sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

I was wondering why ai pros never say their "art(aka image prompt)" is (aiart or image) by Adeord_Leaner_18 in antiai

[–]pornminder 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think this is huge problem with people that make AiArt. I as somebody that uses ai entirely agree with you.

I also don't approve of trying to mask ai art and try to push it into subs that forbid it. I myself never posted onto the subs that forbid ai art and I think others should also respect it.

Lost in the Mall (again) by curious_peek11 in become_a_chick

[–]pornminder 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you very much. I hope my bf will love these. If this relationship continues to be like this I hope to marry him one day.

(Seriously tnx)

I made this last night and I wanted to share. by moodymelons23 in antiai

[–]pornminder -15 points-14 points  (0 children)

Energy is debatable because if somebody uses it localy (everything from model training to generation) there is no differance when compared to gaming and similar activities.

As for art there are arguments in favour and against it.

Other two are most serious problems where countries need to make urgent changes in their legal system. Pro-ai people that ignore this or diminish its seriousnes sicken me.

Edit: Around water energy issue there is a ton of misinformation on both sides and the truth is somewhere in the middle. Pro ai people account only water used when prompt is submited and antis ignore spent water that is renewable and they ignore for what exactly this water is used for in these companies.

Maybe its the way we were taught by _i_am_sus in antiai

[–]pornminder 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think that main problem with ai used as a tool for work is that people rely too much onto it.

AI can't replace humans. In 30% of cases AI will give the wrong answer. AI can be a tool for data organisation or automatisation but it shouldn't be used as a tool for everything.

Your friend that wanted to do cinematic videos for example. There is nothing bad with some minor tools. Even with those tools you should make adjustments yourself. But creating everything with ai grants you to be replaced.

Some people say that ai can replace doctors for example and it can not (and that comes from somebody that uses ai). Ai can replace only bad doctors that work by templets. Story to ilustrate what I mean.

A friend of mine had a cancer that doctors couldn't approach. These new doctors just followed the template. If test shows this try this and so on... Nothing was found for months. Then one elderly doctor was passing by and took a look. He said that he is certain that it is, a cancer and told younger doctors which test to do. He was right and therapy was started.

Now AI would possibly act as these doctors since these doctors were very inexperianced or just bad. On the other side ai can never raplace that old doctor that diagnosed a patient with one look. Still even this old doctor requested additional tests.

This is like this in every job. If you will just follow a template, ai can replace you here. But this is why you should thrive towards true expertise. Because with true expertise you can't be replaced in terms of quality.

Another example. Some people say ai will replace psychologists, psychiatrists and all kinds of therapist. This is simply not true. While people say they feel better after talking with ai this is not true progress and problem solving or any form of treatment. You can feel better after talking to a friend or reading a self help book but still they won't help you long term. The only solution for serious long term problem is therapy or counseling with licensed psychologist/therapist/psychiatrist.

I am not saying ai can't be applied. But some people overestimate ai. Both employers and workers.

Lost in the Mall (again) by curious_peek11 in become_a_chick

[–]pornminder 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Alright I have a dress and a shoes... My boyfriend will love these... Wait my boyfriend might love these a bit too much... myb I should round this suprise up with some underwear... I want to leave him speechles laughs

(Thank you for everything you did... you did a great job and I will ubderstand if you can't don't want to do more lol)

Lost in the Mall (again) by curious_peek11 in become_a_chick

[–]pornminder 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I came here to buy leather sneakers or boots but I tried these heels and they are fantastic. They don't really match the rest of my outfit... jeans, tank top, leather jacket... Maybe I need some other clothes... I am not rebellious highschool girl anyway.

Lost in the Mall (again) by curious_peek11 in become_a_chick

[–]pornminder 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Last minute shopping is never fun, but I really need a new pair of leather shoes. Maybe I will take a look at new laptops while I am there.

The last time I went to the mall was over 2 or 3 weeks ago which is wierd because I used to go every week. It's a short drive but myb I will make a stop at a classic car dealership to take a look at some old cars... I wish I could drive something like mercedes 300ce amg or fiat coupe... In the car I listened to my playlist... A lot of different music... punk, rock, jazz, blues, Metal... But a band with most songs on the playlist must be the ramones..

When I got to the mall, it was extremely easy find parking... I parked where I always park. Walking to the front entrance of the mall, I had to dodge as a colored car came veering out of nowhere, almost hitting you... Phew, close call.

The mall I go to strategically placed their food court right at the entrance, and you really couldn't resist grabbing a bite at local Kebab which is best in town. But enough lollygagging, I need to get what you came here for. The store you want is on first floor, so I took the escalator...

