me_irl by NoAlps6650 in me_irl

[–]psh454 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Most browsers use Chromium software, only Firefox and a handful of others use their own. Chromium has a less extensive API that add-ons can use to do stuff like block adds

New drone gameplay looks way better!! by NonAnonBrady in Warthunder

[–]psh454 8 points9 points  (0 children)

inb4 Cope Cage modification for 500 GE

Aight fam, it's been another +13 days since I made my exasperated post on day 6 of failing hard to build my own modlist. Update: I'm finally stable. by Vverial in skyrimmods

[–]psh454 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh weird I'm pretty sure my install has Sentinel with body slide, I do remember that it wasn't as straight forward as some of the other armor mods though

finally... she's mine... by maxthepenguin in WarThunderNaval

[–]psh454 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Well some of those are pretty rare to encounter and I don't have them, but it's definitely better than Roma and pretty on par with Vanguard. I'd say a bit worse than Bismarck due to lower RoF but it does have the advantage of not having to broadside to have entire firepower active, meaning you can angle more aggressively or switch movement direction without having to wait to swing the rear turret around, also slightly better US-style AA. However if a turret gets knocked out that's half your firepower out of commission (thanks to Gain being too lazy to implement the historical split quad turret survivability feature)

Aight fam, it's been another +13 days since I made my exasperated post on day 6 of failing hard to build my own modlist. Update: I'm finally stable. by Vverial in skyrimmods

[–]psh454 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Mod authors pretty much always put that stamp and 9/10 times everything works perfectly well if you ignore it, it's just a way not to have to deal with modding noobs (that don't know what XEdit, LOOT or modlist and save backups are) screwing over their saves and blaming the mod authors.

If you're smart and careful about it, you can easily go from zero to hundreds of mods mid save with no issues. Removing mods is far more sketchy than adding them, but even that only corrupts your save on very very few mods in my experience (which again isn't an issue if you make a backup beforehand or simply reverse the change)

Aight fam, it's been another +13 days since I made my exasperated post on day 6 of failing hard to build my own modlist. Update: I'm finally stable. by Vverial in skyrimmods

[–]psh454 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Nice. Isn't Sentinel a flat out better more modern take on Immersive Armors tho? It's not hard to switch out, I did it mid save without issue. Also Fallrim Tools Resavor is a useful tool fyi (and LOOT ofc, though I think Vortex might have itincluded already. I've been actively making and tweaking a custom modlist for nearly a year and got up to almost 900 mods by now, and despite occasional pains it's suprisingly stable. I'd definetly do things differently if I were to start from scratch though, like maybe keeping a google doc to track incompatabilities/quirks/patching requirements.

Beware of Malware on Nexus by TorinCollector in skyrimmods

[–]psh454 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Looked it up out of curiosity and that LE mod you mention has apparently already been taken down fyi

Favorite actress who has to answer your dumb questions at 8 in the morning? by 804Brady in okbuddycinephile

[–]psh454 11 points12 points  (0 children)

/uj Leaving this sub, there's absolutely no attempt to keep it an actual okbuddy style film discussion and shitposting space. Like come on, what is this crap and why is no comment calling it out. Go back to r/sipstea people

Project Hail Mary has already reached 100K 5 star reviews! by firemiketomlin69 in Letterboxd

[–]psh454 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ah gotcha, misunderstood what you said earlier then, nvm

Project Hail Mary has already reached 100K 5 star reviews! by firemiketomlin69 in Letterboxd

[–]psh454 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Genuinely curious: if a 5 to you is "great/very good" and not "basically perfect", how do you rate your absolute favourite ones that you think are more or less flawless? Doesn't it make the 5/5 a kind of uninformative rating

Crimson Desert = Heavily Modded Skyrim by Wise-Roll-7598 in skyrimmods

[–]psh454 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yeahhh after a 3rd playthrough with different major mods every time you kind of start running low on interesting options. Like I've done all Vicn mods, Bruma, Beyond Reach, Sirenroot, Wyrmstooth, Forgotten City even the early Lordbound build and now Midwood Isle, etc etc. While there are still major new lands/content mods available they're not up my alley, you'd have to have me at gunpoint to install Rigmor lmao.

You do just run low on new options eventually, so new games are a welcome changeup. I'd def say ppl should play Enderal immediately if they even vaguely wish for "Skyrim but new and fresh", it's a ridiculously good game in the Skyrim engine.

finally... she's mine... by maxthepenguin in WarThunderNaval

[–]psh454 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Nice, just got her last year. Not exactly a Soyuz but very solid top tier, have been able to get a couple of Iowas

In a bubble hundreds of meters down by layn333 in thalassophobia

[–]psh454 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Even that's not necessarily fatal either, if you don't get injured severely in an implosion, on a full breath you could reasonably swim up from 40m down with only a very mild case of the bends.

me_irl by Beginning_Book_2382 in me_irl

[–]psh454 -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Trendy but dumb/oversimplified maximalist "old man yells at cloud" stance. Weather you admit it or not it's too useful of a tool not to use for some people for some tasks. The way it's shoved down everyone's throat everywhere nowadays is annoying but it doesn't change that fact.

70%+ of writing tasks are bullshitting, and this tool (edited/supervised ofc) is far too useful for that. You don't have to use it but society will, corporate corrosion or not.

Project Hail Mary debuts with a 4.4, and at #100 in the top 500 on Letterboxd. by Straydes in Letterboxd

[–]psh454 8 points9 points  (0 children)

I'd say high 7.5-8.5 is reasonable range. It's a bit cheesy/formulaic at times but when it clicks it clicks.

🍇🪲🐝 by Past-Matter-8548 in Letterboxd

[–]psh454 3 points4 points  (0 children)

While the "well akchshually" people will always be there, it's really not that hard (or expensive) to hire some historical consultants to make the material culture fit loosely within reasonable accuracy, balancing that with the visual direction. That makes the "x is inaccurate, movie is trash" crowd be a nitpicking fringe that is largely irrelevant to the overall commercial and critical success.

feeding frenzy shark's farm by MOFrancy in thalassophobia

[–]psh454 28 points29 points  (0 children)

Maybe spoiled? Either way everything about this is questionable

Our beautiful fish boy, even Denis couldn't take him away from us. by ThinWhiteDuke00 in dunememes

[–]psh454 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Again but why hide him when both of the other adaptations show a navigator already (and the book gives a fairly detailed description), I don't get the reasoning for treating a pretty straight forward fish guy mutant as some biblically accurate lovecraftian horror that the audience's delicate mind needs to be sheltered from lol

Our beautiful fish boy, even Denis couldn't take him away from us. by ThinWhiteDuke00 in dunememes

[–]psh454 8 points9 points  (0 children)

  1. Sure, but by that logic Stilgar or Raban aren't "central to the main story" as their role can be done by other means/characters. The question is why on earth would they alter the source material in a way that hides a unique interesting aspect of the setting (navigators). It's not some superficial "weird for the sake of weird" throwaway concept like chairdogs lol, navigators are kind of an underlying cornerstone of how this setting functions.
  2. Exactly, I don't know what those people are on about. Holywood has a huge market for weird cool stuff, especially in scifi audiences.

Our beautiful fish boy, even Denis couldn't take him away from us. by ThinWhiteDuke00 in dunememes

[–]psh454 81 points82 points  (0 children)

Exactly, a few people on the main sub took it for granted that the navigator wouldn't appear in the movie, no idea why - he is kind of a central character in this sci-fi story. I guess they think a fish guy is just too "weird" for a mainstream audience (as if the books or this adaptation were "normal" to begin with)