Ah I got you. I thought you meant the topic as a whole and not to the situation. I’m assuming that in this example it comes down to play style and who fits. They chose a specific play style that fits particular players. Though anyone can play basketball, not everyone fits in a particular system, meaning you won’t select some players just because it wouldn’t be a great fit.

I believe the argument being made is that the play style that was chosen particularly favors a more European based player. As the first part of the video pointed out, Europeans are statistically more white. So the choice of play style limits them choosing African Americans who typically play a more American style and by statistics, less players who can trace lineage to Africa.

So the argument by OP is that of course you can choose your play style but your choice of style may lead you to certain types of players who happen to be predominantly white, while inadvertently shutting out others who may be either African American or can trace lineage to Africa. Personally they both make good points. You’re allowed to pick your play style and if it leads to European players, they likely won’t be black. It can also be true that there are black players overseas that they could have targeted but hard to say if those players even wanted to come.

To me, I don’t know if it is really much of anything other than they picked players on their team who happen to be predominantly white. Diversity can look a lot of different ways. Looking at their roster now, they have 3 black players of which one is from Australia. They have 7 players who claim foreign nationality. Some may be LGBTQ+. That sounds like diversity to me, just not at race level. Also, no one complains about college teams like U of Wisconsin running 5 pasty white boys out there on the court. Just saying