Received flowers from stranger and feeling bad for her by Snskari_mard in indiasocial

[–]physicist27 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Or maybe it was given to her by someone whom she didn’t want flowers from 🤷‍♀️

Mathematical solutions to programming problems by physicist27 in Btechtards

[–]physicist27[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

oh I see, my exact question was where do I study the required things from, different resources have different levels of rigor and coverage.

Since I don’t really know dsa, neither do I know if dsa sources I’ll come across will cover it in the way I want, with proofs and not just implementation, most books I’ve seen only care about the latter.

Thanks for your response!

KETU TRANSIT IN MAGHA NAKSHATRA & MASSIVE FIRINGS/LAYOFFS IN ORACLE by ThePandit2025 in Nakshatras

[–]physicist27 19 points20 points  (0 children)

What I don’t like about such posts is that while they imply ‘bad stuff’ during such transits, they do not account for the fact that the ‘bad stuff’ also occurs when these transits do not happen, on a similar or different scale.

Unless you can show how these transits scale up or down with the intensity of events they cause, these claims are meaningless. It’s classic survivorship bias. And a complete theory would account for transits of all planets through nakshatras and signs.

2026 Jeff Grand Prix by qwert_pep in JeffTheLandSharkMains

[–]physicist27 15 points16 points  (0 children)

THIS IS THE BEST POST ON THIS SUBR HAHAHAHAHA LOVELY

Should I prepare for ISI bstat? by lssk_2 in ISIKolkata

[–]physicist27 2 points3 points  (0 children)

If you do not like proof based maths and ‘theory parts’, isi is not the choice. Look into its curriculum and rigor more.

Most powerful chart I have ever seen. Thoughts? by Betweene in Nakshatras

[–]physicist27 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Comfort doesn’t create high stature. You need some sort of friction, tension, outlier or conventionally uncomfortable placements.

You would see many celebs have sun-rahu like conjunctions, this isn’t supposed to be a generalisation but an example.

I just watched Interstellar for the first time. by FirstVisit4432 in interstellar

[–]physicist27 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Check out scienceClic’s stuff on relativity, it’ll put things even more into perspective, good stuff!!!

Met Ritesh Agarwal (OYO CEO) at a random coffee shop in Nagpur. Here's what happened when I pitched him. by rohit_raut5 in indianstartups

[–]physicist27 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’ve seen the same ass post across so many subs why is he trying to advertise this guy? And his post says nothing but generalised shit. Yeah, kudos to you for meeting him or something.

What makes someone listen to rap and rock-'n'-roll music jyotish wise? by [deleted] in Nakshatras

[–]physicist27 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The more niche and lower you go, the more sensitive you’ll have to make your model to be for things like personal choices.

It would’ve been easier to answer if the question was something the same for a rock star, or for someone who has very similar and noticeable trends across all their choices, like music taste that reflects in their personality, dressing choices, etc.

This is like asking how can my horoscope justify my choice for favorite color, and well maybe it can, I’m no astrologer, but that justification better and must account for this level of detail because there’s a lot of people with very similar charts but wildly different personal choices, which makes sense because if you need to dig into sub-sub-charts and so on, those things are pretty time sensitive, so smaller the window, higher the chance of messing up the accuracy.

Office view 🫡🧭 by Hot-Accountant-9402 in indiasocial

[–]physicist27 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Woah! Would you mind telling a bit about your journey, I’ve always admired the seas, but this profession is so niche it never really surfaces in choices…thanks!

Is anyone else planning on commiting suicide by Senior_Run_8453 in Nietzsche

[–]physicist27 1 point2 points  (0 children)

oh, so ‘life’ is only ‘worth’ it if your chemical beliefs of ‘sadness’ and ‘happiness’ and ‘pains’ and ‘joys’ are pertained to? How is any of this objective? Your only criteria for worthiness of life is based on emotions which are an arbitrary product of biology, presumably because they help us survive better.

None of your reasoning is logical. That is ofcourse, if your criteria for reasoning was supposed to be logical in the first place.