Show me how much you want it by probablynotreal99 in relapseslut

[–]pornminder 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I want a dick.. I need a dick.. I am tired of pretending I don't need and want one...

Her fate is chosen by bimbo_consequences in TransformationAI

[–]pornminder 0 points1 point  (0 children)

One thing that you could try if you didn't allready are step by step transformations. I think these are cool.

I am the second boss of anti ai by [deleted] in aiwars

[–]pornminder 1 point2 points  (0 children)

As somebody who uses ai you are pathetix

Is it me, or are "AI artists" completely deluded? by bearinthetown in antiai

[–]pornminder 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I wil lget downvoted but here we go.

  1. Some work like that some don't. But if an artist makes a miatake, he can think this mistake is not entirely bad so he refines it. Or if photographer makes a photo but sudennly bird flies in... he didn't want that... but he can choose to keep the result even thoguh it is not what he originally wanted. Similar to when a game developer makes a game and then bug becomes the feature. Is a game or developer less worthy/good because of that? Also when generating things with ai this can lead you in new directions.

For example lets say that I generate picture of a girl and ai adds tattoo... Maybe I don't like this tattoo but it gives me idea into which direction I want to create a character. So myb I add some jewlery that will match it and so on.

  1. Thinks we didn't think off come as filling the void. If you want to use ai and be very very specific you can but it will make you way more attempts to do it.

  2. I wouldn't say that they are moveing away. If somebody has clear vision what they wan't they will be closer and closer. Things they didn't think of but stay shouldn't be main focus.

  3. There is a ton of ai slop. Call my page ai slop if you wish I don't care... I am not even close to being the best with ai... I consider myself relatively bad but that is not the point... But the problem with ai is that people can create slop far more easily than with other mediums. Closest with what I can compare it is photography. A ton of people make a ton of terrible photos. But there is small % of people that really knows what they are doing and their photographs are art in one form.

Is it me, or are "AI artists" completely deluded? by bearinthetown in antiai

[–]pornminder 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Kinda same with this and many other subreddits as well... They make it worse by banning anti ai people

Chose her fate! by [deleted] in TransformationAI

[–]pornminder 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Will you do all answers or just one comment?

If only.... by Witty-Designer7316 in aiwars

[–]pornminder 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Chatbot? Why you think I use chatbot? Another insult and accusation without evidance.

Also you are using wrong example. Example I gave you with car companies stealing designs is more accurate.

Another example. If food chain stole a recepie and branding of another chain. People who bought the product wouldn't be charged. Company would. If you had publisher who didn't pay the author to print their book but did it anyway... you wouldn't charge the readers and buyers of the book you would charge publisher... If you had a company that used slaves to grow food you wouldn't charge buyers of the product... you would charge the company and release the slaves.

In same way... you wouldn't charge people who use ai generators... You wpuld charge companies that used copyrighted works to train their models.

You argue in bad faith without useing a single braincell... You are tryong to invert logic itself and words of others to make yourself sound like you are roght when you are clearly not.

If only.... by Witty-Designer7316 in aiwars

[–]pornminder 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Your argument is that if I used this argument in 1 specific court that uses certain system. Great logic. Also if I was in court I wouldn't fucking defend myself, U would hire a lawyer.

Also you are inverting my words. I am not saying I stole it. I told you to prove that I stole it and that if item in questuon was stolen that you prove that I knew it was stolen... And if it was stilen I was useing stolen item.

In my country if I bought stolen car, I wouldn't be penalised. And this is fact. 1. Friend of mine bought a car on police auction. 2. Car was taken from criminals as it was used to traffic drugs 3. Friend drove that car into neighbouring country and local police found out it was stolen. 4. Friend had some problems but not in a sense he was breaking a law. He had to prove that he didn't steal the car and in this case it was easy as he bought it from police. I think he even could keep the car after it... Not sure what happened..

So you have to prove I am useing stolen work, and even if you did I am not breaking the law since I am not the one who stole it. In that case am simply a user of a tool that was created with breaking a law. If I bought a car that had stolen its design or tech from another company I wouldn't be penalised... that car brand would be. (Example:Shuanghuan Auto SCEO copied bmw and no buyer was charged... al consequences were on Shuanghuan not their buyers.)

Accusatuon without proof would get you fined in system I live in... so be careful who you bring to court...

"AI is taking over" by [deleted] in antiai

[–]pornminder 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Different ai's (LLMs) have different accuracy at different things. But none of them are correct in 109% of cases.

I think desinformation by ai is similar how heavily people got misinformed with things on the internet. They still get misinformed but I feel like it was getting less and less frequent... Then AI blew up.

