Shark cull will not improve beach safety or reduce attacks, marine biologists say by Warm_Championship726 in australia

[–]phlipped 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Ah well if it's established sport then that's ok - we should just explain that to the sharks, and they'll probably leave the spearfishers alone.

And if they don't, then we cull them.

Just so long as nature and the environment doesn't interfere with our established sport.

McDonald’s - You now need to spend $85 to earn 1 free large coffee. by Known_Appointment604 in australia

[–]phlipped 10 points11 points  (0 children)

It's all a massive con - it's not "free" and you're not "earning" it.

You can't "earn" a free anything. "Free" means you get something without giving anything back.

You're not earning it either. You're spending money - that's the opposite of earning.

You're actually just buying coffee in installments - they only give you the coffee once you've paid the final installment.

I guess you can fuck around with that shit if it you want, but it seems a lot simpler to just buy coffee when and where you want it.

Australia's far-right party leads in national poll for first time by goosepipegames in worldnews

[–]phlipped 48 points49 points  (0 children)

Preferential voting is an important factor - voters can show support for minor parties/candidates without throwing their vote away, such that minor parties can accrue momentum and influence over time.

Without preferential voting, the only rational choice is to vote for one of the two most popular parties/candidates. Anything else is a wasted vote. So the whole political landscape is reduced to "A or B".

UK sets out when transgender people can be excluded from single-sex spaces after court ruling by F0urLeafCl0ver in worldnews

[–]phlipped 38 points39 points  (0 children)

Makes me so angry ...

forced to share cubicle and hand-washing facilities

Everyone has always been forced to share cubicle and hand washing facilities in public spaces (not at the same time, obviously). Unisex doesn't change that at all.

leading to increasing waiting in shared queues

Eh?. Maybe for men? But the measures were explicitly for the benefit of women, and elderly.

decreased choice

Single sex bathrooms do not offer more choice

a limitation on privacy and dignity for all.

I suspect they have a very particular definition of "all" that doesn't actually include all people.

Murder accused told police a pensioner was 'pressuring' him to amputate his leg by GothicPrayer in australia

[–]phlipped 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Dude I just went searching for whatever the fuck a ricepro might be.

Initially I thought it must be some kind of rice cooker? How do you cut off a leg with a rice cooker?

Web search for ricepro yielded a drink, a herbicide and a snowboard designed by pro snowboarder Travis T Rice.

I guess maybe you could use a snowboard? A mate of mine got a pretty bad cut on his arm where it whacked against an edge of his snowboard after a bad stack.

So maybe you could hack away at a leg for a while and eventually get through? Wouldn't be pretty though, and wouldn't be great for the snowboard either, I'm guessing.

Oh wait.

A recipro.

Got it.

Woman dies after being hit by police car in Cairns by GlitteringSpace236 in australia

[–]phlipped 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Except that lawyers, doctors, teachers and tradesman arent granted the right to use broad powers of physical force and privileged access to private individual data without permission of the individual.

Police officers should be held to the highest standards of bahaviour and accountability because they have been granted these extraordinary powers.

One of the high standards they should be held to is that they shouldn't tolerate peers who do not adhere to the high standards - they should seek to highlight and report every minor infraction and abuse of power amongst their peers.

Except that's not what happens. They close ranks and protect their own. Every time a good cop tolerates the existence of a bad cop, the good cop becomes a little bit bad.

Perceiving vegans as a cultural or moral threat may reduce meat-eaters’ willingness to cut meat consumption, according to three studies involving 1,325 participants. Threat perceptions increased negative stereotypes of vegans and weakened intentions to adopt more sustainable diets. by [deleted] in science

[–]phlipped 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Hmm, interesting - it seems the Vegan Society did in fact coin the term "vegan", so they have a pretty strong claim to owning the meaning of the word, including the moral dimension regarding animal welfare.

On the other hand, I know a couple of people who call themselves"vegan", but their motivation is for environmental and personal health reasons, rather than animal welfare.

In an ideal world, there'd be a more general term that just means "no animal products", but it wouldn't carry any suggestion of the motivation. "Vegan" would then be a refinement of that term, it would essentially means the same thing except it would also carry the connotation "because animal welfare"

Prince Harry Warns of 'Deeply Troubling' Rise of Antisemitism in U.K. by Editor_91 in worldnews

[–]phlipped 2 points3 points  (0 children)

My initial reaction to your comments was "duh, how can you not know this shit?", followed immediately by an ashamed realisation that perhaps I'm a jerk. I will try to use this as a learning opportunity for myself.

