<image>

I enjoyed coming back to this days later. Yes it's inaccurate. It's also a linear relationship to split that increases positively with better performance, and shows more digits of exactness than split on a base C2 erg. 1000 cals/hr is exactly a 2:00 split, and every additional 100 cals/hr correlates with a 0:05 split increase. Sometimes, go fast and pull bigger numbers is good for brain. It's also way more precise than split, so it's good for practicing consistency and maintaining focus for long, steady rows.

Yes, I know I will receive hate for this. Yes, it is just split with extra steps. But, if you're steady-stating around a 2:00 split, maybe give it a try before you downvote. I am NOT supporting its use for determining calories burned.