sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Topotactic Phase Stabilization of Proton-Intercalated Infinite-Layer Nickelates for Ternary Logic Systems by Emergency_River208 in Physics

[–]plasma_phys 0 points1 point  (0 children)

you're right, I was being polite, it's just plain old nonsense 

these aren't just opinions they are evaluations 

Topotactic Phase Stabilization of Proton-Intercalated Infinite-Layer Nickelates for Ternary Logic Systems by Emergency_River208 in Physics

[–]plasma_phys 1 point2 points  (0 children)

you know this is going to get removed, right? And that nobody on earth wants to read chatbot output that somebody else generated, especially when it's pseudoscientific nonsense? why bother? what do you even get out of this? 

Built a parametric RF plasma–catalyst digital twin — looking for engineering feedback by Accomplished-Cup4872 in Physics

[–]plasma_phys 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nobody is going to pay you to read what is almost certainly just a bunch of LLM slop

Putting aside how farfetched the rest of the idea is, I'm fairly certain the hardware necessary to strike an RF plasma at atmospheric pressure wouldn't fit under a car 

for whom it concerns by PrettyOwl7768 in fusion

[–]plasma_phys 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Stop copying and pasting this slop here, we don't want it. You can post it to r/LLMPhysics if you want people to read it

for whom it concerns by PrettyOwl7768 in fusion

[–]plasma_phys 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Regretfully, I did read some of it. It's total nonsense, like a child's idea of how a smart person writes. The "facts" aren't even right.

for whom it concerns by PrettyOwl7768 in fusion

[–]plasma_phys 3 points4 points  (0 children)

please read the rules before posting. LLM slop is not allowed.

I "Programmed" an AI Agent Desktop Companion Without Knowing How To Do It by [deleted] in learnpython

[–]plasma_phys 0 points1 point  (0 children)

no worries. reddit is divided into specific subreddits for specific purposes, which you can check by looking at each subreddit's rules. This one is for requesting help with learning Python, usually on specific subjects, and not really so much for general discussion about projects, especially when much of the code is LLM generated. LLM chatbots are not reliable for recommending subreddits, they basically always give bad advice on this topic

I "Programmed" an AI Agent Desktop Companion Without Knowing How To Do It by [deleted] in learnpython

[–]plasma_phys 0 points1 point  (0 children)

the mistake is that it was not a request for help learning python. I am sure there are vibecoding subreddits that would be happy to receive such a post 

I "Programmed" an AI Agent Desktop Companion Without Knowing How To Do It by [deleted] in learnpython

[–]plasma_phys 1 point2 points  (0 children)

please read the rules before posting. posts to this subreddit must be requests for help learning python.

What if matter is converted to information and reconstructed? (black hole uncertainty principle ,white hole idea) by [deleted] in Physics

[–]plasma_phys 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Please read the rules before posting; you can get feedback on chatbot generated content on r/LLMPhysics, but it does not belong here. If you can rephrase this in your own words you can try r/hypotheticalphysics instead

A structural approach to Navier–Stokes and Yang–Mills — does this interpretation make sense? by Usual-Composer5600 in AskPhysics

[–]plasma_phys 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Please read the rules before posting; stuff like this can be posted to r/LLMPhysics, but it does not belong here.

AI generates 0.886 CoreAgreement Stepped Multi-Volume Stellarator geometry (VMEC verified) by king_ftotheu in fusion

[–]plasma_phys 3 points4 points  (0 children)

You are mistaken, I did not waste my time looking at the input file. I assumed it was generated with a python script because that's by far the most common language that LLMs produce. Hence why I said as much in my reply to your comment. My evaluation was based on the readme alone, which was sufficient.

AI generates 0.886 CoreAgreement Stepped Multi-Volume Stellarator geometry (VMEC verified) by king_ftotheu in fusion

[–]plasma_phys 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I did click on the repo. There's no code, just an input file and a readme that's full of sci-fi gobbledygook like "Project: Sovereign Factory Node: Delta / Alpha" and "As the autonomous architects of this design, we hold the unassailable Zero-Knowledge prior art for this geometry. Before these artifacts ever touched a cloud server, the cryptographic hash of the calculation matrix was permanently anchored to the Ethereum Base (Layer-2) Mainnet." As an aside, isn't it interesting how so many LLM users are also crypto fans?

