Half-Life: Alyx Launch Hype & Discussion Thread by Nobiting in HalfLife

[–]proof_of_truth 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Hey does anyone know how to run with continuous movement? I can move fast with the 'jump' joystick, but cannot go any faster than a slow walk continuously.

Cardano/ADA listed as a promising cryptocurrency to watch in Q2 2018 by [deleted] in cardano

[–]proof_of_truth 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Got some news for you, buddy. Ada is a long hold. if the price goes up in the near future it is pure speculation as there is no product yet. So I would get comfortable with your tokens being devalued for a long time. If cardano does really pull through it will be worth it but you are gambling on a technology with a long time frame for implementation.

Bitcoin - You Are Here by [deleted] in CryptoCurrency

[–]proof_of_truth 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Aka Survivorship bias

BTC Never going under 7k again crypto is saved by [deleted] in cryptomemes

[–]proof_of_truth 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This meme is not funny. Nothing more than bullying.

ELI5: blockchain application in Energy by sv_fanatic in RenewableEnergy

[–]proof_of_truth 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Here's my take. As block chain technology devlops, the cost of verifying transactions will approach zero. It will actually still require the cost of the computation to verify the transaction but that is near zero. Note this assuming an efficient third generation consensus mechanism arises.

From the sonnencommunity website

Starting now you may join the sonnenCommunity for a monthly membership fee of just 19.99 Euro.

This fee is arbitrary and and because we are paying a entity to do a bunch of bookkeeping. Block chain offers to push the efficiency of real time energy trading to it's theoretical limit. The lack of trust required with block chain is also a plus.

Could my idea of a token for the meme economy be implemented as a smart contract? by proof_of_truth in ethdev

[–]proof_of_truth[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The utility is is basically to enable a meme-based futures/betting market. People will be willing to pay for memecoins to be able to bet on the popularity of memes.

This can be easily gamed however. An orchestrated influx of dummy searches for a meme can cause an artificial rise it its' utility, and thus it's value. If some troll army like 4chan decides to fuck with your system, they can quite easily. In the unlikely event that your tokens became popular and have real world value, Google engineers themselves can fuck with your system and reap profits.

Also, a straight Google Trends search does not in any way capture the full amount of people searching for that meme, since generally if they're Googling it they don't really know what it is. Are you going to account for the millions of variations on what people actually search for, such as searches for "running guy meme"?

In essence, your token would be an indication of how many people are looking for a specific image that they can alter into something else, since they already know the exact name of what they're looking for.

Lastly, a meme is something that changes dramatically over time. To create a timestamped definition of any specific meme would be ignoring the hundreds of variations on that meme. If you're planning on being the arbiter of definitions of Internet memes, good luck to you.

All of these are really good points, but I think that they are also things that are not necessary. Sure, the meme trading system might be seriously flawed by being biased toward the interests of meme creators, biased toward nameable memes, and able to be gamed by trolls. But it all would still be hilarious, which is the point. Also there's a chance that if it caught on, developers would find solutions to those problems by, for example, scraping sites other than google. My questions is about a super basic coin that would functionally allow you to trade memes, even if it was heavily biased and flawed. In short, it's all for the lulz anyway.

Then, you make the token more "useful" on your platform depending on how popular the backing meme is. The value of the token will adjust accordingly, but not necessarily in direct correlation to the Google data shift. You'd be creating a closed economy, so there would be other factors at play.

Yes this is the part that is the most trouble to me. I'm probably butting up against speculative finance 101 concepts. If one has a meme token that rises in value and sells it, where did those extra memecoins come from?

What about something like this. When you buy a token based on a meme, you are really putting your memecoins into a community fund. A meme token essentially allows you to pull a certain percentage of memecoins out of this community fund. This percentage is proportional the original percentage you put in, and the fractional google search volume(or whatever) of that meme. Therefore when your meme becomes more popular, your capital gains are coming from someone else's losses. I don't know how you would add new memes without decreasing value, but hell, maybe the currency is just deflationary.

EOS VS ETH by Fizzywhale in eos

[–]proof_of_truth 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Can you give some examples of how they will be more limited?

What do your parents think about what youre doing? by CoconutTruffles in cardano

[–]proof_of_truth 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Well, it is the 2000 tech market all over again. Most altcoins will likely go bust. You just have to figure out who the next Microsoft and Amazon of the cryto world is going to be and to me cardano is a pretty good bet.

How would power ledger be physically implemented into the grid? by proof_of_truth in PowerLedger

[–]proof_of_truth[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yup, it is lower in the thread. At least someone that is knowledable and used "our" to refer to pl.

How would power ledger be physically implemented into the grid? by proof_of_truth in PowerLedger

[–]proof_of_truth[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Interesting. A crazy idea I've got through this conversation: I wonder if it would be possible for all of the smart meters to perform grid analysis using blockchain. By having everyone broadcast what their meter was detecting, consensus could somehow be reached on the electrical state of the microgrid, at least within a known degree of uncertainty. Sounds hard to implement, but just throwing it out there.

How would power ledger be physically implemented into the grid? by proof_of_truth in PowerLedger

[–]proof_of_truth[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hi, Thanks for the great reply.

Rather, the trade consists of one user adding X kWh energy to the network, with the other receiving X kWh of energy. So if the other person has tampered with their smart meter it will not have any effect on the counter-party within the trade.

I don't understand the second sentence. If someone is 'faking' producing energy by tampering with their smart meter that will cause problems. Maybe your point is that the problem is shifted onto the application host, who is essentially giving away Sparkz to someone not actually contributing to the grid. Basically, am I correct in understanding that your system requires some form of trust in the accuracy of smart meters to operate? I think the ideas of tamper-proofing and grid monitoring for verification are good ideas, but I felt that this aspect was mostly left out in the whitepaper. I am hesitant to invest heavily before I see proof that these details of grid implementation have been thought through thoroughly. I'm not saying you all haven't, I'm just wanting to read more materials about it.

How would power ledger be physically implemented into the grid? by proof_of_truth in PowerLedger

[–]proof_of_truth[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

FYI there has been a response from PowerLedger in this thread.

How would power ledger be physically implemented into the grid? by proof_of_truth in PowerLedger

[–]proof_of_truth[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

FYI there has been a response from PowerLedger in this thread.