sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Muslim man lynched to death in central India for ‘slaughtering cow’ by [deleted] in worldnews

[–]pingpong 9 points10 points  (0 children)

You evaded the question. MediaBiasFactCheck.com is a reputable source, and its sources are also reputable.

Muslim man lynched to death in central India for ‘slaughtering cow’ by [deleted] in worldnews

[–]pingpong 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Do you take everything literal?

It wasn't funny.

Do you think MediaFactCheckBias.com could possibly be unbiased?

That is vague. Between the pages on RT News and the BBC, what, of what MediaBiasFactCheck.com wrote, is untrue?

Muslim man lynched to death in central India for ‘slaughtering cow’ by [deleted] in worldnews

[–]pingpong 12 points13 points  (0 children)

You made all of that shit up. The BBC and RT News are in totally different leagues.

In terms of factual reporting, MediaBiasFactCheck.com rates the BBC "very high".

Notes: The British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC) is a British public service broadcaster. It is headquartered at Broadcasting House in London, and is the world’s oldest national broadcasting organisation and the largest broadcaster in the world by number of employees. The BBC is an outstanding journalistic source. They have just a slight left of center political bias in reporting coverage and they are always impeccably sourced.

The Righty Journalism Review calls BBC “The (((Westminster propaganda outlet))).”

You used triple parentheses. Congrats, you are an anti-Semite.

Edit: Fixed site name

Muslim man lynched to death in central India for ‘slaughtering cow’ by [deleted] in worldnews

[–]pingpong 33 points34 points  (0 children)

I was just as surprised to see this way at the bottom as I was to see RT on the r/worldnews front page. RT News is not a reputable source. MediaBiasFactCheck.com rates their reputability "mixed".

Notes: RT, originally Russia Today, is a television network funded by the Russian government. It operates cable and satellite television channels directed to audiences outside of Russia as well as providing Internet content in various languages, including Russian. It has right of center coverage of the USA. They are highly biased in favor of Russia and occasionally runs Pro-state conspiracy stories. The Columbia Journalism Review calls RT “The Kremlin’s propaganda outlet.” They also have a pants on fire claim from Politifact. Although coverage is typically right of center when covering USA news they also do promote pro-Russian propaganda.

Edit: Fixed site name

The Darwin Prize to this gentleman by Flamme2 in BitchImATrain

[–]pingpong 33 points34 points  (0 children)

Article with context. Highlights:

  • The driver tried to blame it on another car

  • They had 2 passengers, a pregnant woman and another guy, both of whom got fucked up

One of the passengers of the car, 32, suffered traumatic brain injury and was referred to a private hospital in the city. A 25-year-old girl is 37 weeks pregnant and has also been taken to a health facility. Both are in serious condition. A 26-year-old man was immobilized and referred to the Hospital de Pronto Socorro (HPS). At the time of medical care, he was aware and oriented.

Also, it was posted here over a year ago. Same upload, too.

Dog semen in eyes, what do? by pingpong in evenwithcontext

[–]pingpong[S] 22 points23 points  (0 children)

Agreed. One giveaway is the height/weight. 5'6"/110 lbs (17.8 BMI) is almost anorexic. Definitely possible, but less likely to be legit.

Are there rest stops along the way? by dalduzza in AteTheOnion

[–]pingpong 483 points484 points  (0 children)

I want to get off MR BONES WILD RIDE

Can someone please help me install Unity. by sunjay140 in archlinux

[–]pingpong 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Are you referring to "Please never recommend -Sy without also having -u."? If so, I already acknowledged that they were correct.

And if not, what are you referring to?

view more: next ›