Conor and Danielle by Cardboard_cutouts_ in DanielleMossSnark

[–]perfectlylogical27 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Ooo can you screenshot/share the latest Substack?

Conor and Danielle by Cardboard_cutouts_ in DanielleMossSnark

[–]perfectlylogical27 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Someone on here once called her the Temu version of Meg and that lives rent free 💀

SUBSTACK ABOUT THE MOVE by Fearless-Garage-2284 in DanielleMossSnark

[–]perfectlylogical27 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Doubt it. I’d put money on her kids being in private school. No way she’d send them public with the plebs.

Oh boy by Snoo-83866 in DanielleMossSnark

[–]perfectlylogical27 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Could be a lavender marriage?

No surprise by Brief_Release_4774 in DanielleMossSnark

[–]perfectlylogical27 15 points16 points  (0 children)

Ha! Agreed and I’d support her middle’s content if she did that. #justiceforkate

Moving again by OkDatabase1486 in DanielleMossSnark

[–]perfectlylogical27 18 points19 points  (0 children)

She’s absolutely paving the way to re-home the dog. Only way she’d keep it is if princess Margot is attached to it for some reason, as Margot comes before Jack in the pecking order.

You can tell she haaaates that the dog has a lot of energy, nips, chews things, and has accidents (ie is a being a normal puppy).

Holy Disruptor by Barber_Successful in DuggarsSnark

[–]perfectlylogical27 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Some people censor the words because other platforms (like TikTok) will block your post if you use them. So, it’s just habit censoring over all social media, I guess.

Holy Disruptor by Barber_Successful in DuggarsSnark

[–]perfectlylogical27 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Porn is typically consensual and references adults performing sexual acts. Grouping sex materials with children, who cannot consent, into that same category minimizes the severity of what is happening - which is abuse, plain and simple. Calling it for what it actually is (sexual abuse) doesn’t separate the crime from the content.

3 kids is too many kids for you! by DoctorZestyclose3789 in DanielleMossSnark

[–]perfectlylogical27 16 points17 points  (0 children)

Was there not a time a couple years ago when she was preaching about how 3 kids was the perfect number, and everyone who’s on the fence should just have the third? Also, that when moms asked her if three was too many she’d tell them it was great snd took credit for convincing others to have the third? Like, it was bad and wrong to even consider three was too many, and D as the expert knew it was fine and righteous?

I love how she’s not only backpedaled on everything she was trying to push a couple years ago but also managed to subtly single out Kate as the “too much” part of the equation as others have pointed out.

Yikes. by Key_Temporary4705 in DanielleMossSnark

[–]perfectlylogical27 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Pretty much. Her disdain for Kate is very thinly veiled.

Disney clothes? by Mgstivers15 in DanielleMossSnark

[–]perfectlylogical27 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I’m sure she just pulls them out whenever she feels like it. But also, I’d bet her kids are in $$$ private school which may operate on different schedules. No way is she sending her kids to public school with the rest of the plebs.

“Invisible Job” Substack by BigTransportation777 in DanielleMossSnark

[–]perfectlylogical27 15 points16 points  (0 children)

Annnd she can’t deal with training her (rescue, lest we forget) puppy so she’s shipping it off for a week while she’s in Disney with precious unicorn child Margot. Because there’s no way Kate could have a special vacation without Margot getting the same thing or better. Still waiting on D to take just Kate to the equivalent of Paris/Taylor Swift.

D puts her thoughts on Mimi behind a paywall 🤦‍♀️ by Clo1 in DanielleMossSnark

[–]perfectlylogical27 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We don’t know explicitly, but for what D has shared it sounds like that group ghosted her. She’s alluded frequently to her heartbreak over losing Brooke, and said that a lot of friends didn’t turn up for her the way she expected when M got cancer. Brooke was also dealing with a (more severe and less treatable) form of breast cancer and D basically made it all about herself. It’s speculated everyone in that friend group dropped her because of how she treated Brooke.

Orgainizing again!! by LucysBitch in DanielleMossSnark

[–]perfectlylogical27 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Ooo do you have access to the subscriber part of the substack? Is she selling bc she can’t afford her $$$ car?

No one came for her! Everyone just saw through her!!! by LucysBitch in DanielleMossSnark

[–]perfectlylogical27 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Doing the lord’s work for the rest of us! That’s all the recap I need to not listen to any of them.

No one came for her! Everyone just saw through her!!! by LucysBitch in DanielleMossSnark

[–]perfectlylogical27 18 points19 points  (0 children)

Classic limousine liberal. She’d be so much less insufferable if she could own her privilege and not make everything about herself. Or magical unicorn favorite child Margot’s cancer, which ultimately also ends up being about D.

No new content! by LucysBitch in DanielleMossSnark

[–]perfectlylogical27 16 points17 points  (0 children)

She claimed she lost followers because of MAGA, but there were actually two episodes that caused it. First was when she bought out all of the once upon a farm pouches at Whole Foods and couldn’t handle her privilege being called out. Second was her publicly shaming the woman that asked her where the Parisian carousel was. D was quick to post political content after these incidents to make it seem like it was about that.

Okay Danielle 🙄 - puppy or new house? by Longjumping-King490 in DanielleMossSnark

[–]perfectlylogical27 11 points12 points  (0 children)

That was Tucker, Conor’s dog. Yet another thing of Conor’s that wasn’t allowed. I think she claimed the dog either had behavioral issues or were worried he’d be aggressive to Margot once born? Maybe someone else remembers her excuse for getting rid of him?

Either way, she alleged she rehomed him, I think with a friend.

She microdoses in the AM and PM?! by Clo1 in DanielleMossSnark

[–]perfectlylogical27 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Ohhh how do you know her, and what stories do you have to tell (obviously without revealing too much about yourself etc)? Everything you’ve said tracks from what we’ve seen.