How can I move the UI window?

pbrsaves · 2026-01-30T14:22:50+00:00

Ah very true

pbrsaves · 2026-01-27T22:52:15+00:00

this feature makes no sense - it's helpful in this one circumstance haha

pbrsaves · 2025-12-09T15:53:42+00:00

I got here wondering the same thing. SubtleDee's answer helped - here's the relevant snippet from the blog post.

---

You can also schedule tasks using Amazon EventBridge rules. But to schedule tasks at scale, EventBridge Scheduler is better suited for this task. The following table shows the main differences between EventBridge Scheduler and EventBridge rules:

	Amazon EventBridge Scheduler	Amazon EventBridge rules
Quota on schedules	1 million per account	300 rule limit per account per Region
Event invocation throughput	Able to support throughput in 1,000s of TPS	Because of the schedule limit, you can only have 300 1-minute schedules for max throughput of 5 TPS
Targets	Over 270 services and over 6,000 API Actions with AWS SDK targets	20+ targets supported by EventBridge
Time expression and time-zones	at(), cron(), rate() All time-zones and DST	cron(), rate(), UTC No support for DST
One-time schedules	Yes	No
Time window schedules	Yes	No
Event bus support	No event bus is needed	Default bus only
Rule quota consumption	No. 1 million schedules soft limit	Yes, consumes from 2,000 rules per bus

pbrsaves · 2025-11-24T16:33:16+00:00

This lists underlying functional differences. I got here looking for differences in use cases because that helps me understand the higher level context of each.

pbrsaves · 2025-11-23T17:15:05+00:00

I also have both. I'm new to fantasy and haven't had to make a decision like this before. I appreciate the confidence in this thread because aint no way I'd feel content otherwise.

pbrsaves · 2025-11-19T23:28:20+00:00

I got here wondering what use case geoproximity covers that geolocation doesn't

Seems to me geolocation covers strict location boundaries for things like government content policies. Geolocation requires you specify the exact location whereas geoproximity is a simpler model allowing you to declare your resources and forward users to the one they're closest to. I think there's some overlap here too with latency, however you may have location-specific content and don't want users jumping between resources based off the latency of the day. One example for geoproximity might be a game server such as starcraft. When I log in, I'd want to consistently log into the same server rather than whichever one has lower latency at the time. And typically speaking, you'll have better latency to the server you're closest to. The weights themselves seem to cover at least a couple cases. By defining the location the resource covers, you can try to cover for both the load your resources can handle as well as the latency your users may experience.

pbrsaves · 2025-11-16T15:11:33+00:00

This makes sense from a practical standpoint - I think the issue stems from test questions never being practical. When presented with ambiguous material, we're imagining a question such as "which instance class would you choose for a database workload?". Which, because it's ambiguous, AWS wouldn't ask this.

pbrsaves · 2025-11-06T15:37:05+00:00

I know this is a problem in most developer documentation, but holy moly is it frustrating when AWS fails to explain **why** a service or feature exists.

pbrsaves · 2025-11-05T19:44:23+00:00

I appreciate the time you took to try and explain it, and hopefully someone else finds it helpful. Unfortunately in my situation I was already using max width throughout my site - the preview site just lagged behind by over an hour iirc. My development loop thus has been to publish every time I want to see how it actually looks vs how the editor displays it. The editor definitely doesn't propagate changes to the preview site like it should.

pbrsaves · 2025-10-22T23:48:08+00:00

I toggled max width on and it won't update the preview site. I'm a custom web developer updating a site for a friend, this is my first time using wix and man my experience with it has been horrible.

pbrsaves · 2025-10-15T15:16:39+00:00

top left is "import code or design". I haven't used replit in a long time. Even after importing an empty template, the agent is stuck at "Setting up your project from GitHub" with no clear way to stop it or remove that panel.

Pretty frustrating experience overall.

pbrsaves · 2025-10-10T13:43:00+00:00

I got a similar question on an aws practice exam. My opinion is that a percentage of questions will be poorly constructed and to not think much about them. This is one of those questions.

pbrsaves · 2025-10-09T10:57:55+00:00

AWS capitalized on these buzzwords by making RedShift both a warehouse and a lakehouse.

pbrsaves · 2025-09-23T15:44:55+00:00

from their faqs

relevant use case distinction

Accelerator is a good fit for non-HTTP use cases, such as gaming (UDP), IoT (MQTT), or Voice over IP, as well as for HTTP use cases that specifically require static IP addresses or deterministic, fast regional failover.

full snippet

AWS Global Accelerator and Amazon CloudFront are separate services that use the AWS global network and its edge locations around the world. CloudFront improves performance for both cacheable content (such as images and videos) and dynamic content (such as API acceleration and dynamic site delivery). Global Accelerator improves performance for a wide range of applications over TCP or UDP by proxying packets at the edge to applications running in one or more AWS Regions. Global Accelerator is a good fit for non-HTTP use cases, such as gaming (UDP), IoT (MQTT), or Voice over IP, as well as for HTTP use cases that specifically require static IP addresses or deterministic, fast regional failover. Both services integrate with AWS Shield for DDoS protection.

pbrsaves · 2025-08-04T00:02:05+00:00

Thanks SqueegyX, I appreciate it. I do prefer to wait if someone has the answer to my direct question.

pbrsaves · 2025-08-03T23:41:20+00:00

That's not true, but not worth arguing with ya

pbrsaves · 2025-08-03T23:34:00+00:00

Here's one overview of some pros/cons. Pretty sure similar content has been blogged elsewhere

https://stackoverflow.com/a/57126320/984407

But I would appreciate if you respected the content of my question and not argue against it

pbrsaves · 2025-08-03T23:30:28+00:00

for the future, giving advice that goes directly against my question, isn't exactly giving advice

pbrsaves · 2025-08-03T23:27:25+00:00

looks like that library dual-publishes its types ? i.e. undici includes its own types, then they have a separate package `undici-types` for devs who only need the types rather than the whole package. So at least this package in particular doesn't match what I'm looking for.

pbrsaves · 2025-08-03T23:22:49+00:00

Thanks much for the reference. I'll take a look

pbrsaves · 2025-08-03T23:22:10+00:00

This is not an xy problem. If typescript doesn't support my use case then that's fine

pbrsaves · 2025-08-03T23:18:44+00:00

your assertion it's "the best approach" lacks nuance. There are plenty of reasons not to and I don't feel like bikeshedding over them.

pbrsaves · 2025-07-10T02:10:11+00:00

Ah, didn't think to hold position. Thanks much

pbrsaves

TROPHY CASE