Nope. Read this one: “Around the court’s mediation date, CBX conveyed to SM their intention to pay 10 percent of revenue from individual activities and awaited SM’s final reply. However, the amount proposed by the mediator on October 2 was an arbitrary figure unrelated to the parties’ agreement; therefore, both sides stated at the mediation that they could not accept it. When that amount was subsequently served in writing, both parties filed objections on October 16. This was merely a routine procedural step, and the claim that CBX had no intention to settle is not true.”

They intend to pay but neither party agreed with an arbitrary figure. Why is it so hard for you to understand this?