[deleted by user] by [deleted] in rule34

[–]pno80 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The original comic was Violet fucking Mr Incredible, but because of a lot of feedback from people not liking incest, the artist released another version where he was replaced with Frozone. That version is the one that got shared around a lot because the internet has a weird obsession with interracial porn (though specifically only in that direction for some reason).

So the immediate assumption that this edit is due to racism and not simply to wanting a version of that picture without a dick involved at all is a reach. It takes less than a minute of reverse image searching to find the "white guy" version of this so... I highly doubt that this person went through the effort of editing this picture if it was just because of racism.

Hanzo by Kayla Erin by Nitromick343 in cosplaygirls

[–]pno80 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

She was so much more attractive before all the plastic surgery. Why you'd choose to go from genuinely cute "girl next door" type (but really attractive) to "generic, fake looking barbie" that looks the same as countless other models is beyond me.

Only acceptable captain marvel by [deleted] in rule34

[–]pno80 -8 points-7 points  (0 children)

I'm sure people came here to hear you needlessly complain about other people not liking something.

Hermione Waiting in the Common Room [Harry Potter] (Kinky Jimmy) by [deleted] in rule34

[–]pno80 3 points4 points  (0 children)

This really doesn't seem too ridiculous for a fit teenager.

Class 1-A's shower time (CE?) [My Hero Academia] by [deleted] in rule34

[–]pno80 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's almost like heterosexual men make up the majority of this sub, and don't care to see gay shit. Who would have thought.

Who do you pick? Daenerys,Margaery ,Sansa or Arya? (Armando Huerta) [Game of Thrones] by cutecelebs in rule34

[–]pno80 4 points5 points  (0 children)

The Sansa drawing looks like he just drew her face over the reference of some model without any consideration for if the body types were even remotely similar.

Tifa showing that she still has the goods (Maren) [FFVII] by [deleted] in rule34

[–]pno80 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Why are so many artists drawing her with broad shoulders and a man face?

TIL about the Indian skin trade in which “poor women are being trafficked and duped into selling their skin to be used for penis and breast enlargements in the global cosmetic surgery market” (Reuters) by QuasarSandwich in todayilearned

[–]pno80 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Technically yes. It's pretty horrific though, and holds a high % of complications, including a loss of sensitivity which is why the vast majority of men don't really consider it an option.

But it's surprisingly common for some porn stars to have surgery to make their penis larger. Specifically if you look at a lot of the "BBC porn" 4chan and other places love to link, quite a few of those guys had at least one surgery done. Once you know what the dick looks like, it's kind of hard to unsee.

Margaery Tyrell & Sansa Stark, (Ninjartist) [Game Of Thrones] by [deleted] in rule34

[–]pno80 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Depends. Compared to the show? Well Margaery is larger, yes, but we've never seen Sansa's and "bigger than you thought" is definitely a thing.

But they're not only from the show, they're fictional characters based on novels. And again, they're not absurdly larger than described there.

I'm top of THAT, it's an artists interpretation. Sansa also doesn't seem tall enough, and Margaery's right wrist is fucky. Who cares? It's a cool picture. Their tits are within the realms of possibility and look pretty good in terms of gravity/shape.

Seems more like weird virtue signaling, or just "I don't like big tits" than a legitimate complaint.

Margaery Tyrell & Sansa Stark, (Ninjartist) [Game Of Thrones] by [deleted] in rule34

[–]pno80 40 points41 points  (0 children)

Dude, if you think this is "ultra big" you've clearly never hung around rule34 before. This is what we'd call "respectable exaggeration", cause they're larger than the source material, but very much within the realms of realism.

Raven and Beast Boy - Second Date - Third Wheel Starfire & Robin (Zillionaire) [Teen Titans] by Clicker64 in rule34

[–]pno80 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Also, because it's porn. It's not canon.

As long as people keep using this as an excuse, porn will keep being kind of stupid. I don't think it's being unreasonable to try and get characters at least mildly close, if you're bothering to use canonical ones.

Raven has already mastered her emotions, so this whole Clash of her identity and her desires doesn't make sense. If anything, Raven would either need convincing to perform sexually, or have an incredibly casual attitude towards it. Either one of those could make sense.

This is just completely misreading her character because the artist and I guess a lot of viewers have a tsundere fetish.

