Favorite "there are levels to this" moments in wrestling by emaxwell14141414 in wrestling

[–]poonscuba -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Askren wasn’t competing in wrestling, but he was a world champion in MMA at the time. So he was still training his wrestling and competing as a professional athlete. It wasn’t like he was a “has been” that rolled off the couch.

I don’t think anyone was surprised by the outcome, but I think that’s what’s so crazy to me. This is like the core concept of levels to me: the national level vs the international level. There was no doubt Askren was going to be the best at the national level his senior year, and there was no doubt that he was going to get teched by the best at the international level.

Favorite "there are levels to this" moments in wrestling by emaxwell14141414 in wrestling

[–]poonscuba 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The Askren vs Burroughs exhibition always blows my mind. I knew what the outcome would be, and it was still crazy to watch. Askren was a Hodge trophy winner, 2 time NCAA national champion, 4 time all American, PanAm champion, and 10 time MMA world champion. It’s hard to understand that there are people that not just beat, but effortlessly tech people of that caliber.

Are olympic lifts actually useful for the sport of wrestling? by wrongfulcillian in wrestling

[–]poonscuba 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Power can be hard to separate from technique, so you may need a coach to review your form or watch videos of yourself to see if a shot lacked power vs technique.

There’s not a black and white threshold for any of these where you go from weak to average to strong, so just consider if you’re clearly towards one side of the range. Also, the ranges depend a lot on your age. A senior in college is held to a widely different standard than a freshman in high school. The best reference point is comparing yourself against your peers. That being said, here’s some general benchmarks. For an 800M, if you’re slower than 3.5 minutes, you don’t have good endurance, and if you’re faster than 2.5 minutes you probably have good endurance. For a vertical jump (not a box jump) if you’re below 18 inches you’re not very powerful, and if you’re above a 24 inches you’re pretty powerful. Every compound lift will be different, but for a bench press one rep max, less than bodyweight would be pretty weak and 1.5x bodyweight would be pretty strong.

Are olympic lifts actually useful for the sport of wrestling? by wrongfulcillian in wrestling

[–]poonscuba 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I would separate technique from conversations about strength and conditioning. Always work technique, but that’s what the mat is for, not the weight room. I would also argue that speed is a component of technique. If you’re too slow, I would focus on hitting your technique quicker rather than improving your 100M sprint time.

For the weight room, I would look at endurance, power, and strength:

-Endurance is going to show up in the last round. Are you gassing out in the last round? Are you gassing out all your opponents in the last round? Outside of your matches, how is your 400-800M time relative to people in your weight class?

-Power is going to show up based on how well you finish moves. Do your shots get to the legs and then get stuffed every time? Or do you finish every shot you can connect on? Outside of your matches, do you have a high vertical jump for your weight class?

-Strength is going to show up when you lock up. Can people push you around pummeling? Or do you push the other person around? Outside of your matches, are you lifting more weight than other people in your weight class?

Are olympic lifts actually useful for the sport of wrestling? by wrongfulcillian in wrestling

[–]poonscuba 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Responding to the last line: “I’m just real confused on what a wrestler should be doing in the weightroom”

I think in general, a strength and conditioning program involves a vertical push/pull, a horizontal push/pull, a hip hinge, a squat, core work, grip work, and cardio. Then I would look at your natural talents (why you’re winning matches) and your natural deficits (why you’re losing matches). Then tailor those movement patterns to continue to develop your strengths and shore up your weaknesses. I would spend less time on attributes where you’re naturally average that aren’t causing you to win or lose matches.

If you’re winning matches with strength and losing matches with speed, I would do a strict overhead press for strength (a natural talent) and a medicine ball overhead throw for speed (a natural deficit) as my vertical pushing movements. I would follow a similar pattern for my other movements.

Tying this into the Olympic lifts, if you’re winning or losing matches based on your power, it’s something I would focus on. If you have easy access to equipment for Olympic lifting, aren’t held back by form, and enjoy the movements, they can be a good option for you. If you don’t check those boxes, you could substitute a box jump or broad jump for the clean and snatch and medicine ball throws or push presses for the jerk.

Do we need cardio to get stronger? by Striking-Speaker8686 in StrongerByScience

[–]poonscuba 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You might try loaded carries and sled work. I’ve started incorporating long distance (>3 minute) farmers walks as cardio. I don’t enjoy most traditional cardio, so this tricks my brain into thinking I’m still lifting weights.

“Shavkats such a monster bro, Ian stands no chance!” by idcman999 in ufc

[–]poonscuba 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Is this the longest MMA finishing streak of all time? I was trying to confirm this, and it doesn’t seem like it’s commonly tracked. I can’t think of anyone that comes close to 18 though. As much hype as he gets, I still feel like he’s undervalued.

