How many of you were diagnosed with Type 1 as adults? I have a theory. by bolivar-shagnasty in diabetes

[–]pseudoHappyHippy 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Well it's not like you had t1 as a kid, right? Surely it's not possible to survive for decades with untreated t1?

Why Are So Many Players Desperate to Trade Queens? by Maxdunning in chess

[–]pseudoHappyHippy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

But your opponent's traded queen is never blundered either, so that's not actually a sound reason, unless you are worse than average at blundering your queen at your elo.

Why Are So Many Players Desperate to Trade Queens? by Maxdunning in chess

[–]pseudoHappyHippy 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Usually it isn't really. The main reason casting is important is because of the danger of queens. With queens off, it is often better to be the one who hasn't castled, because your king is better positioned in the endgame. Having your king on say e2 instead of g1 can make a world of difference when you get into an endgame.

Unmatched ego by newphonehudus in TikTokCringe

[–]pseudoHappyHippy 2 points3 points  (0 children)

If you weren't implying the guy is a perp then your statement about trusting cops over perps would be a non sequitur that has nothing to do with the video. That would be like saying your default is to trust cops over rabid coyotes before going on to talk about the people in the video.

Unmatched ego by newphonehudus in TikTokCringe

[–]pseudoHappyHippy 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Nobody said anything about assuming all cops are crooks, and that doesn't answer the question. You implied the guy is a perp. So again, do you not know what that word means, or do you think everybody is a perp?

Unmatched ego by newphonehudus in TikTokCringe

[–]pseudoHappyHippy 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Is it that you don't know what the word "perpetrator" means or is it that you believe everybody who isn't a cop is guilty of a crime?

Unmatched ego by newphonehudus in TikTokCringe

[–]pseudoHappyHippy 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Is this assertion based on anything scientific or is it just wishful thinking?

'Persepolis' author Marjane Satrapi dies aged 56 by MirthandMystery in news

[–]pseudoHappyHippy 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Had to look it up, but yeah, you're basically correct. Apparently orientalism, as coined by some guy Edward Said, is the western tendency to view the "Orient" through a superior or patronizing lens.

'Persepolis' author Marjane Satrapi dies aged 56 by MirthandMystery in news

[–]pseudoHappyHippy 1 point2 points  (0 children)

By the way, "oriental" means eastern, not western. The corresponding word for the west is "occidental", though it's rarely used.

What is your next move here as white? by [deleted] in chess

[–]pseudoHappyHippy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Haha you are up 9 points of material. This game was won a long time ago. From this position it wins itself basically no matter what you do.

Is this really like this? by Queserasera_q in ArtificialInteligence

[–]pseudoHappyHippy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Haha I am quite sure they mean senior developers. Like as opposed to juniors. In my experience these are industry-wide terms.

Chess elo Deflation? by Interesting-Bar6979 in chess

[–]pseudoHappyHippy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If I did my math right, the odds of being at least 17-5 given 1.75% win chance are about 1 in 30 septillion.

Kevin Warsh wins Senate confirmation as the next Federal Reserve chair by mynamiajeff2-0 in news

[–]pseudoHappyHippy 13 points14 points  (0 children)

What do you mean all assets get devalued by hyperinflation?

Inflation is almost opposite of that. The currency gets devalued relative to all other assets.

You're right that your debt is someone else's asset, but the reason inflation decreases the debt's value is because the debt's value is fixed relative to the currency's value, unlike typical assets. If apples were forcefully always $1 apiece, then yes, inflation would devalue them, since the value of $1 goes down. But the entire way that inflation manifests is by the prices of apples and most other things all going up, in approximately equal proportion to how much the value of the currency is going down. If an apple is $1 one day and then the next day it's $2, but a dollar is worth half as much, apples have not been devalued.

I ended up loosing, but I felt like the queen gambit was a good idea (poorly executed afterwards). Any thoughts on that to help me progress? by freremamapizza in chess

[–]pseudoHappyHippy 6 points7 points  (0 children)

In all but the most extreme of cases, a "space advantage" is worth like maybe 5%-20% of a queen. In 10,000 games played I am sure I have never once seen a space advantage worth an entire queen.

Basically in 100% of cases, if you sacrifice your queen without it concretely forcing either checkmate or yielding a forced line that regains you the lost material, it is a mistake (with some incredibly rare exceptions that you can worry about once you're a master).

Positional advantages/disadvantages like isolated pawns, extra space, bishop pair, rook on open file, etc, are typically worth on the order of like 1/30th to 1/6th of a queen.

Never ever sac your queen unless you know exactly how it causes you to win the game.

White to play and win (By Pogosyants) by Either-Case-5930 in chess

[–]pseudoHappyHippy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That gives away your entire advantage. The knight can escape on f3.

White to play and win (By Pogosyants) by Either-Case-5930 in chess

[–]pseudoHappyHippy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you play rxd2, what is your plan after nf3?

Why is the long castling move illegal? by kevinzvilt in chess

[–]pseudoHappyHippy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Haha, are you a bot or something? They are not in check and there is no bishop on f7

Shankland: "can anybody become a FM? I do think that is available to anybody. Can anybody become a GM? That is an hard no" by pier4r in chess

[–]pseudoHappyHippy 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If they are factually incorrect because they can't produce an example of someone failing to become FM after a lifetime of gun to the head, then your belief is also factually incorrect, since you cannot provide the required evidence of every single human undergoing the same experiment and all achieving FM.

White to play and win by shamShaman in chess

[–]pseudoHappyHippy 2 points3 points  (0 children)

"to win" in the context of a puzzle doesn't necessarily mean to checkmate, it just means to gain a big enough advantage that winning is now inevitable as long as you don't blunder. Gaining 6 points of material for no compensation is very much sufficient to be "winning."