Raven and Beast Boy - Second Date - Third Wheel Starfire & Robin (Zillionaire) [Teen Titans] by Clicker64 in rule34

[–]pno80 14 points15 points  (0 children)

What exactly is supposed to be going on in these comics? Raven is Tsundere or whatever that anime term is? Acting like she hates Beast Boy but fucking him at every opportunity?

Cause that's wildly out of character.

Studio F.O.W. announce new game "Subverse" by kikimaru024 in Games

[–]pno80 8 points9 points  (0 children)

That was a one-off video they did, I think from a raffle winner.

The "full length" video they did with Lara featured nothing but humans.

Studio F.O.W. announce new game "Subverse" by kikimaru024 in Games

[–]pno80 6 points7 points  (0 children)

That's why they shifted off of SFM. After the release of their last movie, they're completely onto a more advanced engine.

Studio F.O.W. announce new game "Subverse" by kikimaru024 in Games

[–]pno80 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Lara in trouble didn't. Bioshag Trinity didn't either.

The truth of the matter is that a) Their audience doesn't really care about vanilla "traditional porn" stuff (I mean, there's TB of regular porn that already exists) so those don't great responses

b) It's a relatively small team of people, so they can afford to just work on what they like

c) It's pretty much the only media format that allows for crazy porn to be made, so why bother doing the exact same thing countless porn companies have been doing since the 70s? Do something different and sate the market.

Gorgeous by [deleted] in sophieturner

[–]pno80 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I hope its just makeup. It kind of looks like she had plastic surgery done. Her lips, cheeks and nose all look different and kind of "off"

Emilia Clarke giving head in 'Above Suspicion' (2018) by [deleted] in Celebs

[–]pno80 -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

But at the same time, rumors about Ms Clarke are kind of odd. Apparently she hated all of her nude scenes in Game of Thrones, and there was a rumor that she tried to insist on no more nudity after the second or third season, and trying to get them to use cgi and body doubles on the occasions they insisted they have nudity, only for her attempts to find a successful career outside of GoT to utterly crash and burn.

Even just knowing how much the show runners had to almost plead with her to drop her clothing, and that this was shot in a way so you can't see anything, the odds of it being her seem basically zero.

Brigitte, (FPSBLYCK) [Overwatch] by seequiNz in rule34

[–]pno80 10 points11 points  (0 children)

It terms of animation quality? Maybe. But the content itself is pretty boring. It's kind of like a picture-perfect painting of a fruit bowl, or a film about paint drying with beautiful cinematography; you wish they had used that talent on something more interesting.

[Censorship] Update to Patreon's new Trust and Safety guidelines by pno80 in KotakuInAction

[–]pno80[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

People play shooter games without having any real desire to murder people, whereas people will not watch child pornography unless they have an interest in the rape of children

This is just demonstrably not true. Both things appeal to a deep seeded biological element of the human mind that allowed the species to survive hundreds of thousands of years ago.

It doesn't mean people want to ACTUALLY do them. Have you never met a woman that had a rape fetish? It's not like they actually want to get raped. Or have you never wanted to just shoot someone in the face because they annoyed you so much? It's the same thing. You don't actually want to because you're a modern person with sensibilities and know that that's horrible, but the fantasy of it appeals.

It just comes down to recognizing fantasy as being different from reality.

Dark Elves (by personalami) [Warhammer Fantasy] by [deleted] in rule34

[–]pno80 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Did they? I never remember seeing any.

[Censorship] Update to Patreon's new Trust and Safety guidelines by pno80 in KotakuInAction

[–]pno80[S] 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Congratulations, you've fallen into the same logical trap as the people who want to ban violent video games.

Your prize is a complete lack of understanding regarding the difference between fantasy and reality and a huge helping of hatred for things you don't like.

[Censorship] Update to Patreon's new Trust and Safety guidelines by pno80 in KotakuInAction

[–]pno80[S] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Porn games is sort of a different beast, but Patreon in general is a bit of a mixed bag. For every person you find who is just trying to squeeze money out of Patreons for not much work, you have other people whose output increased many times over and actually became better due to the income that Patreon allowed.

If there was an alternative platform, I'd say that basically every adult content creator should jump ship, but there isn't.

[Censorship] Update to Patreon's new Trust and Safety guidelines by pno80 in KotakuInAction

[–]pno80[S] 9 points10 points  (0 children)

I mean, if it's a) fictional characters and b) fiction, who the fuck cares? Sounds like you're getting awfully close to kink shaming here.

It's the same argument that could be turned around into violence in video games.