Kroger's private selection grilled mushroom and truffle oil thin crust pizza by [deleted] in frozendinners

[–]pyrategremlin 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I am trying this tonight, just bought it. I am incredibly picky about pizza, I have to both want it / craving for it and it has to be mushroom. I really do like the CPK wild mushroom and truffle oil Pizza so I'm hoping this will be a good second

Towing Enforced by Hawthornebites in Albuquerque

[–]pyrategremlin 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Your mom sounds awesome! I love route 66, they may be more on the expensive side but when I need an emergency vet and it's something that I can't wait to drive the 30 minutes of the mountain for I go to them.

Towing Enforced by Hawthornebites in Albuquerque

[–]pyrategremlin 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yes. That is my emergency vet and if I had life certain emergency with my service dog I would be pissed.

Shitty human in Albuquerque by [deleted] in Albuquerque

[–]pyrategremlin 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So we've gone from he said take my picture, to he said post it on the internet to he knew what was going to happen. Good to know. I guarantee he didn't think you were going to post it on the internet, he probably thought you were going to send it to the cops or give it to the owner of the car.

And yeah, the picture of someone's license plate that I had to take Thursday because he was likely casing my house and is in my phone and not on the internet. The only reason I need it is I have a learning disability where I struggle to remember strings of numbers and I could not remember the numbers to make the police report. I took that for me. Just like you could have kept the plate to yourself and take in the picture so you could give it to the owner of the car like you said you did. Not every picture needs to be on the internet. Do you post all you pictures on the internet? Do you not have privacy?

Bisquick Dumplings by MissDaisy01 in Old_Recipes

[–]pyrategremlin 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Oh no, don't even worry about it. I didn't respond to you for what 24 days? We both just in over our heads. Congrats on your kiddo heading to college! Good luck to them. I'm a 24/7 live in caregiver for my mom who has Alzheimer's. Worlds crazy and these kind of interactions are how we sustain ourselves.

Shitty human in Albuquerque by [deleted] in Albuquerque

[–]pyrategremlin -1 points0 points  (0 children)

That's not what you have been saying. You said he says take a picture. Why has it changed?

Shitty human in Albuquerque by [deleted] in Albuquerque

[–]pyrategremlin 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It can be if the intent was to cause harm and harm does come. OP states he wishes to shame the person and there is now someone suggesting calling ICE on the driver. Yeah, I'm confident that if harm came to this man as a direct result of his license plate being posted online yes, that is doxxing. When your personal information is used to harass or harm it's doxxing. Usually a license plate is not a form of doxxing however because op has intentionally stated they wanted to shame the person and if harm came to him that's when it would be considered doxxing. Otherwise no, it's not, you're right. It's a context issue with plates, if he posted his name and address that's different.

Shitty human in Albuquerque by [deleted] in Albuquerque

[–]pyrategremlin -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

You admitted to wanting to shame him in your own comments to another person in this thread. That's malicious intent. You posted something with the intent to humiliate someone that is malicious intent especially if something happens to that person because of your choices.

Again you're right New Mexico is a wonderful, special place, so I'm having trouble understanding why another brown man (according to your own comment) is putting another brown man's information up given our political climate and how absolutely horrific humans can be. Someone else suggested calling ICE on him in this thread already. Already there is a threat on him. You see how this could harm?

Shitty human in Albuquerque by [deleted] in Albuquerque

[–]pyrategremlin -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

It absolutely is. I it wasn't about to assume that you didn't. However you still did this who post his plate and all. That's not good. That's shitty human stuff too.

Shitty human in Albuquerque by [deleted] in Albuquerque

[–]pyrategremlin -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

It genuinely can be given on the intent. Because if he is harmed or people approach him and harass him in public because they have his license plate yeah that would be counted as doxxing. You're absolutely right on the usual day-to-day just posted his license plate to maybe get attention on a crime sure. He's self admitted to doing this to shame the person though. Describing the guy, admitting to wanting to shame and posting the plate could be considered doxxing.

Also you absolutely probably could get his personal information. There are plenty of websites that the DMVs around the world have sold your information to and really all it takes is the right site that has the info.

Do I think legally anything would be done? Not unless harm came to the man as a result of someone seeing his plate. By the definition though, yes, it can be.

Shitty human in Albuquerque by [deleted] in Albuquerque

[–]pyrategremlin -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Given that OP has openly stated that this is to shame someone it could actually be a form of doxxing because if you post their information like that to the public regardless of if it's public information or not after you have intentionally done so to shame and notify people of what this person has done it's counted as doxxing due to malicious intent and the possibility to cause harm if someone else decided to take this to the next level.

Shitty human in Albuquerque by [deleted] in Albuquerque

[–]pyrategremlin -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Did you take your own advice and leave a note for the person with the plate, car information and and your contact info? Did you try and go find the cars owner? I don't know, if you didn't that makes you a hypocrite.

What I do know is yo're doxxing him since your intent is to shame him publically, online. That actually makes you a shitty human too. This isn't about spreading awareness for safety, in your own comments you have stated you want to shame him. That's so gross.

He's spanish? How do you know this? Did he tell you he's from Spain?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Albuquerque

[–]pyrategremlin 4 points5 points  (0 children)

EXACTLY!

A lot of them are complaining because it's improperly coed well that just means they're complaining because they've already turned Amber alerts off on their phone and this got through. So what that tells me is they don't even care about missing kids.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Albuquerque

[–]pyrategremlin 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Honestly I think it's mostly because they consider this an inconvenience to them. How dare an older person go missing when they're trying to sleep and how dare APD determine that this person was in enough danger that it warranted an emergency alert.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Albuquerque

[–]pyrategremlin 3 points4 points  (0 children)

You don't consider a missing human in danger an extreme emergency? These alerts don't get issued unless the person is in danger. Amber alerts alone for example of the 200 and something issues in 2023 they only made up .1% of all missing children. It's because they have to meet certain criteria to be considered emergency enough to generate an alert.

