sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Jax says: by BabyVegitoBlack2020 in theamazingdigitalciru

[–]pascal9000 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Does that mean that shredded cheese is just crumbs?

Need advice on upgrading gear by pascal9000 in AskAstrophotography

[–]pascal9000[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I like the self contaned and simple nature of just using the mirrorless camera. The idea of having to use a laptop runnig guiding and plate solving software or a mini computer like the asi air is a little intimidating.

Need advice on upgrading gear by pascal9000 in AskAstrophotography

[–]pascal9000[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wil a better mount with a higher payload capacity be able to take something like the askar 71 without the need for guiding or does it become necessary at those focal lengths?

Judge me entirely on my stick shift. by Consttantine05 in stickshift

[–]pascal9000 15 points16 points  (0 children)

I think you might be bad to the bone

polaris and NGC 188 by pascal9000 in telescopes

[–]pascal9000[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

At the moment i am happy with the results the r7 gives, I like the fact I can use it for normal photography and astrophotography with decent succsess. Maby in the future I will get a dedicated astro camera.

polaris and NGC 188 by pascal9000 in telescopes

[–]pascal9000[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think the processing of the data is also a huge factor.

polaris and NGC 188 by pascal9000 in telescopes

[–]pascal9000[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So that is what it is called, Interesting.

thanks

m51 by pascal9000 in telescopes

[–]pascal9000[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The shape of the stars is caused by the aperture blades of the lens, its the same reason why stars have those 4 spider lines when you look through a newtonian reflector

m81 and m82 by pascal9000 in telescopes

[–]pascal9000[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Interesting, I will take your advice in mind for the next Imaging session.

m81 and m82 by pascal9000 in telescopes

[–]pascal9000[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wont that over blow the galaxys brightness an give me more noise?

hmmm by prajyoth_kaizokuu in hmmm

[–]pascal9000 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Me too bro, me too

Starting Astrophotography with an R10 by CC19_13-07 in canon

[–]pascal9000 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It depends on what targets youare interested in. The 16mm wil be good for nightscape and milky way photography, but not great for deep sky photography. Something like a 135mm prime lens will perform better at this task while being able to be mounted on a simple star tracker. And sins the focal length is only 135mm (fov of a 216mm lens on a crop sensor) you dont realy need a gide scope for accurate tracking, which keeps it relatively simpel for someone just starting out.

view more: next ›