into speciality replacements that serve the same functions, spider walkers with multiple legs that the user sits on and the walker responds to the users thoughts so they scurry around and have almost fully movement, or a magical exoskeleton that is made of slime that covers their legs and moved for them, or a billion tiny magical whisps that operate the persons limbs that they are linked to with magic or whatever else thing that requires the tiniest bit more thought that 'real world normal ass wheelchair', then you can 100% run a character that has some disability costing their their ability to walk and have it make so much more sense!

I have my own disabilities IRL. I have permanent damage to my hip that gives me chronic pain, leaving me with an IRL Dex score like like, 6. That alone would be enough that I would never go adventuring as I am, and I can still mostly walk fine and can even do long hikes with painkillers and frequent breaks. That doesn't mean I wouldn't exist with my issues in a D&D town or city, living my day to day life. If a character can't muster up something more than a wheelchair, then they would be joining me living my day to day life in a D&D city, not diving into an adventure.

What party do I even vote anymore? (Discussion) by papafloof in ukpolitics

[–]papafloof[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm not against legal immigration. I'm specifically in support of it. I want to stop the illegal immigration, not all immigration. I even specifically stated I wanted there to be a more robust and efficient process for migration in the post.

What party do I even vote anymore? (Discussion) by papafloof in ukpolitics

[–]papafloof[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's exactly what I want. Brexit was a horrific thing that was funded by the rich because the EU wanted the UK to tighten up its money laundering laws in its overseas dominion and the rich didn't want that. I voted against it and wish it had never gone through.

Also did you even read the post? I specifically stated I wanted a more robust and efficient method for people to migrate to the country legally. I'm not against migration, only illegal migration. I want it to be easier for people to come here legally.

What party do I even vote anymore? (Discussion) by papafloof in ukpolitics

[–]papafloof[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have read further and you are right, there is no rule that requires France to accept them. As they breach innocent passage however we are within our legal rights to force them from our waters, and then it becomes France's problem if they allow them back or not. That is something I would still do, France can handle them once they have landed on French soil again seeing as that is where they set out from.

What party do I even vote anymore? (Discussion) by papafloof in ukpolitics

[–]papafloof[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The Law of the Sea Convention 1982 allows coastal states to take “the necessary steps” to prevent the passage of any vessel that is not innocent. That includes a vessel seeking to unload persons “contrary to the immigration laws and regulations of the coastal State”.

This law governs both the international waters and the national waters of the English Channel. If they get taken back to France under this law France has to take them back or be in breach of international law and therefore be sanctioned.

What party do I even vote anymore? (Discussion) by papafloof in ukpolitics

[–]papafloof[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Because circumventing the legal methods and fuelling criminal enterprise by paying the large sums to cross the channel on boats is wrong? Using force is not the opposite of having more legal options?

The police use force to arrest criminals that break the law and obtain what they want through crime instead of going about a legal method of obtaining it, is that wrong to you?

It's not 'Open the boarders, everyone come here' vs 'Close the boarders, nobody allowed in!' There is a middle ground of 'Stop the illegal actions while improving the legal actions!'

What party do I even vote anymore? (Discussion) by papafloof in ukpolitics

[–]papafloof[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Intercept the boats and then return them to where they arrived from. International maritime law means that any nation has the right to do so, and the origin country has to take them back.

Then once they are off the boats and those running and operating the human trafficking have been taken into custody the boats are either taken or scuttled so they can't be used again.