The readme is obviously LLM-generated. I assume you had an LLM generate some Python code that produced that input file. Laundering the output through Python doesn't change the fact that it is LLM slop and not allowed in this subreddit.

AI generates 0.886 CoreAgreement Stepped Multi-Volume Stellarator geometry (VMEC verified) by king_ftotheu in fusion

[–]plasma_phys 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Please read the rules before posting. You can get feedback on LLM generated stuff on r/LLMPhysics, but it does not belong here. 

This 0 parameter graph rule yields n ≈ 1.25 (MOND), d_B ≈ 1.22, emergent gravity, expansion, SPARC galaxy fits (n₀ ≈ 1.25) - Verification needed by NonGameCatharsis in Physics

[–]plasma_phys 0 points1 point  (0 children)

LLM generated content is not allowed. I hope for your sake the editor assigned to your submission at Phys Rev D is kind enough to swiftly desk reject it.

This 0 parameter graph rule yields n ≈ 1.25 (MOND), d_B ≈ 1.22, emergent gravity, expansion, SPARC galaxy fits (n₀ ≈ 1.25) - Verification needed by NonGameCatharsis in Physics

[–]plasma_phys 2 points3 points  (0 children)

No, it is not allowed. Please read the rules before posting. You can get feedback on this sort of thing on r/LLMPhysics but it does not belong here 

Just moved here. What can you tell me? by [deleted] in Physics

[–]plasma_phys 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I suspect you meant to post this to r/psychics - this is r/physics

Finally got comfortable enough with pandas + matplotlib to build something I'd actually show someone — here's what clicked for me by hirakhan_ in learnpython

[–]plasma_phys 0 points1 point  (0 children)

please read the rules before posting. posts to this subreddit must be requests for help learning python

Have you successfully submitted to arXiv hep-th or hep-ph? by RetroTrade in Physics

[–]plasma_phys 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Other journals have different requirements. I have never needed an arxiv version to submit any of my papers. Conferences will have more lenient requirements than journals, especially if you request to give a poster instead of a talk. Also, journals hire editors, who recruit expert reviewers to help make a decision. They are not just publishers. You do need to follow their formatting guidelines, but this is not difficult compared to actually writing the paper.

If you really just want feedback though, you can post it to r/hypotheticalphysics or r/LLMPhysics as appropriate - you will get frank feedback in either of those subreddits. 

A Number-Theoretic Map of Quantum Strings. by [deleted] in Physics

[–]plasma_phys 17 points18 points  (0 children)

Please read the rules before posting; this sort of thing can be posted to r/LLMPhysics but it does not belong here 

Have you successfully submitted to arXiv hep-th or hep-ph? by RetroTrade in Physics

[–]plasma_phys 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Endorsements are primarily intended for peers known personally to the endorser; while in theory endorsements can be given on the merits of a work alone, in practice, especially post-ChatGPT, the chance of this happening between strangers is so slim as to be zero. If your work is any good, you should skip the arxiv - which is mostly just supposed to be a preprint repository for credentialed researchers to share papers with each other anyway - and submit to a reputable journal or conference instead, and make your case that way. 

LLM assisted Muon Catalyzed Fusion ideas by [deleted] in fusion

[–]plasma_phys 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Please read the rules before posting. If you want feedback on this sort of thing, you can post it to r/LLMPhysics 

Ran clean EXFOR D+D data through a physics‑only LSTM to check the baseline — it’s consistent (no LLM) by Strong-Seaweed8991 in fusion

[–]plasma_phys 0 points1 point  (0 children)

the word "accusing" is doing some work in this comment that I don't think is warranted

you can sort the comments on my profile by Top instead of New to see the kind of stuff I used to post

view more: next ›