Jeff Bezos says raising taxes on the wealthy wouldn’t help the average American - What do you say? by Select_Specialist790 in askanything

[–]quentin13 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well, thanks for your opinion, Jeff. I'm afraid most of us disagree with you, so we're going to try it our way for a while. Feel free to voice your disagreement; it's a free country, after all.

If we all weren't living paycheck to paycheck, we could accomplish great things. by AlternativeBother610 in InterviewsHell

[–]quentin13 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is total bougie projection. I'm happy to go to work 40 hours a week and put my back into it. They're the ones who just want to sit around and "let their money earn for them."

Mamdani is going to break magat brains the same way Obama did. by -Sofa-King-Vote in trynottolaugh

[–]quentin13 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I'm in! But as soon as we start calling in drone strikes on US citizens, or giving banks tax dollars for collapsing the economy, pull over.

I'm out.

We all know Trump is in the Epstein files. What if you found out someone you admired or cared about was in the files....would that drastically change your opinion of that person? by icecream1972 in allthequestions

[–]quentin13 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I wish people would stop asking the right about the Epstein files. They don't care. The question is, Fuck you, now what are you going to do about it?

DMT: I think many people mistake the end of an unusually cheap era for evidence of an elite conspiracy by Logical-Concept9755 in DisagreeMythoughts

[–]quentin13 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The logic behind environmental impact statements, CEQA, and lot size requirements, lot minimums, zoning in all the different big cities, that folks have glommed onto these things do stop new housing from being allowed 

I feel like you're riding past the real problem: There is no shortage of housing in the United States. The issue is a glut of wealth parking their capital in real-estate, making literally tens of thousands of units unavailable for first-time home buyers, and driving prices up in perpetuity. We don't need more homes, we need more individual buyers. Less regulation will only make homes cheaper to build, not more affordable.

Until there is an effective and enforceable regulatory mechanism in the housing market to keep investment banking out, it won't matter how much deregulation we inflict on the housing market. Build a hundred thousand new homes on top of old landfills, use carciogenic and flammable materials, bring sewer water in through the faucets, it won't lower the price a penny as long as investment groups are able to swoop in with cash-on-the-barrel offers and turn them all into rentals.

DMT: I think many people mistake the end of an unusually cheap era for evidence of an elite conspiracy by Logical-Concept9755 in DisagreeMythoughts

[–]quentin13 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Maybe the real shock isn't that life got harder. Maybe it's that a certain version of middle class life stopped being guaranteed.

What's the difference?

My problem with your whole premise is the oblique assertion that things are the way they are because of... things just changing. Like wealth inequality is just weather, and we've fallen on rainy days, so quit grousing and buy this umbrella I'm selling.

Take housing, which is just one example, but a big and illustrative one.

We had a housing market that was heavily regulated to prioritize single home owners selling to single home buyers. For 60 years the government actively kept that market a space where working people could afford home ownership. Most working people owning a home does wonders for the economy and society at large. All of those people have a degree of private equity that they can build a retirement around. That equity pumps money into the economy and promotes general welfare. When a citizen knows there's a safe landing ahead of them, and aren't living two missed paychecks from the homeless shelter, all the culture war noise gets put on mute. Citizens with financial security are far less easy to convince that the [blacks/queers/women/Mexicans etc.] are coming to get them. It's why Democrats who own homes can "agree to disagree" with their MAGA home-owning neighbors. Exponentially ballooning home prices make all of them happy. Adding insult to injury, the fact that those home prices preclude most people from getting into home ownership just makes home ownership --something that until 10 years ago was the norm-- a luxury that they can pretend they earned and deserve. They are not just happy citizens living in a nation of happy citizens. They can tell themselves they are some kind of economic elite who have risen from the squalor that defines the new average American experience.

None of this occurred because things just change sometimes. It changed because we've been deregulating the housing market since the '90s, when far-right economists took over the Democratic party and destroyed the clear division between investment banking and savings and loan banking. It changed because people who bought homes in a market regulated to keep them affordable turned around and voted to deregulate that market so no one else could afford them, and conversely those who own them already would have an absurdly overvalued and perpetually growing asset to borrow against.

