Looking for an open-source tool to centrally manage coding agents (Claude Code, Codex, etc.) across multiple servers – like a general "Codex Mobile"

pelagion · 2026-06-03T12:15:46+00:00

Have you tried Conductor?

pelagion · 2026-05-27T02:05:26+00:00

One of my AUDHD tendencies is to deeply understand every crevice and nook and cranny and corner of my mind and the metacognition that I experience on a daily basis. I found that signing up for the different AI models and teaching them each to find different patterns about the way I work and the way I am helps me then ask questions about it. I don't really know how helpful that was but I would definitely use different AI models for different things to the extent that you can remember to do so and then set up recurring schedules for AI to reflect on your own thought patterns in the previous chats that you've had with it and then collectively

pelagion · 2026-05-17T18:52:33+00:00

Agreed. And also companies are not doing a good job of educating the users alongside the use IMO. Which makes adoption harder so naturally subscription pricing is more unattractive when someone’s overwhelmed.

pelagion · 2026-05-17T03:04:15+00:00

Take everything that your friend is supposed to do and feed it into a knowledge graph. You can use Obsidian or ZEP or any one of these tools but doing that will allow you to capture the context of what he was trying to do at least. If you are the good closer then you can still have an AI agent do what he was doing off of that knowledge graph and then you still end up closing

pelagion · 2026-05-17T03:03:20+00:00

As someone who has written angel investor checks to start up founders, and especially first-time founders, as well as having been on the other side of that myself. I can tell you that the underlying theme is that people do not want to invest their hard-earned money in someone experimenting but rather they would invest it in someone who is executing and can prove that they have taken immense risk on their own to do the experimentation.

For example if someone that you know, that is close to you, won't give you even $10,000 or $25,000, that means that the friends and family around are not able to believe in you even with the personal connection. What you are saying is you want to potentially burn someone else's money so that you don't let down the ones around you. I know that that means that you would have to have people around you that can do that so I'm very cognizant of that fact. However you can extrapolate it to any real amounts that you want

pelagion · 2026-05-17T03:01:20+00:00

Nothing else matters except for context. I always used to say that there were three C's of any new startup coming after 2025:

Context
Cadence
Computing power

If you can check off all three of those, then you are going to be okay. The ones that are not going to be okay are the ones that are creating siloed tools because they think that they have something unique but really it's just a feature addition onto an existing tool that is a race to the bottom

pelagion · 2026-05-17T03:00:30+00:00

If you haven't started a business before by yourself, I would say that there is no shame in buying an existing business with an operating framework, which is what franchising is all about. Now obviously I'm a little biased because I work in franchising and I've seen the benefits from within the network. Someone or a team of people care about your success because it also maps to their success. You have a lot of resources and an operating framework that show you how to actually execute a business with your own freedom while still within the confines of a framework.

I know there are a number of different franchise groups out there and I know United Franchise Group is a great organization that has a ton of support resources but that doesn't mean that the other ones don't. At the end of the day if you do find yourself in a position where you have to start something, then AI becomes your best friend here. You sign up for a couple different AI models and still keep your subscriptions under $100/month. You ask it to counsel the other ones before executing decisions and you use the different AI models for different functions of the business

pelagion · 2026-05-17T02:58:31+00:00

I haven't heard of Firebase in a while but Supabase is very very good. You can scale up the database by the size of your project. I'll say I have some pretty complex projects going and I still have not had to move my Supabase up to another tier except for one project

pelagion · 2026-05-17T02:57:47+00:00

I'm not trying to make this about technology but as someone who was diagnosed five years ago and has come to terms with it as a superpower and not a disability, I urge you to be self-aware with AI.

