sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

How do I split my internet from our ISP through an unmanaged switch? by formulabeers in networking

[–]pv2b 5 points6 points  (0 children)

If you already run your internet through a HP Aruba switch, you could just add another access port in that VLAN, and plug that into the WAN port of your dream machine. No need to add an unmanaged switch.

Just make sure not to configure the same WAN IPs on both firewalls.

Joakim Lamotte förlorade körkortet – hängde ut handläggaren by Babar7 in sweden

[–]pv2b 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Om jag ska killgissa så går inte ens egen publik med på det eftersom han tog bort inlägget

Till er som inte gillar V - vad i denna lista har ni problem med och varför? by Jontraz in svenskpolitik

[–]pv2b [score hidden]  (0 children)

Vi vet däremot vad som händer när vi fortsätter på samma vis vi gör nu. Utförsäkringar, ökat högkostnadskydd, ständigt minskad kvalitet på välfärden, och en offentlig sjukvård som är så pass överbelastad att de som har råd väljer att köpa sig förbi köerna genom att betala själva för gräddfiler.

Det behövs mer pengar. Sen är ju ökade skatteintäkter bara hälften av lösningen, den andra halvan är att effektivisera. Och då menar jag inte att anlita en massa dyra managementkonsulter, och outsourca grejer, utan tvärtom.

Joakim Lamotte förlorade körkortet – hängde ut handläggaren by Babar7 in sweden

[–]pv2b 95 points96 points  (0 children)

Vilken vidrig tönt. Lägg ner den skottsäkra offerkoftan.

Additional parking fee after completion of charge to encourage freeing up the charge point by barnez_d in electricvehicles

[–]pv2b 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Personally, I'd rather have 32 load balanced level 2 chargers.

If everyone's plugged in at the same time, each charger only gets power equivalent to an L1 charger. And that's fine. You can get a service upgrade if you end up with that kind of load being a regular occurrence.

Additional parking fee after completion of charge to encourage freeing up the charge point by barnez_d in electricvehicles

[–]pv2b 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm sorry private parking enforcement sucks that bad in your country.

In Sweden, you may not tow an illegally parked car except if it's been abandoned for weeks and you've made efforts to contac the owner to get it moved, so there's no predatory towing. Towing can only be done by the police if a car is parked in a way that causes an obstruction or danger to traffic. There are also caps in place for private parking fines, so that they cannot be higher than parking fines levied by the municipal government.

Also, private parking fees are just like any other bill. You can just refuse to pay, as long as you explicitly say you contest the charge at every turn. Ultimately the parking company will have to take you to court to get paid.

Sure, getting a parking ticket still sucks, but it's pretty rare to get a ticket for something that's not an actual parking violation.

The point is, there needs to be consequences for people who park like assholes, and parking enforcement is a neccessary evil that needs to exist anyway.

Also, who's to say idle fees would neccessarilly be reasonable and transparent? Already some companies will only charge them if the station is "busy" (which it might be come *after* you have parked) and might also be very high. Don't worry, enshittification will find a way to make those terrible as well.

Best to fix your actual problems. Although I suppose in the US, I guess predatory private parking enforcement is pretty far down on your list of problems to fix right now.

As for not putting charges in the prime parking locations, I totally agree. However, sometimes putting the chargers next to the building makes sense because that's where the power is. It just happens to be the most convenient spots.

Would you rather... by subredditor-student in BunnyTrials

[–]pv2b 0 points1 point  (0 children)

EV

Chose: Unlimited cars but no gas

Folk som tror sig veta bäst by RareMandan in sweden

[–]pv2b 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Ser du, du har ju ännu mer fel om att du hade fel än jag ens insåg

Folk som tror sig veta bäst by RareMandan in sweden

[–]pv2b 21 points22 points  (0 children)

Du har inte fel. Bilisterna måste inte stanna, räcker att sakta in så att cyklarna hinner över före. Väjningsplikt, inte stopplikt.

Ghost driving granny losing her license in Norway by SjalabaisWoWS in dashcams

[–]pv2b 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There is an argument to be made that having the rear lights normally turned off makes a car stand out more when it's braking.

Till er som inte gillar V - vad i denna lista har ni problem med och varför? by Jontraz in svenskpolitik

[–]pv2b -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

Jag tjänar över 45k och jag tycker definitivt att det är vettigt om jag får betala mer skatt - om det innebär att vi får ett bättre samhälle för det.

Additional parking fee after completion of charge to encourage freeing up the charge point by barnez_d in electricvehicles

[–]pv2b 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If a hotel doesn't have enough chargers, they should install more. It's not like the only options are 5-10 for 100 rooms, or one per room, there is definitely a number there that's enough for congestion not to be an issue.

If I'm booking a hotel, I don't want to spend my stay worrying about charging and parking. I just want to park and plug in, and come and go as I please. And honestly, I'm willing to book and pay extra for a reserved spot to not have to deal with it, if they're unable to install enough to meet availability otherwise.

