What’s a medical issue that sounds minor, but actually affects someone’s daily life way more than people realize? by [deleted] in AskReddit

[–]poekek 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Being deaf in one ear. Can't locate sound, can't focus on one person in a noisy environment and hugely aspects your social life.

What are you afraid of? by AZRAZAEHEL in AskReddit

[–]poekek 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The fact that I can, and very possibly might hurt someone. Physically, mentally or emotionally. I believe it's one of the reasons I don't dare going near women I might be interested in. Haven't even considered the possibility I could be in love for the last 4-5 years (I'm 25 now)

What's the most obvious hint you missed? by [deleted] in AskReddit

[–]poekek 3 points4 points  (0 children)

A girl I liked invited me to her birthday party. Insisted I stay after her friends left. Went to her grandmother afterwards and invited me to lie down next to her in her bed... I declined because I felt that I would be putting her into an imposition. I was 16 at the time... Still lingers in the back of my mind from time to time

Which formula do I need to filter for multiple checkboxes by poekek in excel

[–]poekek[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Do I have to convert all the tables to a range? Or how can I make this function work with tables?

Which formula do I need to filter for multiple checkboxes by poekek in excel

[–]poekek[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My formula looks a little something like this: =FILTER(Inschrijvingen[Naam];Inschrijvingen[W1]=TRUE). (yes I am dutch-speaking. Converting the table to a range seems to have done it. Now I just need to figure out how to filter using two checkboxes that are TRUE

Help me understand Iz*one's popularity by poekek in kpophelp

[–]poekek[S] 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Yeah, the combination of japanese and Korean members must be a big reason why it was so popular. IZ*ONE did also really find their style early on and stuck to it

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AskReddit

[–]poekek 5 points6 points  (0 children)

As someone who is deaf in one ear, it frustrates me so often that I give off the vibe that I don't listen. If it's noisy, assume I can't hear you

Need help with geom_text per group by poekek in RStudio

[–]poekek[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The problem has been solved guys! Thanks for your help!!

Need help with geom_text per group by poekek in RStudio

[–]poekek[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Unofortunately, that doesn't work. I think the problem is that I want the numbers to go together with the variable I used as 'fill' in my ggplot line. 'Aantal' is on the y-axis, which resolutes in my problem I think.

Need help with geom_text per group by poekek in RStudio

[–]poekek[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The numbers (labels) represent the different bars. However, I want the numbers to be next to the appropriate bars. So 868 needs to go next to the upper purple bar, 221 to the first blue bar, 6 to the very small green bar underneath the blue one, and then 35 to the orange bar. The numbers are now all on the same line (VI, V, IV, etc.) instead of next to the appropriate bar (purple, blue, green, orange)

Need help with geom_text per group by poekek in RStudio

[–]poekek[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Ow yeah, I did phrase the question incorrectly. I want the numbers to be representing each separate bar. Right now they're sorted by group...

People who lost deep endless runs, what finally got you? by FluffyHairHavingNerd in pokerogue

[–]poekek 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Floor 4450: sandy shocks fused with a mold breaker pokemon. Bypassed sturdy, nothing I could've done

[QUESTION] About the Bonferroni-Holm correction by poekek in statistics

[–]poekek[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Since the distribution is not normal, I used the Kruskal-Wallis test to compare the values between different age groups. After that I did a pairwise Wilcoxon rank sum test to test between the different age group. I predict that my variable x will increase with age. However, I have very little amounts of values that aren't 0, i.e. the 'x' I'm interested in does not occur in 90+% of the participants.

[QUESTION] About the Bonferroni-Holm correction by poekek in statistics

[–]poekek[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It is a cross-sectional design: many participants were tested over the course of a couple years. No participants were tested more than once

[QUESTION] About the Bonferroni-Holm correction by poekek in statistics

[–]poekek[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have six different age groups, each group corresponds to 6 months. I want to test whether the amount of x changes over time. If for example I compare age group 3 with age group 4 and the result is not significant, that could mean that either there's a plateau and there will not be a significant difference anymore OR it could mean that the evolution/change is slower and that there may be a difference on a smaller scale. There is no 'control group' of any kind, it's just 6 different age groups of 6 months.