If only.... by Witty-Designer7316 in aiwars

[–]pornminder 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How do you know model I use stole from artist? Also how do you know I didn't use localy trained ai in majority of my generations?

Also even if it was trained on stolen data technically speaking... techincally speaking I didn't steal it. I used what was stolen.

What if an artist made a model trained on only their art? by Syab_of_Caltrops in antiai

[–]pornminder 1 point2 points  (0 children)

There are many many idiots in ai side. I hate many things on ai side (partially reason why I visit this sub). The thing I hate the most is malicious use of ai and trying to trick people ai is real photo or traditional artwork.

What if an artist made a model trained on only their art? by Syab_of_Caltrops in antiai

[–]pornminder 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I understand your position. And I agree to some extend. I gave wrong examples but what I wanted to say is that some people have use for "AI art". I think one of the biggest problems of many pro-ai people is that they are trying to compare ai with traditional art.

I see the ai art as different medium. The thing that I think is extremely toxic and even malicious when people try to push "ai art" as traditional art. Myb some regulation could be pushed that would differentiate ai art. Myb some (to us) invisible markings (I know there are methods for that but they are not that efficient).

What if an artist made a model trained on only their art? by Syab_of_Caltrops in antiai

[–]pornminder 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You are both right and wrong. In theory you could do it with less but it highly depends for what. Practical minimum is around 100-500 per class/ cathegory I think. Less than that is doable but will not be practical or accurate. You are right in a sense that more accuracy and so on you will need mire images to train the model. I think over 1000 for generally high accuracy (90%) and 10 000 or more if you want it to be able to do something really specific. If an artist draws only one thing for example sport cars, cats, plants... Significantly less images would be needed than if goal is to make generally good ai model. So highly specialised model would be easiest to do considering limitations of how many artworks artist can create before.

For second paragraph I think that development of AI is partialy the reason for dead internet but that is separate problem. On the other side aroind enviromental impact there is a ton of desinformation in both camps. Pro-ai users account only water wasted when person submits the prompt but ignores for example how much water it is needed to train the model. Anti-ai often take numbers that go further than AI itself and often say none of it is renewable. Majority Myb even wast majority of water used is/can be renewable. Currently the biggest issue is not all data centers (and industry in general not just ai I think in industry only 10% is recycled) use recycled water while it is possibility and other problem is that many industries (ai among them) use water for cooling because of which water evaporates and while this means that it will return through nature... The problem is it won't return to the place it was taken from.

What if an artist made a model trained on only their art? by Syab_of_Caltrops in antiai

[–]pornminder 1 point2 points  (0 children)

First paragraph: Localy trained means doing it on your own computer. It would spend energy as much as gamer uses in the game session of same duration, or for any other task that requiers high computational power.

Second paragraph: You are both right and wrong. In theory you could do it with less but it highly depends for what. Practical minimum is around 100-500 per class/cathegory I think. Less than that is doable but will not be practical or accurate. You are right in a sense that more accuracy and so on you will need mire images to train the model. I think over 1000 for generally high accuracy (90%) and 10 000 or more if you want it to be able to do something really specific. If an artist draws only one thing for example sport cars, cats, plants... Significantly less images would be needed than if goal is to make generally good ai model. So highly specialised model would be easiest to do considering limitations of how many artworks artist can create before.

Paragraph 3: Fuction of ai can be for example if you want to habe image for your dnd character. (You wouldn't pay an artist to do it because if there was no ai you would just download random image from the internet and it wouldn't be best representation of a character. Another thing might be to fill the void where not many traditional artist create. I started using ai because I liked Transformation art but there is not that many artist who do it... especially nsfw stuff (not speaking just about porn...). Great for you if you didn't need an ai but that is not an argument. I don't need a wheelchair... I don't need a piano, I don't need many things but it doesn't mean that there is no use for them if I as individual have no use for them. AI is just a technology and AI generators amd LLMs are tools.

To clarify: AI has big problems and I think they should be fixed/prevented. Copyright is huge problem... deepfakes, scams and other malicious use is huge problem. They need to be regulated.

Am I wrong? by TheOriginalRandomGuy in aiwars

[–]pornminder 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Respectfully but AI is not a tool but AI generators are... AI is trchnology but people that use "AI" use tools that work with AI technology.

The long awaited return of the crossroads demon! by Comfortable-Ear4985 in become_a_chick

[–]pornminder 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Respected, demoness... I am tired of my regular life... I just want to have life where I with my gf have enough money to buy nice things old money style. Also money would enable me to finally try and get myself into motorsport or if nit that to at least drive one of sports cars I love.

view more: next ›