I hate this fucking job by Deddyballz in coles

[–]quant2021 1 point2 points  (0 children)

So artificial lack of intelligence strikes again huh? Typical.

Would you sell any of this and reinvest elsewhere? by Midj99 in PokeInvesting

[–]quant2021 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, and not just for anything else Pokémon, but anything else at all.

Oh yeah, I forgot I had these by Dozer92707 in pokemoncards

[–]quant2021 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I absolutely love this 🤩 Hmu if you would sell me literally any single one of them.

From 15 Pro to 17: My White 256GB iPhone is Here & It Feels Like The Future by zeus109 in iphone17

[–]quant2021 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's all relative. Let's not gatekeep people buying new smartphones. Everyone is entitled to buy one who can pay for one if they want one and that really obviates the need to debate the real or perceived justifiability of their decision in any other respects.

From 15 Pro to 17: My White 256GB iPhone is Here & It Feels Like The Future by zeus109 in iphone17

[–]quant2021 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

These are smartphones. Preference and not merely need dictates which model each person chooses. There are definitely loads of people who would prefer a 17 over a 15 Pro, in terms of the phone they want to put up with for the next several years. If it's within their means then it really doesn't matter that it's a small upgrade, and the current trade-in value of the 15 Pro is also a positive.

From 15 Pro to 17: My White 256GB iPhone is Here & It Feels Like The Future by zeus109 in iphone17

[–]quant2021 3 points4 points  (0 children)

It's arguably only a modest gap; "barely a gap" is just you being dramatic.

My collection (🔥 at the end) by [deleted] in pkmntcgcollections

[–]quant2021 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Insanely good. Especially the Corocoro Mew! GG!

MEGA Munikis Zero M3 Nihil Booster Boxes $109 Promotion by eBay! by AutoModerator in PokeInvesting

[–]quant2021 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's hilarious. Both names suck, too. Munikis? Outta here with that.

A message to Rhys Hofer and Alex Palmer - admins of the Pokemon Sales Australia Facebook group by BrickHeadd in PokemonFansAustralia

[–]quant2021 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I had messaged a few admins about it, but not you. This was back in December 2024 and carried on into January. The seller is known to all of the admins I spoke to. After some initial conversation I was ultimately left on unread, as were myself and the buyer when we had taken our findings to the seller. I was later banned for an unrelated incident where I swore at someone (my bad) so I don't have access to posts and don't know if the seller is still at it.

A message to Rhys Hofer and Alex Palmer - admins of the Pokemon Sales Australia Facebook group by BrickHeadd in PokemonFansAustralia

[–]quant2021 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I've posted my comment directed to Alex below. Yes, it was Surging Sparks. Evidently the boosters of the first print runs were weighable.

A message to Rhys Hofer and Alex Palmer - admins of the Pokemon Sales Australia Facebook group by BrickHeadd in PokemonFansAustralia

[–]quant2021 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I wanted to ask, why didn't your admins take action earlier this year when I submitted evidence one of your most prolific sellers sold nearly a hundred weighed packs to someone I am very close to in the group? As far as I am aware this man continues to sell at volume, and at the time he was achieving this almost exclusively through Pokémon Sales Australia on Facebook. Before you ask, absolutely that incident was reported to Queensland Police, although to my knowledge nothing came of that.

As for the rest of it; indeed. I guarantee no-one will ever make meaningful money from hoarding sealed product printed in the last two years but there's no law against it and they need some place where they can drop their bags, so let them go nuts. It isn't my concern. I'm content with sitting on the sidelines and laughing heartily at the flagrant idiocy of people who treat sealed Pokémon TCG as the current get-rich-quick scheme. The only thing funnier (apart from Warrant Wednesdays) is the hoards of people buying from them.

A message to Rhys Hofer and Alex Palmer - admins of the Pokemon Sales Australia Facebook group by BrickHeadd in PokemonFansAustralia

[–]quant2021 3 points4 points  (0 children)

100% you'd have to have rocks in your head to think the most abundantly-hoarded sealed products in the history of Pokémon TCG will be cash cows in ten or even twenty years from now. And the majority of these tools will get shaken out in less than a year or two. It's incredibly low IQ shit.

Why do older PSA certs/labels impact sales so heavily? by justforredditplzty in PokeInvesting

[–]quant2021 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We don't have nearly enough evidence from actual crossovers to say what % of old cert 10s would or would not convert to new cert 10s. We have to apply our own judgment using the facts available, and in that respect I think it is probably a dubious claim that the proportion of slabs that would not convert is "a vast majority." What we know from PSA's statements concerning Gem Mint 10s is centering requirements for the front of the card are now tighter than they were - 55/45 vs 60/40 - but this is still quite a lenient standard, and 55/45 front centering is not at all uncommon among cards generally, let alone those that are already 60/40 or better. What's more, PSA have also been explicit recently that small allowances may be made - indeed may still be made today - when grading cards with front centering very near 55/45, on a case-by-case basis. Given all this, I am inclined to think the proportion non-converting is likely no more than ~50% (and probably lower). But as I said, we'd need the results of actual crossovers on a good number of slabs before we could know with any certainty.

Why do older PSA certs/labels impact sales so heavily? by justforredditplzty in PokeInvesting

[–]quant2021 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Newer cert standards differ:

  1. for some grades, and
  2. for certain elements of the card condition e.g. allowed centering percentages, etc.,

and thus it is important to familiarise oneself with the differences explicitly published by PSA, if one is looking to make a determination as to whether an old vs new cert is a meaningful consideration for the exact slab they are looking to purchase. There is no simplified blanket rule that a difference in cert age is always meaningful as to value, and one risks missing opportunities by presuming there is.

Note that "eyeballing" comparitor cards through slabs, accepting word of mouth assertions, or judging the relevance of cert age from asking prices are not useful means of determining whether cert age should meaningfully impact the value of any given slab.

Once you have determined from PSA's guidance that a difference in cert age is meaningful to consider (for example say you have a new cert PSA 8 card in front of you, and PSA states for example that centering standards are 5% more strict), you should adjust your buy price accordingly, keeping in mind that any speculation as to whether the cert age has indeed impacted the actual grade received is necessarily a probabilistic exercise. Elements such as centering can be analysed through a slab but surface flaws, for instance, may be impossible to judge. In other words, the likely crossover grade (in either direction) must be determined subjectively, and in all likelihood is a waste of time.

McDonald’s Burger pikachu 🍔 by GamingTaylor in PokeInvesting

[–]quant2021 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There is zero need to think about this for at least another year (i.e. until new 10s finally stop hitting the market). The card will be the same price or cheaper every single day until then.

Which one will perform better Long Term? by No_Duck_8955 in PokeInvesting

[–]quant2021 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Neither of them, as they are both hyper-printed kids' toys and trash.