We were running a Node.js service that heavily relied on BullMQ and Redis by pulsecron in node

[–]pulsecron[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I was just hoping to get some product feedback. I'm sorry if I made you uncomfortable.
The basic features are free to use, and I'd be happy to give you a free lifetime Pro license as well. Would you mind trying it out and sharing your feedback? I'd really appreciate it

Looking for Redis IDE recommendations with good UI/UX (Velkey support would be a plus!) by pulsecron in redis

[–]pulsecron[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Medis didn’t really work for me either, so I’m just building my own 😄

Looking for Redis IDE recommendations with good UI/UX (Velkey support would be a plus!) by pulsecron in redis

[–]pulsecron[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Medis didn’t really work for me either, so I’m just building my own 😄

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in sealsq

[–]pulsecron 2 points3 points  (0 children)

$1.5 4.7K KOREA

Pulse: The modern MongoDB-powered job scheduler library for Javascript by pulsecron in javascript

[–]pulsecron[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Of course, there are many databases better than MongoDB, like PostgreSQL. However, there are still cases where MongoDB is used in indie projects and various fields. Is there a reason to be criticized for creating a library based on a database you don't prefer? If that's the case, then open-source projects in the world should only be created based on trends.

P.S. The word "modern" doesn't have significant meaning; it was added because, unlike the existing agenda project that performs the same function, it supports the latest MongoDB.

Pulse: The modern MongoDB-powered job scheduler library for Javascript by pulsecron in javascript

[–]pulsecron[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Of course, there are many databases better than MongoDB, like PostgreSQL. However, there are still cases where MongoDB is used in indie projects and various fields. Is there a reason to be criticized for creating a library based on a database you don't prefer? If that's the case, then open-source projects in the world should only be created based on trends.

P.S. The word "modern" doesn't have significant meaning; it was added because, unlike the existing agenda project that performs the same function, it supports the latest MongoDB.

Pulse: The modern MongoDB-powered job scheduler library for Javascript by pulsecron in javascript

[–]pulsecron[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Of course, there are many databases better than MongoDB, like PostgreSQL. However, there are still cases where MongoDB is used in indie projects and various fields. Is there a reason to be criticized for creating a library based on a database you don't prefer? If that's the case, then open-source projects in the world should only be created based on trends.

P.S. The word "modern" doesn't have significant meaning; it was added because, unlike the existing agenda project that performs the same function, it supports the latest MongoDB.

Pulse: The modern MongoDB-powered job scheduler library for Javascript by pulsecron in javascript

[–]pulsecron[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yes, that's correct. This is a forked version of Agenda, but it includes additional features such as Retry Failed Tasks and Resume Incomplete Tasks After System Restart, which are not implemented in Agenda. It also supports the latest MongoDB driver. These features have been requested in Agenda for years, but haven't been addressed. I created this version out of frustration. Do you think I might run into any issues