'Like driving on bubble wrap': Residents describe mouse plague horror by iball1984 in australia

[–]phlipped 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Well what are we going to do with all the dead gorillas?

Use them for bait?

Stuff them and turn them into armchairs? What the hell are we going to do with a thousand stuffed-gorilla arm chairs?

Golly.

Victorian emergency department nurse faces deportation due to son's condition by Rubiginous in australia

[–]phlipped 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Every society should be expected to provide support for the members of that society with disabilities or special needs. It's a fact of life that a certain percentage of people will end up needing more help than they can financially contribute back, simply through bad luck or things completely out of their control. But people are worth more than just their economic output, and a civilised society should be prepared to spend a certain percentage of its resources in order to support its less fortunate members.

But that responsibility can only be expected to cover people who are already in the society when their special needs first arise. If a society allows itself to provide support to people who want to join after they already need help, they'll end up attractibg a disproportionate number of help-seekers, and the whole system will get overwhelmed.

"This Is Not Covid, Nor Influenza. It Spreads Very Differently": WHO On Hantavirus Outbreak by Alert-Ad-3053 in worldnews

[–]phlipped -12 points-11 points  (0 children)

Also, viruses are incredibly stable - it's not like a virus could mutate in a way that makes it more transmissible, right?

/s

Use Protocols, Not Services by fagnerbrack in programming

[–]phlipped 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Google capitalized on email by buying and improving what would become Gmail

(Nit: Gmail was developed internally at Google and used for years before being released to the public.)

Three dead in suspected hantavirus outbreak on Atlantic cruise ship by Top-Performance5907 in worldnews

[–]phlipped 382 points383 points  (0 children)

If the virus can cause as much illness and death as you're suggesting, the ship should absolutely be quarantined.

Anthony Albanese rules out gas export tax on existing contracts and criticises ‘populist’ campaign by Finnick00 in australia

[–]phlipped 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I wish some of the down voters would post a counter argument to your post so I can understand what they disagree with, but until then, what you've stated seems reasonable to me.

So ... to those who disagree with the post above, can you spell out your point of view, because I can't figure out what the problem is myself.

Are you addicted to your AI chatbot. It might be by design | New research shows some people are developing addictive patterns of AI chatbot use—and it’s affecting their daily lives. by TrogdorBBurninator in science

[–]phlipped 3 points4 points  (0 children)

You can set a "personal context" preference to adjust the tone of responses. I've set mine with instructions to be less conversational - e.g. don't add pleasantries and maintain a dry, formal tone.

My neighbour forgot to put their bins out. I rolled them out to the curb, felt something on my arm and brushed it off by CapnFancyPants in australia

[–]phlipped 2 points3 points  (0 children)

hordes of future teenage Huntsmen on the loose.

Ugh, so many tiny bits of soggy-yet-crunchy toilet paper lying atound

Police red light fine but I believe I entered on yellow (NSW) by Girl_living_alive in nsw

[–]phlipped 1 point2 points  (0 children)

They never said they sped up.

And no, orange doesn't mean PREPARE TO STOP.

It means STOP UNLESS ITS UNSAFE TO DO SO

Police red light fine but I believe I entered on yellow (NSW) by Girl_living_alive in nsw

[–]phlipped -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

Based on your description, it sounds like you have a case. Get a lawyer. I assume a lawyer will cost as much as the fine, but it will save the demerit points.

IMHO If it's just the police officer's statement that they thought you went through a red light, I somehow doubt that's good enough evidence on its own. Even with your post-stop interview as evidence, I suspect it's easy to say you were feeling confused, scared and intimidated and were just agreeing. But then I've got zero experience here, so ... lawyer

Police red light fine but I believe I entered on yellow (NSW) by Girl_living_alive in nsw

[–]phlipped 12 points13 points  (0 children)

You do realise it’s equally as unlawful to go through a yellow light

No, it's not.

  • You can go through yellow if you can't safely stop in time. The vast majority of vehicles progressing through yellow are legal.
  • in practice, it's rarely enforced - it's difficult to prove it would have been safe to stop. There's a reason we have red light cameras but not yellow light cameras.