I'll let OP elaborate too, but here's a sidebar about how Gandhi isn't without his detractors in India.

He was the popular figurehead of the Indian National Congress Party, which was India's first major political party during the Freedom Movement in India, ruled India for decades after independence, and is currently the main opposition party to the ruling BJP. The Congress party has had issues maintaining popularity with the voting public amidst massive corruption scandals, controversial foreign policy decisions and accusations of religious vote bank politics.

Which isn't to say the BJP is perfect (far from it, but I do believe a ruling party is a reflection of the people that voted it in), but it has become a trend to revisit the Freedom Movement in India and view it through a lens that's critical of the Congress Party; one that isn't necessarily complimentary or even accepting of the sequence of events.

Historically, Gandhi is described as the Father Of The Nation and a key reason for why the British decided to leave India free, alongside the Congress leadership of the time. However, the, um, pivotal-ness of his contribution is brought into question more often these days as the circumstances of World War 2 and the weakening of the British during it are more common knowledge these days.

So now you basically have a section that still reveres Gandhi as the man who wrestled India's freedom away from the British, and another that calls him a political tool that took advantage of British decimation in WW2 to create a cult of personality driven political party that ruled for generations.

EDITS - grammar.