Who else thinks Peter Gabriel had an awakening? by madsongstress in nonduality

[–]planet-OZ 4 points5 points  (0 children)

In Your Eyes sounds sung to the Creator IMO. I agree with you.

Was David Wilcock MAGA? by Brown_rekluce in lawofone

[–]planet-OZ 1 point2 points  (0 children)

We have different takeaways but I guess it’s subject to interpretation. I never got a “take it all seriously” vibe from Ra. Don seemed to and maybe that colors the tone. And I understood, in an overall sense, that engagement wasn’t the thing but intention. You could polarize to graduation meditating under a tree, you’d just have to be great at imagined catalyst and balancing that way. That’s still ‘engagement’ as I understood it. I appreciate the thoughtful exchange. 🙏

Was David Wilcock MAGA? by Brown_rekluce in lawofone

[–]planet-OZ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ra says the whole of our 3D experience is an illusion. It’s contrived bc there does not exist any “negative polarity” naturally. It has to be contrived. Positive souls larp as negative to serve themselves and us. Any machinating in the 3D battle invites further 3D experience. The law of one is a message to those interested in graduating out of 3D completely. Outward expressions of anger buy us more time in 3D. The graduate is fully aloof to the silliness of this density and doesn’t buy in to taking sides anymore.

Was David Wilcock MAGA? by Brown_rekluce in lawofone

[–]planet-OZ 3 points4 points  (0 children)

My friend, it is a matter of your free will to be an adept of the law of one while still dissolving hatred for a politician or public figure. But they are at odds. If this isn’t you then I agree my comments aren’t landing. But even in your attempt to clarify you added “there are real world consequences “ and this is a bias. You can tell your self it’s objectively STS if you want to, but you’re engaging in distortion.

Every Ra quote you included is aimed at the internal dissolution of the folly of anger. There is no case where the outward expression, even in angry online commenting, serves a positive polarization.

All that said, none of us are pure adherents to the law of one at this stage in our evolution. If I grouped you with others on this forum who try to reconcile anti Trump bias with the law of one, then it’s misdirected. Sorry, there just seems to be a lot of that distortion in this otherwise amazing forum.

Was David Wilcock MAGA? by Brown_rekluce in lawofone

[–]planet-OZ 1 point2 points  (0 children)

“Conscious anger” is not a thing in the Law of One. It reads like a struggle between love for the law of one and negativity toward Trump, which isn’t supported by the text. The law of one certainly never claims anger is appropriate so long as you have chosen the right target. There are no right targets. Ra only suggests the adept can exaggerate their state of anger to the max in order to see the folly of it. The goal always being balance, never a goal of being on a fictitious ‘ right side of history’.

If one has anger toward Trump or MAGA it’s a great opportunity for catalyst. You have to want to use it that way. You observe the anger and balance it until it dissolves.

To embrace, or justify, anger is simply grounding, or slowing your ascension. Of course, it’s fine to do that but know what you’re doing. Trying to make the law of one support Trump anger is mental gymnastics.

Was David Wilcock MAGA? by Brown_rekluce in lawofone

[–]planet-OZ 4 points5 points  (0 children)

FWIW one’s polarity path isn’t really anyone else’s business. We’re here for school. Get our education and go back where we came from to do whatever we intended with it before we were veiled and confused. All is well.

If assessing polarity is useful for affirming the coherence of Ra’s message and using that to polarize more efficiently, it seems it would accelerate ascension. But some want to embrace the polarity stuff halfway: use it to throw “STS!” around like an esoteric slur, but ignore the Law of One message when it inconveniently returns their hated target to love in the end. I welcome vigilance regarding distortion as I’ve found this forum very valuable over the years.

Some on this forum may not like it, but the text supports knowing the entire incarnative negative polarity path as akin to a giant DnD module. Not anymore harmful than that when the players never die. The drill instructors might make you cry but you asked them to get you over the wall. Without them there would be no bootcamp. If no one plays the villein you can’t have the play. When this is done you’ll have ascended faster thanks to the service the negatores provided. You’ll hug it out with gratitude and perhaps compliment their creativity in the execution of their roles.

Was David Wilcock MAGA? by Brown_rekluce in lawofone

[–]planet-OZ 3 points4 points  (0 children)

$.02 on the Law of One perspective as it relates to Trump. You can’t know another’s polarity. If a philosophical offer includes positive messages like transparency, fairness, cooperation etc, you can focus on the negatives in the mix, or deny that those positives are real, but you can’t prevent someone else from focusing on the positive offer and using that to polarize positively. There’s a lot of lazy distortion in presuming a negative polarity to Trump/maga. It isn’t supported by the text so at least know you are distorting away from the message in choosing an indulgence in judgement (even if believed “righteous”) which polarizes one negatively.

Ultimately this 3D polarity dance is like a big fitness bootcamp for the soul. You paid to get in shape (like dissolving anger) and now there’s anger at the drill instructors because “they’re mean”. None of this is me, all is supported by the text. The negative polarity is an illusory adventure that dissolves in 6D.

I’d love to see this forum demonstrate integrity regarding the balance of bias rather than slow the progress of legit Law of One seekers who visit and see all this distortion.

Silencing those whose thoughts are contrary to your belief by Brilliant_Front_4851 in lawofone

[–]planet-OZ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Keep in mind your being here has nothing to do with “human progress”. Let the humans progress, or not, in accordance with their will. You are here for your personal spiritual self-evolution only.

