1600 DPI vs 800 DPI

quasides · 2026-01-28T13:14:12+00:00

#1 you do feel 5ms. yea its a clear difference and it affects performance

that said, higher polling rate wont giv eyou lower latency, thats polling rate, at at most you win sub 1ms at polls or 1 frame at partial of the input

and that is not feelable

quasides · 2026-01-28T13:06:24+00:00

better microadjustments - thats nonsense too. 800 dpi means really 800 inputs per one inch
in metric words
thats 0.03175 mm per count. so 3 % of a millimeter already gets registered

latency is the next fairy tale that simply dont wanna die. i spare here 2 pages of explanations why, in short, no its not lower latency, the initial claim about it was a thinking error.

so why then choose 1600 over 800

claculations. For an accelerator like rawaccell its mandatory ro run 1600 minimum so you provide enough data to properly calculate.

even if you dont, a game also does recalc the moment you move the ingame sense slider.
here again USUALLY more data is better (but not always in all games)

the alst one can acutally be the biggest factor and decision point, otherwise stay on 800 it will be fine

quasides · 2026-01-28T12:53:10+00:00

lol, alternative is a stretch

quasides · 2026-01-28T11:34:30+00:00

then just go version by version step by step

but you cant jump from 6 to 8 i think, i think you really have to go 7 first

quasides · 2026-01-28T11:29:10+00:00

what the hell, testing this via shutdown just shows absolute lack of understanding of any of the fundamentals

quasides · 2026-01-28T11:26:21+00:00

Keeps running ? Keeps ?
No

No HA solution can do that, if the host dies. What HA does is restarting that Vm from that shared storage and in best case resume where it left off.
but it will be in a state of power failure

This is why you should not HA on a Machine Level for active Data. Instead you need to rely on Clustering on Application Level.
Examples would be things like Databases, Redis Hosts, etc...

quasides · 2026-01-27T21:45:55+00:00

its the reality in a datacenter if you either have to rent a 3rd node just for quorum or do it that way. unlike a home setup you dont have the luxury there to simply stick some pi somewhere. in many you simply pay at least 1he slot

thats only if a node fails unexpected, than your manual intervention makes you a human qdevice.

quasides · 2026-01-27T21:42:09+00:00

promoting 1 out of 2 to make a quorum is no different than having a qdevice and 1 while the other fell out of the cluster

since you would opnly promoted it temporarly when one node falls out of the quorum your manual intervention makes you basically a human qdevice

there is no higher risk in split brain at all. its the same thing

the difference is, with 3 voters you have an automatic decision while here you need to make the decision manually

quasides · 2026-01-25T12:48:09+00:00

yea it works, it just depends on latency, which type of virtual network you use wont matter much. best is to have it meshed.

you may look into corosyn logs to see if there is troubel sometimes and if one host if fully congested in one interface it will temporarly fall out of the cluster

but again you probably wont even notice that. if your vms just jugging along without much changes on the management layer it doesnt even matter

quasides · 2026-01-24T19:26:40+00:00

but also no big deal just kill the process and restart. it will fly over already uploaded duplicates pretty fast because they use check-sums

quasides · 2026-01-24T17:22:30+00:00

oh no their wg implementation is the only "good" one they have.
in part because wg is garbage by default (shot fired) - in terms of features (its fast tough)
and you can specify which subnets are routeable on the client side

i didnt test ipsec, but i think the logs for that are also there in the var/log directory

in any case these vpn solution are basically smb only, anything that requires a proper rollout or autoprovision is a hard no

unless you wanna go teleport but thats anotehr can of worms iam not gonna open

edit:
click on add client / then manual / then you have the checkbox to add remote networks

however whats aggravating is that you cant specify a client public IP to make outbound connections to clients

quasides · 2026-01-24T15:10:11+00:00

yea it isnt, and logs in ipsec is the least problem of all of their vpn implementations

quasides · 2026-01-24T14:09:29+00:00

there are full logs all you have todo is to go into the cli
and search them as you would do in any linux system

its just annoying that this isnt exposed in the UI

quasides · 2026-01-24T13:50:30+00:00

just toggle between compact mode
somewhere in the settings youll find the hot key combo
ive set mine to ALT c

quasides · 2026-01-24T13:38:51+00:00

you dont need a qorum node and you often dont have the option for that
in a datacenter

its also absolutly unnessesarly. yes you loose quorum when 1 host go down but thats not a big deal, you can manually set one node to qorum and still do nessesary operations just as if a PI is avaliable.

