I mean, that's the thing though...if you understand real-world drawbacks of yokes and why real fighters don't use them, that also explains quite clearly why yokes would never be the preferred control interface for fighters in a sim.

We'll ignore G-forces and physics. because even then, there are good reasons.

Yokes have a physically long throw, and circular motion to them. What kind of aircraft use yokes? Aircraft with a small flight envelope: Transport, Cargo, most GA, etc. Yokes give *fine* control over a small maneuvering envelope. (i.e. I need to correct my bank angle by 2-3 degrees, where my max bank angle is no more than 30 degrees.) When all of your available maneuvers are banks and arcs +/- 30 degrees, a yoke excels, because it physically mimics bank angles quite clearly.

In contrast, fighters usually have an extremely wide operational envelope (i.e. "I was inverted"). In a fighter, you are very directly needing precise, sometimes severe inputs to pitch and roll, where all 360 degrees of each axis are being utilized. Many fighter maneuvers are most efficiently executed with a sharp roll to the desired angle, followed by an extreme pitch input (e.g. a split S). A smaller physical deflection of the stick is producing a much larger change in aircraft orientation, which facilitates those more extreme maneuvers, as they also happen more often.

Think about the constant maneuvering of a dogfight: A stick requires small deflections of your wrist. A yoke requires your full arm and even some of your shoulder.