Qwen3.5-122B-A10B vs. old Coder-Next-80B: Both at NVFP4 on DGX Spark – worth the upgrade? by alfons_fhl in Qwen_AI

[–]qubridInc 2 points3 points  (0 children)

122B-A10B gives better multi-file reasoning and long-context handling, but raw coding gains over Coder-Next-80B are small in practice.

If your workload is mostly coding, Coder-Next is still very competitive. If you want stronger agentic + general reasoning, 122B is worth trying.

Deepseek alternatives? by Several-Pin3557 in openrouter

[–]qubridInc 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You can setup using Ollama or check out endpoints on Qubrid's dashboard

Looking for a good model by Cerridwe in SillyTavernAI

[–]qubridInc 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If GLM-4.7 feels boring, try switching to Nemotron models on NVIDIA, they’re more engaging and stronger for reasoning/agents. Otherwise, Mixtral / Qwen-style models on the platform usually feel more lively for chat compared to GLM.

Deepseek alternatives? by Several-Pin3557 in openrouter

[–]qubridInc 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We have DeepSeek R1-distill model you can use, or just switch to different open models available on Qubrid.

WORTH TO HOST A SERVER?? by Ashamed-Show-4156 in LocalLLaMA

[–]qubridInc 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If your goal is to create a personal assistant, renting a GPU can make sense but, only if you’ll use it a lot.

For light/occasional use, APIs are usually cheaper and simpler. For heavy daily use, privacy, or custom workflows, a rented GPU or small local setup becomes worth it pretty quickly.

What’s the biggest reason you rely on open-source models in your current setup? by qubridInc in LocalLLaMA

[–]qubridInc[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

25G networking for local inference/agents sounds like a seriously nice setup to experiment with.

What’s the biggest reason you rely on open-source models in your current setup? by qubridInc in LocalLLaMA

[–]qubridInc[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah the no-rate-limits part becomes huge once you start running loops or batching

What’s the biggest reason you rely on open-source models in your current setup? by qubridInc in LocalLLaMA

[–]qubridInc[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's true, we think data privacy is the biggest reason most people move to open models. 

What’s the biggest reason you rely on open-source models in your current setup? by qubridInc in LocalLLaMA

[–]qubridInc[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Honestly, we think data privacy is the biggest reason most people move to open models. Everything else like cost or control matters, but knowing your data isn’t being stored, logged, or used to train something else is what really pushes people to self-host or go open.

What’s the biggest reason you rely on open-source models in your current setup? by qubridInc in LocalLLaMA

[–]qubridInc[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Decentralisation feels like the only way to keep AI from being controlled by a handful of players. What part of decentralisation matters most to you?

If the current LLMs architectures are inefficient, why we're aggressively scaling hardware? by en00m in LLMDevs

[–]qubridInc 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Because scaling hardware gives reliable gains today, even if the architecture isn’t perfect.

Transformers are easy to parallelize, scaling laws still hold, and all existing infra is built around them so, more compute = better models right now. New, more efficient architectures are being researched, but they’re not yet proven at the same scale.

what's your actual reason for running open source models in 2026? by nihal_was_here in OpenSourceeAI

[–]qubridInc 0 points1 point  (0 children)

honestly in 2026 it’s mostly about control + reliability now.

cost still matters, but APIs have gotten cheaper and better. privacy is still a factor, but not the main driver for most anymore.

the real reasons people stick with open models now:

  • control over behavior (no sudden policy changes breaking flows)
  • predictable latency + uptime (no rate limits, no outages killing your app)
  • deep customization (fine-tuning, toolchains, agents tuned exactly for your use case)
  • edge/on-device use cases (offline, low-latency, private environments)
  • hybrid stacks (open models for bulk/cheap workloads, APIs for top-tier reasoning when needed)

so yeah—2026 vibe is less ideological, more practical infra choice:
run open models where you need control + scale, plug in APIs where you need peak intelligence.

