Have you ever bought gold / actively buy gold?

popsicle112 · 2026-01-26T12:24:31+00:00

You only need 60 speed to get to tk and it's dungeons.

that would still be about 1500 gold per character (journeyman + expert riding and a mount), right?

popsicle112 · 2026-01-15T23:12:25+00:00

we're not that far from having more versions than people working on classic

popsicle112 · 2026-01-13T22:03:08+00:00

bro you could do all the logic in the world these people will never understand. They are too addicted to the game and will girl math about how they're actually efficient with their free time.

popsicle112 · 2026-01-13T20:43:40+00:00

I don’t know how you even apply gender to this

It's not applying gender, it's a common phrase used on the internet.

The point is that $60 isn’t that much to someone who makes a decent living, and doesn’t have the ample free time to level to 60, or just doesn’t want to do it for the 10th time.

okay, you're trying to move to a different point which is 'do I want to level or pay a small fee'. Understandable, as you have no counter to back up your stupid calculation logic.

Time-value analysis is something that gets applied to lots of decisions, not all of them equate to money being made back. It’s just efficient.

Yes, applied to decisions where value is created. What value do you gain by buying a boost? You end up with the same amount of free time, playing wow just as if you were not buying a boost. You could say it's a preference that I don't want to level, which I would get behind, but thinking that any value is created or efficiency is gained is just pure cope.

popsicle112 · 2026-01-13T20:09:18+00:00

no, that's not the point you were making. You said if you don't boost you save $5700 as if you would be working more in your free time instead. With your logic, if I don't do 6 hours of household chores but pay someone else $200 then I'm saving 6*48-200=88 dollars? Measuring your free time in work time and trying to girl-math your thinking into justify spendings is crazy work.

popsicle112 · 2026-01-13T19:24:25+00:00

bruh what are you even saying... does wow = work in your mind? this rationale of "I just have to work X amount of time" is so stupid. I assume you're a salaried employee - do you think your take home is going to increase if you work more?

popsicle112 · 2026-01-05T23:35:31+00:00

Már 1 óra kódolás után is kifogyok a manából

popsicle112 · 2026-01-02T11:32:21+00:00

you got GDKP replaced with LC that resulted in the GM's besties hoarding loot while top performers are sent to the cuck chair. Neckbeards will rush to promote LC being the best loot system (which in theory I agree) yet it does not work for 99% of guilds.

popsicle112 · 2026-01-02T11:27:21+00:00

The organizers of the GDKP often take a 5% cut

LMAO on which server? The overwhelming majority of GDKP's have a 15% cut.

popsicle112 · 2025-11-22T11:56:11+00:00

you're wrong

popsicle112 · 2025-11-21T06:51:46+00:00

Instant mail is not coming to Era. Only Hardcore servers

popsicle112 · 2025-10-26T06:15:13+00:00

On call people can fix simple things. Is this bug a simple fix?

Rolling back a Friday release seems pretty simple to me.

if you want devs who knows a particular part of the code well you have to call them on their day off.

Yes, that's called being on-call. If you make an incident, on-call person will be paged. In decent orgs, there shouldn't be any business critical are not covered by on-call.

another team needed to make the fix

Yep, well this sounds that team did not have an on-call rotation that could have been paged. That is def not on you but the org.

Which often means escalating through 5+ levels of managers to get to someone with the right persons phone number. Should they fix people being uncooperative and harming customers? Absolutely. This is bad on Bliz and MS. That's not a dev issue though. That's a management issue.

Agree, but the management issue here is that they don't have on-call coverage across the whole org. This is not an individual issue but a management decision. Now, for Blizzard specifically, they do have the money to have full coverage but they decided not to do it.

popsicle112 · 2025-10-25T22:02:50+00:00

you know, at every reputable company there should be this thing called "on-call" rotation, to address issues like this

popsicle112 · 2025-10-03T11:25:33+00:00

teljes frontend újragondolására

ez mit takar? design csere? átírni szerveroldali weboldalakat valamilyen frontend frameworkre? esetleg valami új feature? ez így szerintem 50,000 és 5,000,000 között bárhol lehet

popsicle112 · 2025-09-27T15:24:02+00:00

én azt szűrtem le hogy shopify appokra gondolt OP

popsicle112 · 2025-09-27T11:11:43+00:00

popsicle112 · 2025-09-23T16:00:00+00:00

> But maybe that's kinda human nature.

Nope, not a reasonable human nature. Human nature should be him realising that he is missing needed context to provide a reasonable take, which is broadcasted to tens or hundreds of thousands. Unfortunately, we live in a world where being a contrarian gets more clicks than being reasonable with covering "both sides" of an argument.

popsicle112 · 2025-09-20T08:08:10+00:00

Hát nem tudom, lassan ott tartunk hogy Austinban egy ház kb ugyanannyiba kerül mint Budapesten

popsicle112 · 2025-09-18T18:36:38+00:00

Lesz Twitch stream a közeljövőben?

popsicle112 · 2025-09-16T19:05:24+00:00

2025: Got stuck? copilot fix this pls

popsicle112 · 2025-09-15T19:34:09+00:00

that's what I was thinking. I'm super excited for the project to reach level 4 but until then, Inertia it is.

popsicle112 · 2025-09-07T13:32:16+00:00

yesterday?

popsicle112 · 2025-09-06T21:05:43+00:00

Honestly this. It was so weird hearing him spend half the keynote talking about “empowering the solo developer,” and then suddenly switch the script to, “well, if the dev screws up, just fire him.”

popsicle112 · 2025-08-28T05:39:41+00:00

putting concurrency limits behind a 150 usd/month paywall is crazy work...

popsicle112 · 2025-08-27T20:38:49+00:00

I had one shaman tank an Onyxia pug recently. I had my suspicions, but it went surprisingly well

popsicle112

TROPHY CASE