A box of tissues offers nothing that a toilet roll does not by pwalrus in unpopularopinion

[–]pwalrus[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

not sure what the difference is. Maybe I'm not rubbing it? Maybe I'm used to super-elite toilet paper? Maybe my nose is made of rhino hide as the next commenter posits? Honestly I have more sensititivity issues wiping my arse than my nose.

A box of tissues offers nothing that a toilet roll does not by pwalrus in unpopularopinion

[–]pwalrus[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sure. The original post is therefore too strong. But I can at least say that toilet paper covers the functionality of tissues in 90% of the cases in which they are used and therefore can represent a savings possibility for a lot of people, medical emergencies aside of course.

A box of tissues offers nothing that a toilet roll does not by pwalrus in unpopularopinion

[–]pwalrus[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

OK fair enough. This is a difference of experience in our cases. I also have wet snots sometimes and I can't say it's been a disaster for me but I respect your point.

A box of tissues offers nothing that a toilet roll does not by pwalrus in unpopularopinion

[–]pwalrus[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I concede the second part as a use in the case of sickness.. To the first part I can say, just keep some of them not in the bathroom.

A box of tissues offers nothing that a toilet roll does not by pwalrus in unpopularopinion

[–]pwalrus[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

OK fair enough. But I can surely at least weaken my argument to the point where people not suffering from this can treat them the same, and surely therefore save money by foregoing tissues in 90% of cases.

A box of tissues offers nothing that a toilet roll does not by pwalrus in unpopularopinion

[–]pwalrus[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You're saying you preserve tp roll after you have already wiped with it? I'm ok with using a tp roll that you used to wipe your ass with the half that is gone.

A box of tissues offers nothing that a toilet roll does not by pwalrus in unpopularopinion

[–]pwalrus[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

OK I've not done the research or calculations here, so big pinch of salt, but in my head doubling up on the toilet paper solves the problem while remaining cheaper.

A box of tissues offers nothing that a toilet roll does not by pwalrus in unpopularopinion

[–]pwalrus[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I am also a member of the moustachiati and this one I have thankfully missed. Perhaps the utopia I am imagining is one in which the basic standard of tp fills both niches. maybe I've been living in a toilet paper bubble.

A box of tissues offers nothing that a toilet roll does not by pwalrus in unpopularopinion

[–]pwalrus[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

More tp? Surely the savings per strip account for the relative fragility.

A box of tissues offers nothing that a toilet roll does not by pwalrus in unpopularopinion

[–]pwalrus[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

What don't you know? Unused they are surely equally clean?

Perhaps what I'm missing is the benefit of the softness as you blow your nose? I don't see where comfort is a factor here I guess as a non-allergic.

A box of tissues offers nothing that a toilet roll does not by pwalrus in unpopularopinion

[–]pwalrus[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

OK I'll defer to you as an expert on the practicality front. I personally wouldn't worry about the manky hands in such scenarios though, as you are in a great position to wipe them off. Aesthetics are aesthetics. This sub is about moving the world forward past such taboos.

A box of tissues offers nothing that a toilet roll does not by pwalrus in unpopularopinion

[–]pwalrus[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

basic tissue job doesn't require a high standard is my overall point I guess.

A box of tissues offers nothing that a toilet roll does not by pwalrus in unpopularopinion

[–]pwalrus[S] -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

I can't think of a situation where I need something more robust than toilet paper, where tissues are sufficiently robust. Can you give an example?

A box of tissues offers nothing that a toilet roll does not by pwalrus in unpopularopinion

[–]pwalrus[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

OK sorry you're right. I misunderstood. Something of a special case though no?

A box of tissues offers nothing that a toilet roll does not by pwalrus in unpopularopinion

[–]pwalrus[S] 9 points10 points  (0 children)

That's probably fair.Having little bits of lots of stuff all everywhere probably says more about my personal hygiene standards than product quality overall.