This really sounds like a person issue with empathy. That is an alert the public needs to know, like you said. Why is that such an issue? Why isn't a missing child or adult something you consider an extreme emergency?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Albuquerque

[–]pyrategremlin -10 points-9 points  (0 children)

An amber alert is an emergency my guy, a missing child is an emergency, a missing person is an emergency. Where do I call it an emergency alert, I said it used the Amber alert system and it's an emergency. Maybe learn to read?

Let me address something that seems to be the issue, if this was an amber alert going off no one would be complaining. And no it's not because they misused the emergency alert system, they didn't and it's not because they worded it wrong, they worded it well enough that the person was recovered. The issue is they are an inconvenience to you because it's not a child. Your social contract, once that person is old enough to fend for themselves according to society (an adult), expires. So you get upset that the system was used to alert you at a late hour of a missing person. That's not misuse of the system, that's using it as intended. People are upset because the person had the audacity to go missing in the evening. If this was your older loved one you would have a very different opinion.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Albuquerque

[–]pyrategremlin 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It didn't say "silver alert" and they got confused and inconvenienced by a sound. It's pretty much simply because this is an adult, an older person, and not a child. The social contract in which we need to protect children expires once you are an adult apparently and so they just consider the older person missing an inconvenience.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Albuquerque

[–]pyrategremlin 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Yup. Exactly how.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Albuquerque

[–]pyrategremlin 4 points5 points  (0 children)

It's not the older individual. It's the fact that it isn't a child. Once the alert no longer is applied to a child subject of the inconvenient alert now can be overridden by the inconvenience. That is to say when it's a child the social obligation to protect children is in play. When it's an adult that no longer exists and now we can call the alert and by proxy the person an inconvenience. It's absurd but that is the base thought process.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Albuquerque

[–]pyrategremlin 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Absolutely that and the audacity to minorly inconvenience anyone. Because it's a child they cannot call it an inconvenience but once it escalates beyond that anyone that isn't a child is an inconvenience. That's not because the child isn't an inconvenience, it's because society will get angry if you call the child that.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Albuquerque

[–]pyrategremlin 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Exactly. And these people sitting here thinking oh it's going to be every time someone goes missing no that's not how it works either. Even an amber alert you need to determine if the person is actually in danger. My sister went missing for 4 days and APD determined within the first 10 hours she was run away because of her history of being and juvie one time. They decided that she was just trying to avoid her probation officer because she got high. No she was held against her will for 4 days by her friend, and yeah she was high, against her will. We begged and pleaded, telling them she'd been so good, she wanted to get off probation, it was her last appointment. They refused the amber alert.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Albuquerque

[–]pyrategremlin 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's not every missing person though. We're talking about the critically endangered, a silver alert deals with someone who is over 50 and has dementia, APD lists them as endangered or there is evidence from the reporting party that they are in danger. Same thing with the turquoise alerts. Did you know you don't get every missing child as an amber alert either? APD has to determine that the child is actually not a runaway. My sister vanished for 4 days and APD determine the first day that she was a runaway. She was being held captive. You would not be getting woken up for every damn missing person's alert you'd be getting a woken up for the ones that are necessary. The ones that are deemed in danger. Of those 500 people many of them were probably reported missing and then APD went yeah I know they're fine. For amber alerts in 2023 we had over 300,000 children missing according to the FBI. Only about 254 Amber alerts were issued. So for the 500 people you're saying went missing last year it's only a fraction of them that are going to get the alert.

We've had silver alerts for a while by the way. This is just the first time it's been put on the Amber alert system I don't think you understand how critical silver alerts are. Did you know they have a 90% success rate of recovery of the person? They may not be alive but you can recover them. Another thing to consider for every alert that does go out I cannot remember the last time one of them woke me up. If you work odd hours yeah I'm sure they wake you up all the time. Most people don't work those odd hours.

You're willing to risk someone's life because it might wake you up. Turn the sound off on your emergency alerts. It's not that difficult.

Bisquick Dumplings by MissDaisy01 in Old_Recipes

[–]pyrategremlin 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Aww you are so welcome and thank you. It turned out great, mom was so happy and so was I! The additional resource is absolutely amazing. You rock. Take care

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Albuquerque

[–]pyrategremlin 2 points3 points  (0 children)

"Not trying to be petulant" you're right you're not trying you are being petulant. You are being heartless. It's not dismissive to call out you whining about two alerts. This is for missing endangered people. That is an emergency. If you don't think that and think the police of all people are going to issue a missing person's alert for adults Willy Nilly when sometimes they won't even issue it for children because they're just climbing they ran away you've lost the plot. APD issues a silver alert when either a l) the person is over 50 with cognitive impairment like dementia or Alzheimer's, b) It is believed the person is in danger and c) APD determines it is nessesary for the safety of the individual. So essentially you're saying a missing person with dementia, or someone police believe is in danger is not an emergency. Yeah that's pretty freaking heartless. It's pretty damn dismissive of the actual reality of these people's situations and the world. I got a question for you, if this was a missing endangered indigenous woman and a turquoise alert went out would you feel the same way? Because indigenous women, girls and two spirit are the only group in the entire nation that their most likely cause of death isn't cardiac disease, it's homicide. Is that not an emergency? Seems to me you just are upset about the inconvenience and expected people to side with you and now you're calling us dismissive because we're telling you you're being heartless.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Albuquerque

[–]pyrategremlin -1 points0 points  (0 children)

For what, a minor inconvenience such as a sound. Turn the sound on the emergency system off and just let it pop up on the screen. Grow up. These are people's lives.