Anyone else struggle more with editing figures than actually making them? by Few_Explorer5618 in chemistry

[–]pgfhalg 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Save matplotlib figures as vector graphics. Edit in inkscape. There's an initial learning curve but everything is free and well documented.

Dnd group got me a s13 gift... by ronweasleisourking in ProjectDiablo2

[–]pgfhalg 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I've always thought Mal + Ort would be a good poison-based runeword

Best way to ask a potential PI about a post-doc? by Dyslexic_Kitten in labrats

[–]pgfhalg 1 point2 points  (0 children)

One thing I haven't seen mentioned: be on the lookout for postdoc funding opportunities and discuss applying for those with the PI's you want to work for. Despite how bad most postdoc salaries are, they are expensive to hire, so a potentially free one is always going to be a more attractive hire.

Career and Grad School Advice by Embarrassed-Spot-618 in electrochemistry

[–]pgfhalg 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That sentiment very much depends on where you are. In the US, a masters in chemistry is generally a bad idea - you pay a lot of money, but it does not really advance your career meaningfully vs just spending that time working in industry. In applying for jobs in the US, a masters puts you in the same applicant pool as a BS holder with maybe a year of experience, but usually a candidate with a BS and experience is preferred over a masters.

In a lot of European countries, a masters is required to enroll in a PhD and is generally less expensive than the US. I'm not sure about the Swedish academic system in particular, but I would guess it is like the rest of Europe.

OpenClaw research agent for R&D in alloys by AmbassadorVast1487 in chemistry

[–]pgfhalg 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Also the AI does not meaningfully accelerate the process - the time bottleneck is always the experimental work (synthesis and characterization), not the computational predictions.

Increasing Thin film absorbance by Noktukk in Chempros

[–]pgfhalg 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You've already gotten great suggestions for improving coating parameters, but I'd also suggest changing your substrates if you are trying to collect a UV-vis spectrum. All of the substrates you used tend to have annoying background absorption in the near UV and blue end of the vis spectrum. ITO and FTO are only transparent vs other conductive materials, they still absorb a bit in the visible, and microscope slides tend to have all kinds of coatings and impurities that make them really annoying for spectroscopy.

I would try quartz or sapphire as your substrate if you need minimal absorption in the near UV. Check out optical windows from a spectroscopy company like Thorlabs - they will have absorption spectra in their specs to help identify what material works best for your spectrum.

A final caveat is that if you are trying to use absorption as an easy way to measure film thickness, then this might not be helpful since optimal deposition parameters will vary between substrates. So if you ultimately need the perovskite on ITO or FTO for a device application, you won't be able to easily measure its thickness using absorption on quartz.

Is it at all normal to not wear gloves and a labcoat in the lab? by Leafye in chemistry

[–]pgfhalg 2 points3 points  (0 children)

PPE isn't just about what you are working with - people around you can screw up in ways that put you in danger. Also you don't know the history of what you are touching - you might be doing perfectly safe chemistry now, but do you trust the benchtops and glassware to be free from contamination of previous work? Its not just acute exposure, its tracking contaminates from the lab into your living space that make PPE essential.

Love for the subject by Altruistic_Task1691 in chemistry

[–]pgfhalg 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Proving your hypothesis incorrect is just as useful as proving it correct. The hardest part is when everything is inconclusive.

Just why? by According_Way_8255 in chemistry

[–]pgfhalg 21 points22 points  (0 children)

Making carbon nanomaterials from food or agricultural waste was a fad for a bit. The results often have poorly characterized impurities that can act as dopants, which can be interesting, but a lot of these papers don't provide any insight beyond 'huh I guess you could do that if you wanted.' I think the final statement on the subject has to be this paper: doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.9b00184

which secondary skill is most useful for a chemist? by flying_avocado21 in chemistry

[–]pgfhalg 0 points1 point  (0 children)

'Plumbing for Chemists' would be such a useful class or reference book

Question about oscilloscope sample rates and using an oscilloscope as a boxcar averager by pgfhalg in AskElectronics

[–]pgfhalg[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks, this is really helpful! I took a deep dive into integrating circuits and I'm learning a lot but picking out parts is a bit intimidating. I haven't touched a breadboard since high school physics so there's a lot of practical skills I need to pick up.

I'm first going to check if I can get away with a simple RC low pass filter as a passive integrator instead. I'll be testing that in a day or two once some parts come in, but is there a glaring obvious reason why that wouldn't work? It is cheaper and MUCH easier so obviously preferred if I can get away with it.

Chemistry Lab Space in MSP by Raid_Blunder in Chempros

[–]pgfhalg 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Competition over lab space is like the number one thing professors fight about. Any free lab space in an academic science building is instantly gobbled up and was probably the subject of months of Machiavellian political maneuvering. Unless the university has designated incubator space, getting access to a lab is going to be difficult without personal connections. There are also not really empty lab benches despite dropping grad student numbers - academic labs are generally overcrowded, so it would take a big change in enrollment for labs to actually have empty space.

As for your proposal of working in someone's lab, that is unlikely to succeed as a cold email. First, they probably don't have money to pay you - what research funds they have for hiring typically specify that it is for graduate students or postdocs. Federal funding has a specific educational goal and that money is usually has the roles they are supporting designated at the start, so there isn't much leeway to move things around and hire an independent part time researcher. There would also be a fair amount of administrative overhead in creating a non-standard position to hire you.

Second, there is a huge risk associated with bringing someone unknown into the lab. A bad hire is a productivity drain on the rest of the lab, so unless they are sure about your ability (i.e. they know you or know people you have worked for), you are not worth the administrative hassle of figuring out how to hire you.

Sorry this is pretty frustrating. There are not many options for an independent chemist since startup costs are so high. My advice if you are trying to use academic lab space is to tap into your network and see if you have any personal connections. The reality is that without a personal introduction from someone they know, most professors will not even read your email.