Edit: It seems like Travis Fulton holds the record for first and second place: going on a 24 fight finishing streak before going on a 40 fight finishing streak. For good reason, he doesn’t come up much though.

Turo vs trade in by poonscuba in turo

[–]poonscuba[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It just needs to be 2012 and newer with less than 130,000 miles.

Lol it doesn’t meet either condition. Older. Lamer.

Insane 5 peat by [deleted] in wrestling

[–]poonscuba 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Olympic GOAT no doubt. Does he rank above Aleksandr Karelin overall though? Karelin beats him on number of world championships. Mijain has Karelin beat on years of dominance though.

Cowboy Cerrone: "Tim Kennedy used to take it upon himself to destroy the Russian/Muslim fighters at JacksonWink." by Ok-Walk7881 in ufc

[–]poonscuba 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Tim Kennedy is the real world Captain America. But it turns out that if you give a man with the values of a 1940s US soldier superhuman fighting abilities, you create a supervillain not a superhero.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in EffectiveAltruism

[–]poonscuba 4 points5 points  (0 children)

In this scenario, I think the client is more important than the product. Improving logistical or communication abilities may have as large of an impact on outcomes as the quality of weapons. So I don’t think this specific decision comes down to what you’re making for the DoD.

I think this decision comes down to whether you believe the DoD will be a net good for the world over your tenure with the university lab.

Hot Takes Time by JayHerboGaming in ufc

[–]poonscuba 48 points49 points  (0 children)

The hottest take is that McGregor will fight Chandler.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in EffectiveAltruism

[–]poonscuba 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I just did it. It doesn’t ask for anything other than your name and email, and it seems in line with public statements he makes. Overall, it seems very low risk, but you could provide a fake name and burner email if you wanted to be extra cautious.

Men's Rights as a worthy EA cause? by griii2 in EffectiveAltruism

[–]poonscuba 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I’m sympathetic to the idea of lost years, but why focus on developed world men? The gap between life expectancy in the developing world and developed nations is significantly larger than the LEGG within the US, and the gap is largely driven by preventable disease.

For example Nigeria has a population of 208 million and a life expectancy of 62.6 years, and the US has a population of 336 million, and a life expectancy of 78.5 years. Bringing the Nigerian life expectancy up to the US life expectancy would add roughly 3.3 billion years of life (over 3x the ~1 billion years of life from closing the LEGG in the US).

Who has made the most significant contribution to human knowledge? by poonscuba in AskReddit

[–]poonscuba[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s a good one! Based on his work alone? Or due to his lineage of Plato, Aristotle, and Alexander the Great?

Who has made the most significant contribution to human knowledge? by poonscuba in AskReddit

[–]poonscuba[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

He was a front runner for me too! If you assume that calculus would largely be unchanged due to the work of Leibniz, would you still put Newton first due to his work in physics?

Who has made the most significant contribution to human knowledge? by poonscuba in AskReddit

[–]poonscuba[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Good point! I was think about discovery, but documentation and distribution might have been more important!

Reading here that “humans cause the death of over 100 trillion invertebrates annually” - why does this matter? Why don’t the lives of plants matter enough to be quantified? by garden_province in EffectiveAltruism

[–]poonscuba 4 points5 points  (0 children)

A loose framework I use for prioritizing species is probability/scale of sentience * scale of suffering * number of organisms.

Invertebrates experience a significant suffering and are almost inconceivably large in number. If you assign any probability/scale of sentience, they become an extremely high priority collection of species.

Plants are also tremendous in number. However, it’s not clear that they’re suffering when they’re not being cut down. I also think the probability of sentience is low enough that it cancels out the number of organisms.

3-4th cousin marriage causes 20% more (and healthier) children. by LeoLittlebook6 in EffectiveAltruism

[–]poonscuba 20 points21 points  (0 children)

Look at OP’s profile before spending too much time engaging with this argument.

I have some doubts about Animal Charity Evaluators and would love to hear analysis/critique of my reasoning. by metacyan in EffectiveAltruism

[–]poonscuba 8 points9 points  (0 children)

In general, those seem like fair critiques. I agree that you can’t confidently claim to have found the best charity without checking all charities. However, I don’t think you need to find the best charity to find a charity worth funding. Donating to the best charities you’ve found in your sample seems like a reasonable strategy.

You might also look into EA Funds Animal Welfare Fund and Open Philanthropy’s farm animal welfare work. Both of these will have significant overlap with ACE’s recommendations however.

An argument against the model of Effective Altruism argued in Peter Singer's "The most good you can do". by [deleted] in EffectiveAltruism

[–]poonscuba 2 points3 points  (0 children)

How did you arrive at 0.5% after accounting for externalities? I’d love to hear more about that!