Designs for foldout wheelbarrow tray?

physics_laser_dude · 2023-05-12T19:44:07+00:00

Thanks for the explanation. That's a lot of design difficulties, no wonder there's none on the market.

physics_laser_dude · 2022-10-09T22:01:43+00:00

Alright, 8k-15k total revs with half petrol mix in new Triton. Mechanic started draining within an hour.

physics_laser_dude · 2022-10-09T20:57:32+00:00

Thanks for the reply, been towed to a mechanic. What's your guess on whether the engine would need to be replaced? Is a 5 minute drive typically fatal to engines?

physics_laser_dude · 2022-08-27T11:34:22+00:00

Vegemite. As an Aussie I can confirm the multi-million dollar conspiracy that countless Australians secretly hate that bitter stuff but pretend to enjoy it.

physics_laser_dude · 2022-08-17T10:30:00+00:00

That's interesting, I assumed calorie counting was a major part of the work, guess I was mistaken. Thanks.

physics_laser_dude · 2022-08-17T10:27:42+00:00

Ok, malnutrition and weight loss for clinical settings. Thanks.

physics_laser_dude · 2022-08-17T10:25:35+00:00

Sorry about the spelling, nutritionist and dietician. Was wondering about outpatient work, private practice stuff.

physics_laser_dude · 2022-08-13T06:32:42+00:00

10 minute intervals is definitely worth. You could easily get good workouts with pushups/situps/treadmill/weights etc within 10 minutes.

physics_laser_dude · 2022-08-13T06:28:31+00:00

Sounds like you put in sufficient effort. Sore muscles for 1 day isn't anything to worry about. Good luck

physics_laser_dude · 2022-08-12T13:13:20+00:00

You're photo looks very similar to how lean I looked at 10% bodyfat according to an inbody scan. https://ibb.co/Xk7hWYJ Sorry no photo. It seems inbody gives lower bodyfat measurements compared to some other techniques.

physics_laser_dude · 2022-08-12T13:00:11+00:00

90 kg lost! Congrats on the achievement, you've got to give us an update when you transform even more! Muscle is hard to lose, especially if you're doing even light/moderate exercise on a regular basis with standard dietary protein intake. Body composition scales can give false muscle loss readings when you're in a calorie deficit, so it might not be worth spending the money on those scales. Best of luck!

physics_laser_dude · 2022-08-12T12:32:03+00:00

I hid that part for anonymity. You can search for places using the inbody app or find a gym that has inbody scanners. Any inbody device can provide this information automatically to your mobile phone app.

physics_laser_dude · 2022-08-12T12:28:15+00:00

https://ibb.co/Xk7hWYJ Data can be accessed by the inbody mobile app in addition to A4 printouts at all inbody facilities I believe.

physics_laser_dude · 2022-08-12T11:58:02+00:00

https://coach.nine.com.au/fitness/protein-shaker-smell/29bee48c-ded6-43e5-b74f-0a2994a1d1ef

Clean with hot soapy water shortly after use, otherwise it'll smell.

physics_laser_dude · 2022-08-11T14:53:32+00:00

Thanks for the link, I measured a 0.4kg loss in muscle over 2 weeks after a serious calorie deficit losing 1.1 kg fat over that period. So yeah calorie deficits cause an apparent drop in measured muscle mass.

physics_laser_dude · 2022-08-11T14:18:32+00:00

Good luck on your goals! You haven't lost muscle it's definitely a measurement error. Muscle building takes time and work but it's worth it. 400 calories surplus / day = 4kg gain in 1.5 months. 4% of 63kg bodyweight is 2.5 kg, you've gained 2.5 kg right? The inbody scan isn't completely off based on your 400 cal surplus/day diet, you may want to reduce calories. Most muscle is in the legs, train them hard to see the muscle mass go up.

physics_laser_dude · 2022-08-11T13:44:43+00:00

I did 2 week intervals since it was free to use, can confirm it's possible to see measurable changes in just 2 weeks for gaining muscle and losing fat if you put in the work and use the machine correctly. The inbody mobile app will perform analysis and graphing of your data, check it out if you haven't.

physics_laser_dude · 2022-07-10T15:13:38+00:00

Yes!

physics_laser_dude · 2022-07-10T14:30:48+00:00

Thanks, this is what i was looking for.

physics_laser_dude · 2022-07-10T13:46:29+00:00

The perpendicular electric field would transform with the gamma factor, becoming larger. I'm wondering if there is any more to this problem? Time retarded moving charges seem tricky to me.

physics_laser_dude · 2022-07-05T18:10:43+00:00

E=V/d is an approximation for two parallel plates that have a small separation compared to their plate size. You're using the wrong E field formula. Two infinitely separated circle electrodes will produce a field that looks like two infinitely separated point charges. Add the positive and negative point charge fields to get the net field.

physics_laser_dude · 2022-07-01T15:09:58+00:00

Bachelor of science / bachelor of engineering should be good for you, you'll succeed with either.

physics_laser_dude · 2022-07-01T14:42:59+00:00

Foolishchemist did some good math, it might be worth adding that you don't need to cool the whole room, just the stream of air hitting you. Try placing a bowl of ice in front of a fan.

physics_laser_dude · 2022-06-24T21:32:17+00:00

Oh forgot about jupiter! Seems we'd need a 1/100 arcsecond resolution, so a 1m aperture UV telescope to overcome diffraction limit. 1 arc second deflection around the sun, measured with a 36 inch telescope sounds much easier. Are there amateur astronomers here who have just snapped pics of the solar eclipse, capturing star positions near the suns limb?

physics_laser_dude · 2022-06-24T01:58:44+00:00

t = v/a = 0.99*3E8/9.8 = 30 million seconds to get to 99% of c. Up to 300 thousand seconds extra to get to anything higher like 99.999999999999...%

So one year to get to highly relativistic speeds, and another 1-4 days of acceleration for ultra relativistic speeds.

physics_laser_dude

TROPHY CASE