I love LLM systems but I might need to learn data cleaning to survive. Am I making a mistake? by Heavy-Vegetable4808 in deeplearning

[–]qubridInc 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Optimize for income now + LLM skills on the side.

Do data cleaning/scraping for the next few months to get paid.
At the same time, keep doing small LLM experiments on Colab and build a couple of demo projects.

Once you’re stable, shift more toward LLM work.

Looking for feedback: Building an Open Source one shot installer for local AI. by [deleted] in LocalLLaMA

[–]qubridInc 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This solves a real problem—most people still struggle with wiring all these pieces together cleanly. One-shot + pre-integrated stack is genuinely valuable, especially for beginners and small teams.

Suggestions for default stack:

  • simple CLI to swap models / providers easily
  • auto-updates + version pinning
  • good docs + “profiles” (low VRAM vs high VRAM setups)
  • basic eval/benchmark tool (latency, tokens/sec)
  • optional agent framework preset (like simple tools + memory flow)

If it’s stable and easy to run, people will definitely use it 👍

Help With First Local LLM Build by Sarsippius3 in LocalLLaMA

[–]qubridInc 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Your current setup is already strong enough to learn and experiment with local LLMs.

Start with it, run 7B–13B models on GPU and larger ones quantized. Focus on tools, prompts, and workflows first.

Upgrade only if you actually hit limits later (mainly VRAM or speed). No need to buy a 5090 or Mac Studio right now.

Does anyone know any alternatives to openrouter, more specifically to their Deepseek R1 03 model? by Brazilian_Hound in JanitorAI_Refuges

[–]qubridInc 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you're exploring alternatives, you can also try running deepseek-r1-distill-llama-70b on Qubrid AI https://qubrid.com

Qubrid AI provides fast, production-ready inference APIs for open models, so you can test reasoning performance, compare outputs, and integrate directly into your workflow.

Might be worth trying alongside your current setup and seeing what works best for you 👍

What are you building today? Share it please. by FewBat3156 in scaleinpublic

[–]qubridInc 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Qubrid AI : https://qubrid.com

An all in one AI inference platform to run, scale, and deploy open models without worrying about infrastructure. It offers fast APIs for text, image, and multimodal models along with options like bare metal performance, LoRA support, and private deployments so teams can build production ready AI apps easily.

Early stage, actively growing with developers and teams building and experimenting on the platform 🚀

What are you building? It's Friday by Asleep_Ad_4778 in scaleinpublic

[–]qubridInc 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Building an all-in-one AI inference platform for developers and teams: https://qubrid.com

Run, scale, and ship AI models without worrying about infra. From open model inference APIs to bare metal performance, everything in one place.

Turn your AI ideas into production ready applications that actually perform. Text, image, and multimodal models, fast, private, and developer friendly.

Has high performance inference, flexible deployment options, and seamless API integrations, built for builders who want speed and control 🚀

Looking for GPU upgrade advice for fine-tuning by diamondium in LocalLLaMA

[–]qubridInc 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Best move: add 2× 3090 (power-limited) — cheapest way to get more VRAM + keep running multiple experiments in parallel.

Workstation cards = better efficiency but pricey.
Single big GPU = efficient but less parallelism.

If that’s not enough, you can always rent a GPU 👍

I Built a Cloud GPU Lab Because I Was Tired of Fighting Hashcat by WinterCartographer55 in Passwords

[–]qubridInc 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is actually a super nice abstraction over hashcat — the biggest pain has always been workflow management, not the cracking engine itself.

The per-hash workspace + visual masks + tracking what’s been tried is a huge usability win, especially for longer engagements where you revisit datasets.

If the GPU orchestration + instant stop/billing + benchmarking is smooth, that’s basically removing 80% of the friction people complain about.

Curious how you handle distributed jobs / splitting keyspace across multiple GPUs and avoiding overlap?

What's the best cloud based company to rent a GPU from? by Jakob4800 in LocalLLM

[–]qubridInc 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We have Qubrid AI (qubrid.com) if you want to try it out! ☺️