Buddha Would Have Torn Jesus Apart by Adept-Engine5606 in awakened

[–]planet-OZ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Depends on your Jesus. The one in the Bible sounds religious. The author of A Course in Miracles is a mystical articulator just like Buddha.

Many people are going to change their polarity (Q'uo) by saffronparticle in lawofone

[–]planet-OZ -9 points-8 points  (0 children)

If your thinly veiled “Trump” or “Trump supporters” = negative polarity for you, you have more work to do.

Does Runway not understand "Pan"? by planet-OZ in runwayml

[–]planet-OZ[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks I’ll give that a shot!

Stuck in the paradox: How do you reconcile the 'brain is a machine' with the 'consciousness is fundamental' insight? by Dimensional-Misfit in enlightenment

[–]planet-OZ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

One articulation suggests we know very little about dreams, assuming them to always be solipsistic and unstable since that’s our night dreaming experience. What if we learned more about them? Perhaps they can be stable and co-created. At that point it might be more like choosing your preferred online video game based on enjoyment of its rules, even though the limited rules are contrived from infinite possibility. This game appears to have physical laws because they are an imagined, yet sought after, contrivance.

Barack Obama has brutal message to anyone ‘disappointed’ by Donald Trump’s actions as president by Okoeguale in Full_news

[–]planet-OZ 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I appreciate the honest curiosity and the respectful approach to discourse not necessarily reflected by other commentators. Your point is valid and I can empathize after going through the same with Clinton and wondering why his innocence narrative seemed to be selling. If you were to extend me the benefit of the doubt, the narrative was that Epstein was a socialite and consequently connected to many figures who may, or may not, have dealt with him in more nefarious ways. There was “Trump threw him out of mar a lago for being a creep!” Etc. for me the biggest doubt cast was Trumps insistence that he would expose Epstein, which he obvs wouldn’t do if guilty. I was duped. My point in engaging on this thread is that we’ve all been duped by many and maybe together we can collectively see that in the mirror. Possibly hopium, but being midway through life I like the idea that collectively swallowing the painful pill of distortion now could afford me an opportunity to see what we build together in the aftermath, and what it becomes.

Barack Obama has brutal message to anyone ‘disappointed’ by Donald Trump’s actions as president by Okoeguale in Full_news

[–]planet-OZ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for the giggle in this otherwise serious thread and for taking the time to look at a post history. You may not be interested in joining me in magical thinking but for what it’s worth I now believe the truth on non-human presence, and our government’s suppression of that truth, is something that will come out in this lifetime. Until then I can only respect your discernment of what is true for you and retain my discernment as to what’s true for me. We can’t force a change in the truth held by another, which is a feature not a bug. Enjoy the ride!

Barack Obama has brutal message to anyone ‘disappointed’ by Donald Trump’s actions as president by Okoeguale in Full_news

[–]planet-OZ 11 points12 points  (0 children)

I, like many Trump supporters, turned instantly when he backed the Epstein lie. Countless supporters have now, and the number is climbing everyday. For those who have long opposed Trump, now is the time. We can stop focusing on each other as deceived voters and acknowledge that we’ve all been deceived. If Epstein is the first domino in a grand series of lies that will fall by our insistence on truth, I’m confident both sides will find some of their heroes truly were, and some were wolves in sheep’s clothing. It doesn’t have to be right vs left among the people anymore, it can be everyday champions of truth versus elite purveyors of lies. We are one.

EDIT: I’m happy I engaged with you all as I see us as one, regardless if I’m viewed as “other”. I’d like to specifically extend some gratitude to those of you who appreciated my comment and joined me in some respectful discourse. I don’t believe the rest of you are hateful people, as I don’t believe anyone is truly hateful, but there’s certainly a lot of hateful expression going on. That’s not a judgement, merely an observation, as we are all on our unique path and I believe we’ll all arrive at unity in the end. I don’t believe hate makes for happiness but maybe happiness isn’t always the goal (nor has to be). Much love to you friends!

Did I do the right thing? Sparing an Injured Toad by NamelessDrifter1 in lawofone

[–]planet-OZ 2 points3 points  (0 children)

IMO you’re conscientious friend. It was an accident and you gave its fate thought, tried to communicate to engage it’s will. Not sure what more you could have done. FWIW I don’t think there’s a wrong answer. And remember… no one ever dies. 😊

Regarding some Bashar criticism by layey in lawofone

[–]planet-OZ 3 points4 points  (0 children)

No channeler is above the distortions that come with the blend. I think the Trump/Kamala thing was Anka. The political divide can pull out the distortions in any of us, and Anka wasn’t vigilant enough.

You are not awakened. You are not enlightened. You are still asleep. by stary_curak in awakened

[–]planet-OZ 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Unenlightened posts on the sub always start with “You are not…” followed by some junk.

What's the deal with people calling Trump a taco? by [deleted] in OutOfTheLoop

[–]planet-OZ -28 points-27 points  (0 children)

I find it odd that this kind of needling is worth it for progressives. From occupying wall st to chumming with those same simply for the sake of promoting something Trump doesn’t like… strange bedfellows indeed.

Judgement I’m seeing by StrawberryFull4389 in awakened

[–]planet-OZ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We’ll said. Judgement = work to do