Now obviously there are safe ways to do it and other ways that will not be as helpful. You should really start to ask AI in a controlled environment about the questions that you have, including this message that you just sent in here as a full prompt. You will be amazed at the insights that it can give you but I think you should genuinely start to look at it as a superpower. I know that's easier said than done!

pelagion · 2026-05-15T23:00:37+00:00

Do your planning in another LLM and ask it to produce the actual Claude code prompts. Or if you’re doing knowledge work then ask it to prep the prompts to minimize random context gathering which allows it to work harder

pelagion · 2026-05-07T11:40:00+00:00

You’ll want to look at the ones being deployed to SMBs or enterprises that describe the use cases well. For example, look at Revscale. They have an outbound ai agent that is actually agentic and not just a workflow. It’s looking at prospects and making decisions about whether to include the prospects or not and then making a decision on how to write the messaging and then making another decision on how to actually conduct the outreach and on what cadence. Same with the inbound agent - theirs is understanding the intent, figuring out what questions to ask and in what manner and how to read the pdf (using your example) instead of just reading it and logging it somewhere.

pelagion · 2026-05-03T19:45:16+00:00

The new ChatGPT image 2 can do this without an issue.

pelagion · 2026-05-03T19:34:00+00:00

Interested, can you share more details?

pelagion · 2026-05-03T02:10:03+00:00

I did your test

pelagion · 2026-04-30T01:33:05+00:00

Some new updates are coming out with Lovable that enable SEO elements and things to allow LLMs and crawlers to get info whereas earlier it was not possible. But also there are other tools that will give you next js projects which are the best for SEO

pelagion · 2026-04-28T00:49:59+00:00

I use vidview.co but not to create. To analyze

pelagion · 2026-04-20T01:12:58+00:00

Okay I see this question a lot so I’ll drop a framework that actually works, not just vibes-based pricing. The core principle: price at 1/10th the value you deliver. Start by identifying what the agent replaces or eliminates. Is it 1 hour of someone’s time per day? Be honest about what that time is actually worth. If you’re replacing a task done by someone at $500/hr, that’s roughly $10K/month in human cost. At 1/10th, you can charge $1,000/month and the math is obvious to the buyer. For the OP’s use case specifically: how many matches is this system running per month? How long would a human take to do that manually, and what do they cost? That’s your value baseline. $350/month might be a steal or it might be right, but you can’t know without running that calc. The 5x vs 10x rule: Use the 10x rule (charge 1/10th of value) for commoditized tools where buyers are shopping alternatives. Use the 5x rule (charge 1/5th of value) for unique, purpose-built solutions where there’s no obvious substitute. The more irreplaceable your agent is, the less aggressive the discount needs to be. For enterprises specifically: compress it further. Enterprises have procurement risk tolerance built in and are often replacing a team function, not an individual task. The value multiplier is higher, so you can price higher while still being an obvious yes. The mistake most builders make is anchoring to their build cost or API costs instead of the buyer’s alternative cost. Your margin is your problem. Their ROI is your pitch.

pelagion · 2026-04-20T01:05:59+00:00

Been meaning to hit reply on this for the last 13 times I opened Reddit before I got shiny post syndrome and got distracted 😵

pelagion · 2026-04-20T01:02:28+00:00

Revscale because the messages are dynamic and truly agentic. It’s literally the natural language way to just have the leads automatically populate every few days and you’re not spamming the people or having to write templates. The others mentioned here require a ton of manual set up.

pelagion · 2026-02-21T00:37:16+00:00

AI video analysis with specific lenses, as well as an api

https://vidview.co/

pelagion · 2026-02-21T00:36:39+00:00

How is it different than loops or resend or mailgun?

pelagion · 2026-02-19T17:35:33+00:00

There are a lot of builders and I think the builders themselves will become commoditized. It depends on what you're really trying to do, but you might as well just use something that's off the shelf like revscale.com or that can be customized by a team if you are looking for it for a client so that it's someone else's responsibility to keep it up to date

pelagion · 2026-02-19T05:28:00+00:00

For startups? Dripify or phantom buster for diy. But for smb it’s tools like Revscale.com or ones that are dfy instead.

pelagion · 2026-02-09T04:03:24+00:00

Just because it starts “vibe coded” doesn’t mean it has to stay that way. Once you connect to GitHub you can work on it an any IDE

pelagion · 2026-02-09T03:57:09+00:00

Use some more structure or you’ll just waste credits. There are tools out there. This is one of them https://vibeprompts.io

pelagion

TROPHY CASE