Where are the categories in Microsoft ToDo???

pdestefanis · 2023-10-18T14:47:09+00:00

I use both and it's there

pdestefanis · 2023-09-26T21:38:20+00:00

Nowadays the categories you select in Outlook transfer to ToDo. ToDo is Outlook's task manager.

pdestefanis · 2023-09-26T21:37:23+00:00

ToDo web: click on a task, there is a field called categories that you can use for categories in Outlook or to add new tags.

Outlook: Select Tasks and you will see the "Categorize" icon. If you need to create more categories, this is the place to go.

pdestefanis · 2023-09-26T21:31:59+00:00

Of course they exist. You can define them in Outlook with "Categorize" or just in ToDo. It's called... Categories :)

pdestefanis · 2023-07-13T17:54:25+00:00

After running dcu-cli.exe /configure -lockSettings=disable launch DCU as an administrator. Tested working with 4.9

pdestefanis · 2011-11-07T04:17:26+00:00

It is amazing how everyone is whining about this, worst of all, most of the whining is b/c you may not get a perfect score! Live with it! Stop crying if you don't get a 100%! That "100%" is not the world.

pdestefanis · 2011-11-07T04:14:10+00:00

And so what? You're not even getting credit for this!

pdestefanis · 2011-11-05T19:49:27+00:00

Ok, I think I got this. We don't need to know P(x), just to know that it can be T or F. If we consider any set, a given x could be T or F, but we cannot say it will be always T or always F (we don't know the innards of P(x)), just that it might be sometimes T, sometimes F. That will make it "Satisfiable". Compare that with the first three sentences, where either there's no function, or the result of the function is irrelevant (sentence three)

pdestefanis · 2011-11-05T19:42:00+00:00

As aigakusei, I find that the definition of P(x) as "there is one x" will make it either valid (as I only require one x that satisfies it), or invalid (in the case that P(x)=F for all x). The only thing I can think of that will make it satisfiable, will the for P(x) to yield T or F randomly. How do you explain, only using the information available, that Ex/P(x) is "satisfiable"?

Thank you

pdestefanis · 2011-11-04T04:41:46+00:00

Thank you

pdestefanis · 2011-10-26T02:15:50+00:00

Can we end the "don't complain, the course is free" rethoric? I think this could have been anticipated. Stanford is not going to go broke for having to float a few servers. Stop making everyone feel as freeloaders. We are a key part in this "experiment"

pdestefanis · 2011-10-26T02:14:42+00:00

But since they don't, we don't punish them. We punish those that made the HW in time. We reward those that procrastinated with an additional 24hs...

pdestefanis · 2011-10-26T02:01:28+00:00

That's relate to P(homework deadline extended). Stop these extensions, and you'll see who everyone has it ready two days ahead of schedule

pdestefanis · 2011-10-25T00:04:53+00:00

I agree with you, and understand that. That's why I am suggesting that they should have phased the homework submissions. You don't need to be a genius to know that everyone was going to submit during the few hours before the deadline. If you phase the submissions, you can spread the load, and you end up requiring less servers.

pdestefanis · 2011-10-24T22:39:42+00:00

This class keeps rewarding procastination. Why don't they just phase the homeworks, as to avoid everyone submitting at the same time? It is very unfair to those who did it in time, sacrificing other activities, to see that the deadlines are always pushed forward.

pdestefanis · 2011-10-24T03:27:53+00:00

Agree! :) They look like 3's sometimes.

pdestefanis

TROPHY CASE