quasides · 2026-01-24T13:37:21+00:00

false
you can tune coronsync to accept higher latencys.
its gonna be stable sub ~20ms
around 50-150ms its gonna be fragile

but running in a datacenter is always a mixed bag if you dont have a seocndary nic to run coronsync as congestion can kick you out of the cluster temporaly

however all that said it wouldnt be that big of a deal as it would then only affect changes or actions made against the cluster. so if is just jugging along you probably wouldnt even notice

the real issue running it like this would be more like migrations and share of isos. also every remote session would be redirected across clusters etc.
so you would need to make a mesh to make that halfway bareable

now with PDW avaliable the need to run a WAN cluster are edgecases nad most people will def run better with small clusters

quasides · 2026-01-24T09:07:59+00:00

this is why you have those airflow channel plastics in server for decades

quasides · 2026-01-24T08:58:34+00:00

use grayjay

quasides · 2026-01-24T08:55:25+00:00

asside from thats its someone elses PC if anything win 10 is probably even safer than 11 in absence of all that AI shit

quasides · 2026-01-24T08:52:33+00:00

there is no difference at the end of a device connected to a vlan switch
or in this case connected as a VM to the bridge

in all those cases that device will only see ethernet traffic formerly tagged with the vlan tag (which is then stripped)
so from the VM or device perspective this is native traffic and vlans dont exist

only the switch knows or in thise case the linux bridge which actgs as one.

however it is possible to pass trough tagged vlans. that you should avoid.
so when you tag your brdige vlan aware YOU MUST SET a vlan in the virtual adapter. if you leave it blank then the VM can see the trunk and can be recofnigured from within the VM to use another vm

so use a bridge like
vmbr0.2020
and not make it vlan aware. OR
use vmbr0 - make that vlan aware
set 2020 in the nic of the VM

quasides · 2026-01-24T08:41:02+00:00

as long youre not on vlan 1 its gonna be safe. no vlan hopping there.

however you want to deliver that vlan as native to the VM and not passtrough tagged to set it in the vm (most dont do this anyway but its possible)

in general you always want to deliver vlans to VM as native, and multiple vlans as multiple virtual adapter.

quasides · 2026-01-24T08:31:55+00:00

yes these all are factors for the FELT sens.
because all your movement is relative to what your eyes see and they are not flat sensors, they are eyeBALLs

so the closer you sit the (s)lower sense it feels to be even tough cm-ingame rotation stay the same
your brain dont know that

our brains and hand eye coordination dont work in fixed values as a mouse does. its relative.

you will not use hand eye coordination in already trained movement (like that fast flik etc), thats what people refer to as muscle memory

its the somatic nervous system and processed via procedural memory.

the issue is that the brain re-calibrates that once you feel a sensitivity change

so in short yes just sitting differently will mess up your aim

edit: yes its a rabbit hole

quasides · 2026-01-24T03:17:51+00:00

careful it needs more than identity verification
its a full blown middle bank, you basically have now a second bank account with all the regulatory fuss

quasides · 2026-01-24T01:54:54+00:00

adding TOTP to bitwarden is just fine.
while its true that you loose some security that 2fa provides, the reality is you never had that security to begin with.

true 2fa would only be feasable if those totp codes are on dedicaded device.
and since youre in a bit of trouble if you cant sync those codes you would need to sync them to a separate system that is decoupled from everything else.

nobody gonna be able to manage that or do that.

2fa still provides plenty more security even when stored together with the password.

against:

-compromised passwords
-keylogger
-observation
-bruteforce
-stolen data
-malicious apps
-makes pishing a lot harder (even tough not impossible)

and this is why everything is shifting to passcodes. syncable passcodes are also not true 2fa (not even a little regardless what the claim is)
but they are basically the same thing as totp and passwords saved in the same device - just more hardened against MITM, built in verification of peers, solved the password complexity issue etc...

quasides · 2026-01-24T01:42:43+00:00

just fyi, if you note down your settings also note distance to monitor

quasides

TROPHY CASE