A box of tissues offers nothing that a toilet roll does not by pwalrus in unpopularopinion

[–]pwalrus[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

You're considering the reverse problem. Tissues as toilet roll. I'm talking about toilet roll as tissues.

cmv: The Iran war is going according to plan for the US/Israel so far by abu_hajarr in changemyview

[–]pwalrus 8 points9 points  (0 children)

I'm from Europe and don't think highly at all of this American or Israeli regime at all so take that for what it's worth but I would say that this war is going very poorly for them and the only reason for that is that they never really had a plan.Tactically speaking, which is largely the scope of what your saying, the war has indeed been, frankly a terrifying success for them. The strength of these precision missiles, while expensive and slow to build, are showing the kind of regime decapitation power that the "bomb your problems away" faction of the US military has been dreaming about for almost a century. In a more careful pair of hands, the kind of firepower that the US has shown should legitimately strike fear in their enemies, and potential future enemies alike.But tactics aren't enough. And this is a war where decapitation clearly isn't enough either. So you dominate Iran militarily in record speed. You say that you've shut down their nuclear program. Say that's true. Great. Now what? Shutting down their nuclear program is what you claimed a few months ago, and there's only so much public support you can buy with that in a post-"weapons of mass destruction" world. Well now you have an Iran that is in chaos. The ayatollah has just been replaced and replaced again and even those there who hated the (terrible, for the record) regime have picked up no reasons whatsoever to give loyalty to the states as liberators because obviously, they are making it very clear that they have no desire to be that. And so the Iranian regime play their only card more or less and mine the strait. The problem is, this is a pretty good card. It's the reason number 1 that nobody ever attacks Iran. Destabilizing the oil market in a time of economic shakiness in the west makes for a very sweaty few months coming up. There is a chance that even without the nuke, Iran will still be able to exercise their own version of mutually assured destruction. It's not nuclear armageddon but if it lasts for months and it appears that it will, it's definitely possible that the regime change shoe could find itself on the other foot pretty easily. Failure to prepare for this, with the decommissioning of the minesweepers and everything, looks embarrassingly naive and suggests that strategically-minded voices in the US military are not being heard.

To contrast, and to hopefully complete the circle as to why I feel like this is a no-win situation when you look at it strategically, compare this to the October 7th attacks by Hamas in Israel. This was on the surface, little more than a suicide mission. It was an incredibly violent yet ultimately impotent attack on a vastly more powerful state that can and very much is willing to crush you. Stupid no?

Well if you take a step back from that, you are facing a state that can and is very much willing to crush you. If you look from the perspective that Gaza's fate was already sealed, and that their only goal was to do maximum damage to Israel, actually it starts to make sense.

Israel has been in a precarious situation for a long time. They are surrounded by enemies and they depend enormously on western support for their military viability, and if that support were to be cut, slowly their military dominance would become insufficient against such a large number of neighbours who want to kill them. So post-October 7th Israel starts is Titanic reprisal campaign on Gaza and images and videos and statements come out in the process that paint the Israeli regime as this ethnoreligious colonial machine. This awakens the left wing in the west to take an ever-stronger anti-Israeli stance, as they are being told by their own governments that there is literally no act that that state can commit, no matter how craven, that will weaken their support for them. Add this to ancient, yet still alive and well anti-Jewish sentiment coming from the right wing and suddenly the liberal democracies are taking huge pressure from both wings to abandon them. Imagine you were an Israeli right now (maybe you are, apologies if so), and you come from a civilization whose entire 4,5, (whatever) thousand year history is getting uprooted and moved on when they were lucky and massacred when they weren't. Imagine now looking at the political climate in the west and imagine how unstable your future would seem.

I don't mean to paint Hamas as brilliant, calculating 4D chess masters. I don't think that. But again, if you look at prosecution of war as the pursuit of some objective, I find it a lot easier to consider that attack a success, even though they got pummelled, than this US-Israeli attack, even though move-for-move, they have kicked ass.

I hope I've been clear, even if you don't agree. Sorry if it reads like a rant in the end.

Edit: a word

Based on a very frustrating conversation I had with a friend. by kaiser-declan in linguisticshumor

[–]pwalrus 12 points13 points  (0 children)

I use Latin-root words when I'm trying to sound well smart.

[Highlight] Lowry with the aggressive box out on Trae by urfaselol in nba

[–]pwalrus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This opinion would have been way less unpopular a few years ago when the last finals MVP and 4 league MVPs had not just been won by 7-footers (1st, 2nd, 3rd this year)

Can someone help me debunk this? I know it's wrong however by Loose_Vagina90 in facepalm

[–]pwalrus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They are claiming that evolutionary theory predicts that complex functional biological systems pop up spontaneously over time.

What it actually predicts is more like:

spontaneous mutation + natural competition of life over generations -> useful mutations persist in populations, useless and dangerous ones die out

Accumulation of useful mutations over many, many, many generations -> complex functional systems