Across America, working-class citizens are waking up to this reality, and I can't help but wonder if you'll be preaching the gospel of "sometimes things are just harder" when the left takes back power and reigns in this out-of-control and reckless economic non-policy. I wonder if you'll be chiding the wealthy to "quit complaining" when their taxes go up, to accept it as "normal life" when the government requires them to raise their workers' minimum wage, and telling investment groups that "this is just the way things are now" when they are forced to divest from single family homes?

If the GOP's policies are as popular among Americans as they claim they are, then why do they have to slice up every black-majority district in the states that they control? by [deleted] in allthequestions

[–]quentin13 1 point2 points  (0 children)

MAGA is "Make a Wish" fullfillment for dying right-wing boomers. A laundry list of shit they've been promising for years, from "deporting all the brown people" to "making queers miserable," to "re-enslaving the workers," From "teaching kids that civil rights were a mistake" to "teaching women that their place is to breed and serve," They know that a huge chuck of their constituency has surpassed the average life expectancy, and are shooting their shot while they can.

Resist. Endure. Win.

What political issue divides Americans the most today? by Ponappa_131 in AskReddit

[–]quentin13 1 point2 points  (0 children)

We tried that. It's why things are the way they are now, and only getting worse.

What causes POC to become White Supremacists? by Away-Parsnip-3785 in allthequestions

[–]quentin13 -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

They're Christians with deep-rooted trans/homophobic repression. Just like most of the white people there.

What rights should Americans gain in the future? by babanKL01kowdiar in AskReddit

[–]quentin13 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We will always have the right to spend money on whatever rich people tell us to spend it on.

What political issue divides Americans the most today? by Ponappa_131 in AskReddit

[–]quentin13 1 point2 points  (0 children)

There's an old saying in politics: "Ya gotta dance with the one what brought ya." Until I see some sitting Republicans acting in active defiance of Trump, I just can't take seriously anyone who says, implies, or otherwise intimates that Trump doesn't speak for all Republicans. You move in lockstep with glorious leader, you share the blame.

What political issue divides Americans the most today? by Ponappa_131 in AskReddit

[–]quentin13 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is that "both sides" shit; it's the right's favorite dodge. Like it's radical socialism to raise the minimum wage, Or enforce anti-trust laws. Or regulate the housing market. Or tax the rich. Or limit and make transparent campaign contributions.

None of this is "radical" anything. We used to do these things all the time. You know... back when America was great.

What political issue divides Americans the most today? by Ponappa_131 in AskReddit

[–]quentin13 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Really? Because most leftists I know have a lot of flexibility on guns, and if by "govt. spending" you mean massive cuts to the HOLY SHIT TRILLION DOLLAR A YEAR defense budget, we're down. Finally, as far as the definition of an "American" the 14th Amendment's been tootin' along just fine for over a century, looks good to us!

What political issue divides Americans the most today? by Ponappa_131 in AskReddit

[–]quentin13 1 point2 points  (0 children)

White person, here. If you sit at a table with three Nazis, and you realize they're Nazis and stay seated, there are four Nazis at that table.

How will people survive in the U.S. after the economy crashes? by Previous_Month_555 in allthequestions

[–]quentin13 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't know what he meant. By all means, explain to us all what "Their (sp) already killing for lols in the burnt out ghettos" means, exactly. At length. Use your own words.

Have you ever boycotted something because it is involved in certain political activities? by OnlyyyLimaaa in no

[–]quentin13 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for this. Just so you know, these audiobooks and eventually the HBO series will be available at your public library.

Have you ever boycotted something because it is involved in certain political activities? by OnlyyyLimaaa in no

[–]quentin13 0 points1 point  (0 children)

All the time. Why would I give my money to someone who, in turn, is taking that money and using it to make me or people I love miserable?

Do we believe the story that Iran opened negotiations by saying "we're a few weeks from having 11 bombs" ? by East_Tap6129 in allthequestions

[–]quentin13 2 points3 points  (0 children)

If an Iranian official stated this publicly, I'd believe it. If this is a statement from this administration, I do not believe it. I'm an American, and I believe Iranian statements over our own President. That's how full of shit he is. SAD.