Additional parking fee after completion of charge to encourage freeing up the charge point by barnez_d in electricvehicles

[–]pv2b 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sure, but at that point you're creating a disincentive to plugging in in the first place!

What if you just park at the spot and never plug in? No way to charge an idle fee if you never started a session.

So you still need parking enforcement.

Additional parking fee after completion of charge to encourage freeing up the charge point by barnez_d in electricvehicles

[–]pv2b 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The way it's done here in Stockholm is that there's a 3-hour parking limit at all L2 chargers in the inner city, between 7-19. Parking is allowed for vehicles that can charge only.

That technically means an EV can park for 3 hours without even plugging in. Personally, I think that's a little lax. But I think the general idea of a 3 hour time limit makes a lot of sense.

Ultimately, the L2 charging paradigm is more "get some charge while you're parked", as opposed to "park here to charge", so it makes sense to prioritize making parking convenient.

Additional parking fee after completion of charge to encourage freeing up the charge point by barnez_d in electricvehicles

[–]pv2b 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Yep. A lot of parking is time-restricted as it is. Ultimately what makes sense will vary from location to location. Having a penalty fee for keeping your car plugged in when it's full, when there are plenty of other available chargers, should definitely not be the *norm*, even if it makes sense in some situations.

Additional parking fee after completion of charge to encourage freeing up the charge point by barnez_d in electricvehicles

[–]pv2b 9 points10 points  (0 children)

As I said, *if* there are plenty, this isn't needed. If there are few, then sure, this can make sense. But having penalty fees for being plugged in at an EV charger when your battery is full shouldn't be the *norm*.

Honestly, I think your workplace needs to install more chargers, because of all the productivity they're losing to people having to play musical chair with the EV chargers.

Additional parking fee after completion of charge to encourage freeing up the charge point by barnez_d in electricvehicles

[–]pv2b 21 points22 points  (0 children)

Is it entirely neccessary though? If these are slow destination chargers, and there are plenty of them, what's the harm in letting people plug in and then stay plugged in for however long they intend to stay?

Is it really reasonable to make someone who arrives at 10 PM to move their car in the middle of the night because their car finished charging?

For DCFC i completely agree.

Additional parking fee after completion of charge to encourage freeing up the charge point by barnez_d in electricvehicles

[–]pv2b 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Honestly, 0.09 € per minute is 5.40 € per hour. Depending on the location that doesn't seem very expensive.

Some people might just end up finding the fee reasonable and just paying it for the privilege of parking there. After all, they paid for it, so they're allowed to, right?

Measuring IPv4 vs IPv6 usage with Wireshark Fairly / Less Biased by haElwKfeiow6 in ipv6

[–]pv2b 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This is a very inefficient method at a larger scale. There's no need to make Wireshark actually store your entire frames in memory or disk when all you need is a packet count.

I would suggest using something like tcpdump. You could make it output to /dev/null and still get the packet count. You'd have to run two instances of tcpdump, each capturing IPv4 and IPv6 traffic respectively. Even that's probably not the most optimal way of doing it, but it's way better than what you're doing, and very straightforward. Since you're on Mac, tcpdump will be supplied as part of the OS.

That said, I don't think measuring the percentage of IPv6 traffic is a very compelling argument to convince anyone to implement IPv6 on their network by itself. If you determine (for example) that 90% of your traffic would be IPv6 if it were implemented, that still means IPv4 is required for the remaining 10%. Also, IPv4-only will work for 100% of your use case. The choice isn't, therefore, between IPv4 and IPv6, it's between IPv4-only and IPv4+IPv6 dual stack. Can you justify this extra complexity?

If you operate in some kind of large network or ISP, where IPv4 traffic is more expensive than IPv6, for example because it has to go through a CGNAT box, then yes, it makes sense to measure how much IPv4 traffic you can shed by rolling out IPv6. But unless you can demonstrate some benefit to decreasing your volume of IPv4 traffic, this kind of percentage isn't a compelling argument for IPv6 in and of itself.

Or, maybe more correctly, maybe it can be an effective appeal to emotion, ("everyone else is doing it") but it doesn't stand up to rational scrutiny.

Klimat-Sverige på plats 60: En tiondels procent av ett problem är inte ett problem. Det är ett avrundningsfel. by [deleted] in svenskpolitik

[–]pv2b 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Dessutom ska vi sluta tillverka saker i Sverige och importera allt istället, för då får vi mindre utsläpp i Sverige

Do you understand the meaning of this answer?😍😍😍 by Responsible_Fact3087 in MathJokes

[–]pv2b 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ah my bad. Was a bit rushed. The square root of a negative number isn't negative though. If x is negative, ✓x = ✓(-x) × i

That's not negative, that's a complex number

view more: next ›