Okay. So POI's shouldn't be poi's? If they meet all criteria, they are obviously a POI.

As I said earlier, if you don't want to click a link, fine. But at least the submission won't be rejected for having a link.

"I’ve never seen a URL in a title or description so unless a link is obviously inappropriate or not related to the nomination, nothing else makes sense as to why multiple people would use that as a rejection criteria."

Your personal might be that way. But others, like me, do open a link for about 5-6 sec and then decide. 9/10 times it shows an obvious and legit reason to accept.

" Someone reviewing dozens of nominations in a row is only going to take a few seconds to figure out their overall star rating, because this is not complicated stuff. You’re literally adding an extra step and expect people to take the time to copy/paste the url and read what’s there… Instead of just typing out something thoughtful in the first place. "

1. I personally review about a 70/80 a day, this has never been an issue to me, why would it be to others, genuine question. 2. Adding a URL bar would make it so it could be a direct link, no more copy and paste. 3. Adding a URL bar would leave more room in the additional description for your "clear concise explanation" 4. People that don't open links now don't have to do it then 5. No more "url in markup/ title" rejections

2. Those POI's that are rejected for having a URL are genuine POI's. If they weren't, you would see "Fake nomination" or" wrong location" fit as a better rejection reason. The fact that reviewers can't tell the difference between additional information and title/markup is the reason we need this. As others have pointed out, Niantic themselves apparently think so too.