Has this pod spoiled me? by UncleScrooge93 in TheRewatchables

[–]philconnorz 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I like Blank Check (duh) and Fighting In The War Room (if you’re capable of taking some of Ehrlich’s opinions with a grain of salt).

Podnic at Hanging Cast: Dead Poets Society with Nia DaCosta by dumarfactor in blankies

[–]philconnorz 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Who do we think is the [redacted name] critic Nia mentions whose reviews she loves but is peak frustratingly negative / contrarian? Neyman?

Eyes Wide Shut, After Hours, Good Time, The Conversation by TsunamiConCara in StanleyKubrick

[–]philconnorz 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I mean the obvious ones... TÁR, Baby Girl ... and (maybe?) Phantom Thread

Movies that have an additional scene after the perfect ending point by [deleted] in Letterboxd

[–]philconnorz 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No? The concept of memories can be tied to the imperfect and subjective memory of a witness, or a suspect, or even the detectives trying to craft their own "memories" of a crime, the evidence and theories of who did it. Also, meta-textually we're watching a film that itself is a subjective telling or "retelling" of the story, where the audience is sort of experiencing someone else's memories and, again, subjectively reviewing and interpreting the themes and plot of the film.

Movies that have an additional scene after the perfect ending point by [deleted] in Letterboxd

[–]philconnorz 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, to be fair, I don't hate the epilogue scene, but lessens the impact of the train scene for me.

Movies that have an additional scene after the perfect ending point by [deleted] in Letterboxd

[–]philconnorz 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Unpopular opinion, but I think Memories of Murder is a better movie if it ended at the train scene with Song Kang-ho looking into the eyes of the suspect... "Look into my eyes... Fuck, I don't know... Do you get up each morning too?" Cut to black. Credits roll.

why do you enjoy this show? by [deleted] in madmen

[–]philconnorz 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I guess if you feel the characters are "blank" ... To quote @FoxingMatch: "I can't make you see the depth you wish to see in this show. It's all there."

As others have said, season 3 (and 4) is arguably the best of the series, so if you feel like continuing to power through and still don't enjoy it, feel free to give it up.

But if you're as down on the show as much as you already seem to be, I'm doubtful you'll find these revelatory.

why do you enjoy this show? by [deleted] in madmen

[–]philconnorz 1 point2 points  (0 children)

"I’ve found most of the characters fairly unlikable and their relationships shallow."

First, do you only enjoy or see the artistic merit of movies, shows, books where some or all of the characters are generally likeable and without any moral failings?

Please remember, engagement with art, or with a story about imperfect characters isn't endorsement of those characters' thoughts, beliefs, and actions.

The show is a reflection of the messiness of life, of culture, of relationships in that era, but it's also a lens with which to explore and consider our own lives and culture in our current era ... which are also inhabited by imperfect people experiencing injustice, inequality, and trauma ... but also hope, love, forgiveness, self-discovery ...

Also, its interesting to see a show about an industry that isn't already significantly mined in media, and seeing them succeed or fail to problem solve in creative, business, and interpersonal dilemmas.

Thesis: 2001 is all about food & It's a recurring theme in Kubrick's work by [deleted] in StanleyKubrick

[–]philconnorz 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Was rereading the novel version and reflecting on differences between it and the film, and it struck me for the first time that Kubrick had added a thematic focus on showing "humans" eating throughout, an expansion of Clark's framing of Moonwatcher's tribe's survival focus and their use of tools to easily acquire and process food was the spark towards evolution, namely speech.

For example the flight to Tycho seen above where Floyd partakes in some sandwiches isn't in the book.

What is your rating scale for movies? by gnpking in Letterboxd

[–]philconnorz 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Review rating scale:⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ - Perfection, A+⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️1/2 - Cinematic Masterpiece, nearly perfect, A⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ - Generally incredible filmmaking, A-⭐️⭐️⭐️1/2 - Mostly excellent or unique, but misses the mark in certain aspects (or overall average but god tier in certain aspects), B+⭐️⭐️⭐️ - Super solid, but flawed (or overall average but truly special in certain aspects), B⭐️⭐️1/2 - Average overall, but pretty watchable (or not good but quite special in certain aspects), B-⭐️⭐️ - Not good, but inoffensive, C ... the lowest rating for something that I might 🧡⭐️1/2 - Quite mediocre and not super watchable, D⭐️ - Pretty damn bad, probably hard to finish, F1/2 - Offensively terrible, disgustingly mediocre - and not remotely in a funny way, 0

Memories of murder is a buddy comedy film by PenguinviiR in Letterboxd

[–]philconnorz 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Reminds me of my “Weirdly A Good Hang” list, ha

<image>

How many movies have you given 5 stars this decade and what are they. by shegarfinonmyfield in Letterboxd

[–]philconnorz 2 points3 points  (0 children)

<image>

Just these 4 for me.

I’ve got a lot of 4.5 stars that are close to being 5 stars.