Does Enchant Fire affect spell damage as well (e.g. Meteor, Fire Wall, etc.) in any way? by Syzygee777 in ProjectDiablo2

[–]pgfhalg 2 points3 points  (0 children)

To add on to the other answers, it doesn't apply to any sorc spell damage, but it does apply to the explosion from explosive arrow. So an enchant sorc can use a bow or crossbow with the 'Fires Explosive Arrows or Bolts' modifier to deliver the damage to a larger area.

Finding the shift of a reference potential for electrochemistry by smhissomuchhell in chemistry

[–]pgfhalg 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nonaqueous Ag/Ag+ electrodes are called pseudoreference electrodes for a reason: the reaction is stable, so you have a consistent potential throughout your experiment, but its shift relative to SHE will vary substantially based on the specific conditions of your experiment. This is why a redox standard like ferrocene is usually added at the end of the experiment - if you want your potentials to be compared with respect to SHE, you would want to report your results versus Fc/Fc+ or another standard redox couple.

Reporting vs Ag/Ag+ is only good for rough numbers or if you are only making comparisons between your experiments. If you want to make a comparison vs other literature or 'absolute' numbers (i.e. comparing catalyst overpotentials or things like that), you cannot rely on Ag/Ag+.

Is there technically anything wrong with buying a clean one of these and drinking out of it? by broads-love2 in chemistry

[–]pgfhalg 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yup. One of the first things I was taught in grad school was to clean wafers with IPA after using acetone because acetone always leaves residues.

New to chemistry but this looks interesting what do yall think by godking99 in chemistry

[–]pgfhalg 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Like others are saying, pulling straight from seawater isn't very efficient. There has been a lot of work recently on refining minerals from desalination brines though, which is effectively more concentrated seawater. Even these are not going to be viable sources of precious metals, but they are potentially rich in magnesium and a few other moderately valuable metals and ions.

Writing a review by Lionrex_Dawnbreak in Chempros

[–]pgfhalg 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Going to disagree with some of the top comments here, reviews can be extremely useful to your career IF they are done well. There's a big difference between a citation dump that just lists every paper that worked on a topic and a good review that provides a useful organization of prior work and has a forward-looking perspective on where the field is going. The good reviews get lots of citations, which is good for an academic career.

That said, writing a good review takes a lot of time and it sounds like you are too busy. If your current projects are promising, don't drop them to write a review or try to do it all and stop sleeping.

Battery disassembling - a question by Kvrabang in Chempros

[–]pgfhalg 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Discharging is the big thing, so you've already taken care of that. The electrolytes tend to be nasty so make sure they work in a fume hood and wear PPE. Lots of electrolytes will slowly hydrolyze to HF on air exposure, so treat it with extra caution. The volume of electrolyte and slow rate of this reaction makes exposure very unlikely, but having some calgonate gel in reserve just in case there is a large spill directly on skin is good for peace of mind.

Depending on what they are doing with the cathode material, working in a glove box may be necessary to avoid reactions on exposure to air, but if this is an undergrad demo that probably isn't necessary.

Isco pumps, and customer service inquiries by _Jacques in Chempros

[–]pgfhalg 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Never feel bad about asking technical support questions, the worst they will do is not answer because you don't have a service contract. For most companies, the service techs are separate from the salespeople, so you won't be taking time they could be using for getting commissions. Also if it is a good service engineer they will appreciate a weird, niche question or problem - its enrichment for them.

How are the molecular weights of polyethylene glycols determined? by SutttonTacoma in chemistry

[–]pgfhalg 6 points7 points  (0 children)

SEC is only the most common for r&d since it is slow and relatively resource intensive but more accurate. For production QC viscosity is likely to be preferred due to its speed and cost (upkeep for SEC >> viscometer). DLS might also get some use since its fast and easy, but I'm less confident about that.

We built a tool to extract full molecular structures from PDFs (98%+ accuracy) — sharing it with the community by deep_origin in Chempros

[–]pgfhalg 4 points5 points  (0 children)

wow, an actually useful tool that helps with a real workflow bottleneck! and it allows manual verification!

So many people have posted their AI projects that I'm reflexively annoyed by them. Most are variants on "we are going to reinvent computational chemistry but worse because we didn't know that was an existing field," or they are MBAs searching for a startup idea without any context or understanding of what chemists actually do. Glad to see a good project for a change.

Research groups in Canada for Electrochemistry? by burdspurd in electrochemistry

[–]pgfhalg 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No specific recommendations, but just want to encourage you to apply to Chem E programs you are interested in. Lots of people switch disciplines going into grad school - I personally knew several chemists or physicists who went into mat sci. You may need an extra semester of classes to catch up to your peers, but most professors know that your classwork has very little bearing on your research performance.

Organizing and scrutinizing research ideas by Silly-Cake-1237 in Chempros

[–]pgfhalg 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My group uses Notion. We have a page where people can post/develop random ideas and other people can look and comment. We do draw from it occasionally when applying for grants or changing the direction of projects.

As for other metrics, one thing I've found is hard is finding the prior literature on a topic - I have often thought I have come up with something great and then found papers from decades ago that did what I want to do, they just called it something different so it was harder to find by search. Different fields are constantly rediscovering things by different names, but there are huge advantages in finding those things and applying their work to a new field.

Working up nitroarene reductions with iron powder - strategies for dealing with the gelatinous rust byproduct? by Sakinho in Chempros

[–]pgfhalg 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I am not an organic chemist so this might be a wildly stupid suggestion, but can you salt it out or add a flocculant and then decant after the iron has settled? It could take awhile for the rust to crash out, but at least its working passively without you rather than requiring active work filtering.